Dean Solo wrote:
Does GOD shoot with a Cannon or a Nikon

No.

Brandon Ching wrote:
Last I heard, he was shooting Mamiya..

He dropped Mamiya a year ago after they announced the ZD in 2004 and still haven’t released it. Traded all his Mamiya gear for a Hasselblad H2D.

Classichorror wrote:
God shoots with a Pentax!!!

He leaves Canon and Nikon to lesser beings.

Exactly.

Dean Solo wrote:
You know, the ALMIGHTY!

Bruce?

Dean Solo wrote:
Shhhh!!!! Truthfully God created the Sun and the Stars and the Moon so he could photograph them using his Nikon d200. And yes, for you prudent models out there.....Adam and Eve were simulating nudity.

Uh huh, but those dinosaurs A and E rode to church on on Sunday were nude!

Brandon Luna wrote:
I saw Jesus at my church yesterday while I was at Lint Mass. He was using Canon 20D with 2.8f 70-200mm lens.

Sounds more like you saw the Devil.

pw-gii photographics wrote:
A camera is just a tool.

So. For god's sake, you guys - let it go.

Yeah, but one camera is better than the other!!!

D. Brian Nelson wrote:
...but God shoots this:



And He doesn't have to meter.

And...handholds it.

-D

Damnit, I was just searching for that picture!

David Johnson wrote:
I just want to hear peoples opinions on this topics. I personally use Nikon for the fact Nikon is the most consistant. Nikon makes the same lens mount for all there cameras and the CMOS chip stays consistant with all their Digital cameras. Canon on the other hand changes there lens mounts all the time and from digital camera to digital camera, their CMOS chip changes. Canon has a bunch of Engineers that develop their cameras, whereas Nikon has engineers develop the technology and Professional Photographers design the layout and body, the they put the two together. I personally lost respect for Canon when they released the Digital Rebel. It looked like a Tonka Toy. I laughed when I saw so called Professional Photographers using that camera. What are you thoughts????

This is the 3rd topic that I have seen you with the exact same post. Give it a rest - specially since you have so many 'facts' wrong.

I propose you stop worrying about what camera you are using and spend more time on getting good results with whatever tool you have.

David Johnson wrote:

Yeah, but one camera is better than the other!!!

Perhaps, but anyone who considers himself or herself a good photographer should be able to get the job done (and probably indistinguishably) with any of the top-of-the-line cameras.

JenniferMaria wrote:
She doesn't need a stinking camera. She just messes around with lighting to confuse outdoor photographers and laughs at the indoor photographers who try to play god in the studio.

"Let there be light!"

and all this time I was thinking that it was my fault when  i took terrible studio shots

Bryan Benoit wrote:
and all this time I was thinking that it was my fault when  i took terrible studio shots

I know it's my fault when I do the same, but yeah, I try to play god. It feels so good to light stuff. Until hurricane season comes and we have no power. Then time to pull out the flashlights.

mphot wrote:
God cant use a camera .....He is DEAD (Nietzsche)

He lives in peoples dreams.

D. Brian Nelson wrote:
...but God shoots this:



And He doesn't have to meter.

And...handholds it.

-D

I was going to suggest a Kodak Instamatic 134, or perhaps a Brownie but then I saw this. Now I have faith that Mr. Nelson is on the right track.

And he hand holds it at slow shutter speeds...

Bryan Benoit wrote:

This is the 3rd topic that I have seen you with the exact same post. Give it a rest - specially since you have so many 'facts' wrong.

I propose you stop worrying about what camera you are using and spend more time on getting good results with whatever tool you have.

AMEN!!!!!