This thread was locked on 2011-12-16 22:54:37
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Tuesday...... ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110212/21/4d5768246cadf.jpg]()
Photographer
Lee Gillies
Posts: 1560
London, England, United Kingdom
Tuesday.. ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110425/06/4db578fb50d3f.jpg]() Allegra
Photographer
Bellinger
Posts: 2248
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Tuesday: ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110426/00/4db67b550d627.jpg]()
Model
Kendra Leigh
Posts: 1325
Fort Wayne, Indiana, US
Tuesday ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110420/12/4daf3af826f3e.jpg]()
Model
name changed
Posts: 397
London, England, United Kingdom
Tuesday  ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110326/07/4d8dfa8c9b354.jpg]()
Photographer
Steve Lease
Posts: 3662
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, US
Tuesday ![https://i1081.photobucket.com/albums/j343/steve4710/AMAP_JAX.jpg]()
Model
Stacie Marie
Posts: 954
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
tuesday... ![https://i903.photobucket.com/albums/ac237/StacieB727/2010%20modeling%20portfolio/img_8009.jpg]()
Photographer
ANTHONY NESTE
Posts: 1811
Flagler Beach, Florida, US
tuesday, it's Sarah ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110423/05/4db2bfcd80d31.jpg]()
Photographer
T R Willmitch
Posts: 7173
Normal, Illinois, US
Nacole wrote:
I feel whoever is suppose to supervise what pics go in these contest needs to stay on top of it like the pictures that are in picture of the day(not 18+) because there are some that shouldnt be there due to being full nudes. Nudes should be only found in the 18+ and the editors should keep better track of it. You might want to actually read the mature image guidelines before making such statements. Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/info/rules/images
"Nudes" are not necessarily +18 images and not all mature images include nudity.
Photographer
T R Willmitch
Posts: 7173
Normal, Illinois, US
Taking a closer look at Khaili Conway's entry: Khaili Conway wrote:
Tuesday
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/101228/07/4d1a0772ab084.jpg]()
Model
x Ali
Posts: 2543
West Hollywood, California, US
Photographer
dgold 2
Posts: 1322
North Smithfield, Rhode Island, US
Model
Sadie M
Posts: 144
Durham, North Carolina, US
Photographer
David Arts
Posts: 1342
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Model
Miss Leilani Jade
Posts: 2513
Decatur, Alabama, US
T R Willmitch wrote:
You might want to actually read the mature image guidelines before making such statements. Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/info/rules/images
"Nudes" are not necessarily +18 images and not all mature images include nudity. I had never read this before but after reading it, -bare buttocks -implied sexual activity and -see through or semi-transparent clothing are often seen
Photographer
Eric Courtney
Posts: 2118
Sacramento, California, US
Tuesday ![https://i645.photobucket.com/albums/uu175/thinktunk/amann_jacket01_low1.jpg]()
Model
x Ali
Posts: 2543
West Hollywood, California, US
Sendu wrote:
Tuesday:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110426/00/4db67b550d627.jpg]() vote
Model
Kelli Darlingg
Posts: 66
San Diego, California, US
Rob Maxwell Photography wrote:
Tuesday
![https://www.rob-maxwell.com/images/J&J520a-xsml.jpg]() Vote! Love this!
Model
Stacie Marie
Posts: 954
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
K E E L I N G wrote:
Tuesday......
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110212/21/4d5768246cadf.jpg]() vote!
Photographer
Steve Lease
Posts: 3662
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, US
dgold 2 wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/080206/18/47aa3cb3a631a.jpg]() VOTE
Photographer
Rob Maxwell Photography
Posts: 138
Telford, England, United Kingdom
David Hirsh wrote:
Tuesday!
![https://www.davidhirshphotography.com/mm/93.jpg]()
cheers,
David Hirsh VOTE!
Photographer
Eric Courtney
Posts: 2118
Sacramento, California, US
dgold 2 wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/080206/18/47aa3cb3a631a.jpg]() VOTE!
Photographer
Ademac Photographics
Posts: 2009
Berry, New South Wales, Australia
Alan Pedroso wrote:
![https://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2010/272/7/9/single_by_alan1828-d2zr4vv.jpg]() vote
Photographer
Sheri Baldwin
Posts: 1111
Orlando, Florida, US
Is it too late to enter? Don't think I've ever entered a POTD. ![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110423/06/4db2d6ad19e2d.jpg]()
Model
Kendra Leigh
Posts: 1325
Fort Wayne, Indiana, US
Lil Miss Jade wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110415/00/4da7f21409cf6.jpg]() Vote
Photographer
L Raye
Posts: 5045
Petaluma, California, US
dgold 2 wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/080206/18/47aa3cb3a631a.jpg]() Vote
Photographer
FJR Photography
Posts: 7049
Pekin, Indiana, US
Lil Miss Jade wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110415/00/4da7f21409cf6.jpg]() VOTE
Photographer
inLightenPhoto
Posts: 18
Minot, North Dakota, US
K E E L I N G wrote:
Tuesday......
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110212/21/4d5768246cadf.jpg]() Vote
Photographer
Alan Pedroso
Posts: 10159
Miami, Florida, US
dgold 2 wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/080206/18/47aa3cb3a631a.jpg]() VOTE
Photographer
dgold
Posts: 10302
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, US
Mr Photo Studios wrote:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/110318/22/4d8439a386a67.jpg]() VOTE.
Photographer
T R Willmitch
Posts: 7173
Normal, Illinois, US
T R Willmitch wrote:
You might want to actually read the mature image guidelines before making such statements. Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/info/rules/images
"Nudes" are not necessarily +18 images and not all mature images include nudity. Lil Miss Jade wrote:
I had never read this before but after reading it, -bare buttocks -implied sexual activity and -see through or semi-transparent clothing are often seen I strongly disagree. I police the contest for mature images, at times disqualifying several a day. Look back through the past week's contests and you'll see this.
Bare buttocks (thong or not) applies only at angles from the rear and not when viewing the flanks. Even so, this is a difficult rule to interpret fairly since many lingerie shots fall into a grey area.
Likewise implied sexual activity is open to interpretation and difficult to apply evenhandedly. That said, I don't feel we see many entries that strongly portray sexual behavior in this contest. So it's generally not an issue.
See-through clothing (including lingerie) is fine as long as nothing is revealed that violates other mature image criteria. I watch closely for this and it's one of the more common reasons for images to be disqualified (as opposed to full nudity that violates the image guidelines).
Again, the thing to keep in mind is that just because an image includes nudity it's not necessarily a mature image by Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines. All the Moderators do their best to set personal feelings aside regarding what is and is not an appropriate image, following these guidelines instead.
When it comes to the contests then I'm inclined to give as much leeway as possible while still following the site's mature image guidelines. I would rather let contest participants choose images they prefer rather than me do it for them -- while keeping the contest within its own and site rules.
|
