Steve Kinsey 19K wrote:
I look at these posts occasionally, check out the person doing the posting and move on most of the time.  In this case I have to respond

Unfortunately, we are not allowed to critique the person doing the critiques, unless they ask for it, that would be considered an unsolicited critique, and can get you tossed in to the brig, may want to change your post before the mod squad finds it

Just sayin

Charles West wrote:
He's cool, Leo, and he's correct.  Pop shots at me are completely acceptable.

Okay, if your cool with it, I just hate to see people brigged when there is no need

wesfoto wrote:
Of course, by default of the strictest definition, I am a male, and I've taken pictures with a camera...but, I think you're using the more "specific" internet definition (although EXACTLY what that definition is, I'll leave to you).  So, am I latter?  (Because in all cases, I am the former.) 

Only one shot in your portfolio is GWCish.  And, it's VERY GWCish, even though it has a billion comments.

All other shots are well done.

Charles West wrote:

Only one shot in your portfolio is GWCish.  And, it's VERY GWCish, even though it has a billion comments.

All other shots are well done.

Just one?  Wow!  I figured on more than that.  So, I'm just a bit GWCish around the edges?  Can you let me know which one?  Because, if its the one I think it is, you're telling me that a GWC could pull off that lighting?

And, thanks for the "well done" on the rest. 

Julian Wilde Studio wrote:
Actually, I think I'm a GWSC: "A Guy With Several Cameras!!"  ;-)  You tell me!  -JULIAN

yeah right Julian nice try.lol

Charles West wrote:
Does your work come across as being GWCish? 

I'll let you know, based EXCLUSIVELY on your current portfolio.

I'll let you know why, too, but you have to ask.

I'll let models know if they have any work FROM a GWC.

If you post here at all, you're getting judged.
If you don't want to play silly MM games, DO NOT post.

Drive by pop shots at me are also acceptable.  I know who I am.

Hell, I've been called one before. One more aint gonna matter to me! :p

John Milton wrote:
Love to hear your thoughts...

John

Not a GWC, and in no danger of becoming one.

E Liz Art wrote:

10% GWC.

Digital Perspective wrote:
Interested in knowing if my fear of being a GWC are founded

Not too founded.  Not bad at all.  Only 20% GWC.

Jessica Kellie wrote:
I do See if you can spot which one

You are choosing your photographers well, and are not shooting with GWCs.

Retinal Fetish wrote:
Well I know I AM!!! ....  but how well am I hiding it?

Very good at hiding it!  Only 15% GWC.

ImagesbyPT wrote:
If you're judging based on what I mainly shoot....I'm probably in trouble! ;-)

PT

Close to 100% GWC. 
Five cookies for not trying to hide it!

A J Kirchner wrote:
I was a gwc at one point but where am I now?

You are rapidly escaping any GWC connotations.  Only about 20%  GWC.  A little portfolio editing, and no one will ever know.

Sync Studioz wrote:
last time i checked I was still a guy and have one working camera ;-p
hmmm i guess so????

Not bad at all.  0% GWC. 

No.  Not a GWC.

Charles West wrote:

Very good at hiding it!  Only 15% GWC.

Well seeing as I have 20 pics, which three give me away?

ZZZphotos wrote:
I have 2 cameras, so does that make me a GW2C?

You're trying hard not to be and it shows.  Only around 10% GWC.

Retinal Fetish wrote:

Well seeing as I have 20 pics, which three give me away?

PM sent.

RJM PHOTO CAPTURE wrote:
amateur GWC
or GWC?

Full blown, 100% GWC.

Congratulations.

D P Photo wrote:
what's my percentage?

Images show you are trying, and improving. 
Only around 20% GWC.

Leroy Dickson wrote:
Hmmmm ... ok...I'd like to hear this

Good going.  Although not all are saleable, many are.  You're clearly not a GWC, and nobody will ever think you are.

Julian Wilde Studio wrote:
Actually, I think I'm a GWSC: "A Guy With Several Cameras!!"  ;-)  You tell me!  -JULIAN

0% GWC. 

Top quality work.  Well done.