Forums >
General Industry >
::: a question for photogs, about models "shaving":::
Posted by Glamour Boulevard: Posted by Rowen: Posted by theda: Compared what - or compared to what? I'm certainly not interested in *comparing* a little girls genitals! Besides, I do believe there's laws about that stuff for people my age! 5 years? where have you been? I recall it started being very common in the late 80s and early 90s It took you a month to think of that reply? Aug 08 05 07:32 am Link As evolution would have it, theres no reason for hair on the body other than to keep those areas warm. The cavemen &(women) NEEDED hair almost everywhere for the lean hardy winters. After we were upright & wore animal skins, it became less important, and as such, many american women started shaving off the un-needed hair ( most other countries in the world, women DON'T shave anything & the men find THAT attractive ). Having said all that, I prefer the woman be shaved completly, as most of my shots are nude/seminude, and hair makes the model seem to look "Neanderthal'ish".....same can be said for men too, as I look at my own pic's from 10-12 years ago, I can't believe I have a "bush" in them...YUCK ! Now as far as the ingrown hairs, that doesn't last & if shaved properly, it won't happen at all....as far as the bumps are concerned, its a non-issue if the person shaves at night after a shower, and applies Neosporin to the area & wears no panties to bed. Aug 08 05 08:42 am Link |