Sarah Smallwood wrote:
I'm not very experienced would appreciate the feedback thanks

You are still at your baby steps towards the path of being a good photographer.
the only eye catcher I like
Keep shooting and develop your lighting and style.
All the best!

Ekaterina Danilchenko wrote:
I do not have much material yet but I am interested to hear your opinion.

Perfect stats and gorgeous look

In this I can imagine how tall you are. You look stunning!
Your best
but your posing looks like more the girl next door on face book style.
Get busy seriously and get involved with photographers and get some look books and learn from others.

Linda mears wrote:
Interested!

Yay, like the cute style, posing and all you have to offer.
Your piercings and lip rings doesn't bother me a bit although I am old school.
Model
First impressions: Cute, alternative look
Your Skill level: Intermediate
Pluses: assertive and camera presence
Your money shot:
Your Work focus: Alternative cute horror ,gore
What I like: Girly attitude
What to delete: awkward photoshop job
Profile usefulness: Useful port but you are limiting your scope
Next Step: expand on other genres and shock people because you can pull off other type of work.
Verdict: cuteness is not enough, work more on your poses if you want to get real busy.

Steve SEAK wrote:
I'm interested in your thoughts...The port is intended to reflect what I'm saying on the front page.

hmm focus on black-background images with dramatic (or soft) lighting for portraits, 3/4-length, and full-body fashion, glamour, fitness, lingerie, tattoos, bodyscape, or fine art.?
OK but you are not achieving those goals at the highest level as your work is pretty weak in lighting composition and framing.
Black backgrounds are usually  trouble for the asking. If you will be wondering in that territory you must do better job in balancing your light. Non reflective backgrounds are as tricky as reflective ones. Deliver your joules accordingly.

Your best in the bunch: could be framed and cropped a lot better.
Your Skill level: Amateur
Your Creativity:
Technique:Lighting need to be improved
What I like: would be better with more contrast
Bottom line: A lot of work is needed.
Nothing to list at this time.

R Byron Johnson wrote:
Probably slitting my own throat here, but what the hell.  I've only been doing this for about a year.

Unable to show profile #2918335
This member is either awaiting approval or has removed their profile from the site.

Thornwood Studio wrote:
I would like to hear what you think , blast away!

hmm nikon shooter
nice setup
First impressions: flawed lighting (right arm burned)
Your Skill level: intermediate
Your money shot:
What I like eye brows could have been a bit darkened. Good beauty dish shot nevertheless.
Your Creativity: pretty generic approach to all aspect to photography.
Your Noteworthy Technique: post work color saturation and contrast dynamic range
Your Work focus: portraits and studio work with some shortcomings
What I don't like: bad light and awkward retouching on forehead
What to delete: bad habit of tight and random cropping plain bad lighting.
Profile usefulness: Somewhat useful, note "Last thing, I can take my lights on location, no electricity needed.  That means we could shoot on the beach or anywhere, and you will get well balanced lighting, just like in Vogue, lol. " (most people know that)
Next Step: Pay attention to details and practice to make it perfect
Verdict: Good work in general, improve studio lighting.
Nothing to list.

Verly Vinna wrote:
spend ur time 4 me please

Model
First impressions: It's a shame that you couldn't attract more photographers with better skills to capture your beauty.
Your Skill level: Amateur with soul, and can really do better.
Your money shot:
Challenges: Your lack of motivation and random posing.
Your Work focus: Undefined, most "work" could only inspire GWCs because an artistic slant is either missing or way below the bar.
What to delete: all +18
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/35168204
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33294211
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/35076860
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34447297 camera phone?
Bottom line: Work with better people as they didn't do you justice, delete "shot by boyfriend" camera phone material. Don't shoot for the sake of shooting.
Profile usefulness: We understand you really do this for fun, but even fun has rules and requirements. Your profile will only attract GWC

Qphoto wrote:
I am still fairly new here and would like to know what you think. Thanks.

Photographer
First impressions: Some great work is noted, butterflies didn't do for me but the rest is good.
Your Skill level: Hobbyist Intermediate
Your money shot:
Your Creativity:
What I like: kudos in this like the post as well
What to delete: not flattering to model (or to you )
Profile usefulness: somewhat useful
Verdict: Some great ideas and elaborate techniques are noted.
Bottom line: Glamor work could be a lot better. You should focus on Fashion more.

Robert Lintner wrote:
2 years behind the lense and 3 years doing makeup and fx. please feel free to judge. I look forward to your wisdom.

Photographer
First impressions: Lovely colorful strong port Could be your money shot but the shallow field of depth killed it.
Your Skill level: advanced hobbyist
Your creative side:
Your money shot:
What I like: nice sharp capture and reasonably good dynamic range and contrast.
What to delete: out of focus and awkward crop, meh model look
Profile usefulness: Useful
Verdict: Good lighting techniques are noted
Bottom line: Avoid excessive color boosts if not your work will not appear as natural.
Nothing to list

Michael R Photography wrote:
Ill jump in on this, kind of new but i think i got thick skin!

Photographer
First impressions: some nice work with beauty dishes
Your Skill level: hobbyist
Your lack of Technique: missing back light/hair light to create body outlines over black background
Your Work focus: portraits but avoid tight crops
What I like:
Next Step: experiment with multi source studio lighting

Hellen Makaryan wrote:
me please! best and worst, there will probably be more bad than good shots,(completely new to modeling)  but i'll learn from them

Hello Hellen
You may be new to modeling but you motivated me to skip 3 pages full of people waiting for their review and forward my thought LOL

Some will claim your height can be a handicap but everything else looks top to me.
You have a great body language, natural beauty, hypnotizing ethnic (Armenian) eyes and nose. You will do great but must really learn the ropes and apply them every chance you get.
pick photographers carefully and focus on beauty glamor and commercial modeling. Anything else will be a waste of time.
Your money shot: listed
delete or replace with better face pic on this one (one eye is too dark)
and doesn't look good (hair problem)
keep it up, people shoot beg you to shoot with you. I know I would.

varton wrote:

Awesome port and great strides in what you do.
I fancy this a lot

Below bedroom shots weakens your port
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31433954
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/31289199
I wish this was real

your +18 photos doesn't do much for me. Try to photoshop them in black and white.

Thanks a million, I value your opinion immensely.

frankfoto - new york wrote:
Appreciate your critique
Thanks in advance,
Frank

First impressions: Too much blur on some retouched photos. Average model management on posing as well.
Your Skill level: average, but good lighting skills noted on some photos
Your money shot:
What I like:
Your Creativity gage: pretty girls
Your Work focus: pretty girls
What I don't like: shallow depth of field on some photos appear awkward.
What to delete: liberal use of (I am guessing ) Gaussian blur and light soft diffusion in post liberal use of highlight shadows and mid range abuse, found some more photos with unneeded retouch work but didn't bother to list.
Nothing to list.