I would like to think that I am a GWC. Let me know what you think. lol. Jan 11 10 03:29 pm Link I'll play ![]() Jan 11 10 03:29 pm Link Chuck Bean wrote: Only a few images give me the GWC vibe. Others smooth it out nicely. Jan 11 10 03:29 pm Link Steve Alkok wrote: Excellent. 0% GWC. Jan 11 10 03:30 pm Link SteveB_photos wrote: About 70% GWC. Definitely getting the vibe, but you shouldn't have a problem getting models. Jan 11 10 03:33 pm Link Carlos Alcantara wrote: You're learning and you're trying. I don't get any GWC vibe. Jan 11 10 03:35 pm Link %? Jan 11 10 03:37 pm Link fine art nudes by paul wrote: Nope. Not a GWC. 0% Jan 11 10 04:27 pm Link elior88 wrote: Yup. GWC. Although a couple are quite nice of the girl against the wall outdoors. Jan 11 10 04:29 pm Link Duane Allen wrote: About 70% GWC. Jan 11 10 04:31 pm Link Erwyn L wrote: Very nice work. 0% GWC. Jan 11 10 04:32 pm Link I want to know if I'm a GWC.. whatever that means.. Jan 11 10 04:35 pm Link barepixels wrote: Believe it or not, no, you are not a GWC. Jan 11 10 04:36 pm Link ??pls.. ![]() Jan 11 10 04:36 pm Link ??pls.. ![]() Jan 11 10 04:36 pm Link Sure throw it at me. Read the profile as well. I am also still learning and would like input. Tori was my last shoot. Jan 11 10 04:39 pm Link why not... Jan 11 10 04:44 pm Link I'll play along. Jan 11 10 04:44 pm Link CHLNGR wrote: You look far more inexperienced than GWCish. Jan 11 10 04:54 pm Link Schwig wrote: Top 8 shots I get no GWC feelings at all. Jan 11 10 04:59 pm Link Square Pixel LLC wrote: You're doing really well! Edit out the crappy GWC shots, and you're well on your way to some sales. Jan 11 10 05:04 pm Link James O Wright wrote: Delete #4, #5, #8, #9, and #12, and you'll be fine. Nobody will think you're a GWC after doing so, but, they're killing your portfolio now. Jan 11 10 05:08 pm Link PBK Photography wrote: 100% GWC, although you have some nice shots. Jan 11 10 05:12 pm Link steelprism wrote: Nope. 0% GWC, and little chance of becoming one. Jan 11 10 05:16 pm Link Osur Ventura wrote: Nope. 0% GWC. OK. 5% GWC. You need to burn #7 and never let anyone see that image again. Ever. Jan 11 10 05:18 pm Link Ok! Count me in! But I thought GWC stood for "gentleman who cares" . . . my models think I am that definition! Jan 11 10 05:18 pm Link Charles West wrote: Thankyou very much that is good to hear. Would it be too much trouble to ask (In your opinion) What images I should remove? Feel free to Pm me. Thnx Jan 11 10 05:21 pm Link look at my pics please... (nobody looks at it, i don't have any naked girl pics) Jan 11 10 05:27 pm Link Charles West wrote: Thank you so much, and yes I agree, the back page is some of the first stuff I shot lol, so I need to go through and cull it out. Jan 11 10 05:31 pm Link Eclectic Vision wrote: 0% GWC. Excellent work, all of which is saleable. Jan 11 10 05:37 pm Link Wow Charles... did I really stir your pot or what? Jan 11 10 05:38 pm Link ArtsyCraftsy wrote: Not a GWC. Good. Jan 11 10 05:38 pm Link clarkphotography wrote: 90% GWC. Jan 11 10 05:39 pm Link photoshootwithbigberd wrote: Nope, not a GWC. Jan 11 10 05:40 pm Link Oh... .. and just out of interest, how do you rate (%) your own portfolio CW?... Jan 11 10 05:40 pm Link Studio32D wrote: Not bad at all. Only around 15% GWC. I think with time, nobody will ever know. Jan 11 10 05:41 pm Link I would certainly hope there's at least a little GWC left in me... Jan 11 10 05:42 pm Link Jan 11 10 05:43 pm Link Christopher Verdick wrote: #2 isn't GWC, it's just bad. Jan 11 10 05:44 pm Link Lord knows, I try to be. Jan 11 10 05:46 pm Link |