blacquejack wrote:

No I encourage models to work with people on any site, but all to often do I see models come back and complain about, the photographrs beeing jerks and lousy images.

What I do  encourage models to do is to look for photographers who has technical and creative skills

Thats good



Technical and creative skill, and not being a jerk, has nothing to do with the volume of nude work on this site.

Laura UnBound wrote:

Thats good



Technical and creative skill, and not being a jerk, has nothing to do with the volume of nude work on this site.

I shot a nekkid model today and I wasn't a jerk!!!! Now if only I had technical and creative skills....

IrishOne wrote:
Join a monastery and shoot nuns

Those filthy nuns are constantly implying they're nude and forcing me to use my imagination!

blacquejack wrote:

Guess, you didn't read my message, I do tons of nude work, and I make a decent living on it to. It's sad to see that you all so easily offended!!! I must have struck a cord somewhere!!! LOL

And, apparently, have succeeded in the purpose of your OP.

Congrats.

Lawrence Guy wrote:
Models are loaves of bread.

Mmmm.... boobs carbs...


*drool*

blacquejack wrote:
I been a member of this site for a very long time, like coming on here reading and looking at peoples work every now and then.

What I have noticed over the years is a tremedous amount of nudes!! What's the facination with nudes? As a model I would be very skeptical to pick a photographer from this site.

Honestly, some of the best photographers on here has fashion in their portfolios' headshoots and some covered nudes.

I personally shoot lots of nudes, fine art style and glamour style, but my basic principal is to approach every subject like it was a loaf of bread and create an awesome image of it. Using light, poses, angels and perspective, and I'm only staisfied with my nudes if it shows nothing, My goal is to make the viewer start their imagination, to to give the whole farm away up front.

Thank goodness you are here to show us the error of our ways.

Laura UnBound wrote:
I personally am more offended by being compared to a loaf of bread than I am upset about the amount of naked bitches on this site.

A loaf of bread? You don't mold, sculpt, carve, manipulate, create anything out of a loaf of bread. You know what you do with bread? You tear it apart and stuff it in your mouth hole.

No, I'm not okay being someone's metaphorical loaf of bread

Lump of clay is a better metaphor.

IDiivil wrote:
I like being nekkid. Sorry you don't like to see that.

I'm going to keep doing it anyways, though.

Jeri Jankovic wrote:
People are vile perverts.

Thank goodness!

Faith EnFire wrote:

first, this is a private website, so the whole freedom of speech thing...

your opinions are rather offensive to the nude models and photographers who do nude work well.

ok you don't like nudes, put on your work safe mode so you don't have to look at it, and don't shoot it.

+1

Jeff Fiore wrote:

Lump of clay is a better metaphor.

If you must, yes, clay is better than bread, at least it still holds some sort of artistic element

IDiivil wrote:
I like being nekkid. Sorry you don't like to see that.

I'm going to keep doing it anyways, though.

bravo!!

Terrell Gates wrote:
Oh give me a break!  I have been shooting nudes for over 50 years. The nude as subject is classic and deserves the highest station in the world of Fine Arts...

NUDES RULE!

+1

Laura UnBound wrote:

If you must, yes, clay is better than bread, at least it still holds some sort of artistic element

When I saw that post I immediately thought someone would say a model is a piece of meat and the photographer is the chef.

Sorry, I apologize profusely. Mea culpa.

BlueMoonPics wrote:
When I saw that post I immediately thought someone would say a model is a piece of meat and the photographer is the chef.

There are pay sites devoted to that concept.

Amelia Simone wrote:
I'm naked because shopping sucks and i'm a cheapskate

please continue being a cheapskate!  your portfolio is outstanding!!

ArtGlo wrote:

please continue being a cheapskate!  your portfolio is outstanding!!

Haha! Thank you!

blacquejack wrote:
What I have noticed over the years is a tremedous amount of nudes!! .

How would you know this? Why have you been so interested in viewing a "tremendous amount of nudes" over the years if you're trying to have us believe you're actually complaining about it? Oh, and again, not to mention the fact that YOU SHOOT A TON OF NUDES.

blacquejack wrote:
I hope so to (too), cause that would truely (truly) prove my point, lol, I guess personal opinions are not appreciated on here!!!! What happen (happened) to freedom of speach (speech)!!!!

Creating new threads should require a sobriety check.

Megan Gardner wrote:
I love being a naked loaf of bread.

.....

*refrains from joke*

BlueMoonPics wrote:
When I saw that post I immediately thought someone would say a model is a piece of meat and the photographer is the chef.

Lawrence Guy wrote:
There are pay sites devoted to that concept.

Ok... NOW I am scared!

blacquejack wrote:
Just totally love the amount of responses:) LOL

you enjoy being beat on ???? LOL!

blacquejack wrote:
my basic principal is to approach every subject like it was a loaf of bread and create an awesome image of it.

Must refrain from commenting on images of butter sliding sensuously down a perfectly tanned loaf of bread... heat from the lights accelerating the inevitable plunge into a open crevasse in the ... crust.  Beautifully contrasted by leaded crystal holding a full bodied... merlot... lit by multiple lazer pointers, diffracting and ricocheting about to ultimately fall upon the .... crust... and the melting butter.

Damn.  Now I am hungry!

blacquejack wrote:
Just totally love the amount of responses:) LOL

Just totally love the troll admission. ;o}

ASYLUM - Photo wrote:

.....

*refrains from joke*

Please tell me this joke involves yeast and I'm not the only repulsive person here?