Forums > Critique > Want me to rate you on a scale of 10?

Photographer

Doug Bolton Photography

Posts: 784

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

why not...?

May 05 14 10:41 am Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Bricksss wrote:
Ok what do you have to say about me? wink

Boujour:
I will say - its a start and not a bad one. Lets work on your camera positioning.

Port: 5
Lighting: 6
Camera Positioning: 5
Conceptualizations: 7

Overall: 5.5

May 05 14 07:52 pm Link

Photographer

NEXT LEVEL FIERCE

Posts: 13

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, US

Let's do it and thank you very much sir.

May 06 14 12:34 am Link

Model

Kelsey-Barnwell

Posts: 8

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Sure ! Any critique always helps

May 06 14 01:12 am Link

Photographer

KeithWJordan

Posts: 65

Boynton Beach, Florida, US

Would love to hear it....

May 06 14 04:44 pm Link

Photographer

I Ference Photography

Posts: 1202

Brooklyn, New York, US

Go for it!

May 06 14 09:35 pm Link

Photographer

Beautifully Soft Focus

Posts: 533

Plano, Texas, US

Digital Blitz wrote:
Your por had me intrigues for about good 20 minutes...I wanted to read every post, try to decipher every mood of the model, analyze the lighting used...

Simply put - outstanding work.

Port: 9
Conceptualization: 8
Camera angles: 8
Lighting: 8.

Overall: 8

Thank you ... Always striving to get better 😜

Be easy,

Alvin

May 07 14 02:41 am Link

Photographer

camilo

Posts: 794

Miami, Florida, US

Me please!

May 07 14 10:50 am Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Venice Photo and PR wrote:
Sure.  Your critique much appreciated!

Jack : You are an accomplished photographer. Your port and website pictures are outstanding. But forgive me - some of your portraits may have gone a touch over exposed and/or Over photoshopped. Just my opinion.

Port: 8.5
COnceptualization: 7.5
Lighting: 8
Camera Positioning: 9

Overall: 8

May 12 14 08:16 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Blimey Studios wrote:
why not...?

Blimey:
Nice work. Awesome portraits. But I didnt like this one https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/34282505 - it strains my eyes.

Port: 8.5
Lighting: 8
Camera ANgles: 8
Conceptualizations: 8.5

Overall: 8

May 12 14 08:20 pm Link

Photographer

deeeeeeeeeeelet

Posts: 70

New York, New York, US

I'll bite. smile

May 12 14 08:55 pm Link

Photographer

Distinct Edges

Posts: 30

San Diego, California, US

Rate me.

May 12 14 10:28 pm Link

Model

Julia Weber

Posts: 48

Indianapolis, Indiana, US

Please. smile

May 13 14 07:49 am Link

Model

Pauline Yee

Posts: 406

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Me please. And if you wouldn't mind, could you tell me ways I could improve ?

May 13 14 08:08 am Link

Model

Konnie A Stav

Posts: 44

London, England, United Kingdom

Go for it

May 13 14 10:13 am Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Rad Tirado  wrote:
Let's do it and thank you very much sir.

Outstanding photograph - and this is just an exceptional capture - https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33731327

Keep up the good work.

Port: 8.5
Conceptualization: 8
Lighting: 8
Camera angles: 7.5

Overall 8

May 13 14 07:07 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

KeithWJordan wrote:
Would love to hear it....

Most of your pictures are awesome but I didnt like the execution on this one https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32901602


Port:8.5
Lighting: 7.5
Camera angles: 7
Conceptualization: 8
Overall: 7.5

May 13 14 07:10 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

I Ference Photography wrote:
Go for it!

I have a feeling I have evaluated your port before. Outstanding work.

May 13 14 07:12 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

cmonmor wrote:
Me please!

Milomo - Just because of your educational pedigree my expectations went sky high before I went to your port - maybe I expected too high, but though your work is undoubtedly good, it is not great. I didnt get wowed (sorry, my opinion)

Port: 7
Conceptualization: 8
Lighting: 7
Camera angles; 7.5

Overall: 7

May 13 14 07:17 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Leah James wrote:
I'll bite. smile

Its a start and a good start at that. Needs building on that start.

Port: 6
Camera angles: 7
Lighting: 8
Conceptualization: 7.5
Overall: 7

May 13 14 07:19 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Distinct Edges  wrote:
Rate me.

Distinct:
You need to diversify your port. Good luck in CA.

Port: 5.5
Camera angles: 7
Lighting: 6
Conceptualizations: 6.5

Overall: 6

May 14 14 02:49 am Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Pauline Yee wrote:
Me please. And if you wouldn't mind, could you tell me ways I could improve ?

Pauline:
You have an awesome figure. But your port has some great pictures with some rank bad ones. A port is the model's resume, the best possible is tobe presented and highlighted. You need to weed some of them (e.g. https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/35476079) out. Also work on your expressions.

Port: 6.5
Looks: 7
Figure: 8.5
Expressions: 6.5
Overall: 7

May 14 14 02:55 am Link

Photographer

John Downward

Posts: 30

Manchester, England, United Kingdom

Go for it

May 14 14 05:01 am Link

Photographer

J Millman Photography

Posts: 198

Norwich, England, United Kingdom

Hit me!

May 14 14 05:09 am Link

Photographer

NEXT LEVEL FIERCE

Posts: 13

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, US

Digital Blitz wrote:
Outstanding photograph - and this is just an exceptional capture - https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33731327

Keep up the good work.

Port: 8.5
Conceptualization: 8
Lighting: 8
Camera angles: 7.5

Overall 8

Thank you for taking the time to view and critique my work. I will continue to work harder. Very much appreciated.

Rad

May 14 14 11:23 am Link

Model

Daniel Pierce

Posts: 634

Burbank, California, US

How are we doing now?

Thanks,

-D.Pierce

May 14 14 02:59 pm Link

Model

Julia Weber

Posts: 48

Indianapolis, Indiana, US

You didn't rate me I'd really appreciate the critique

May 14 14 05:12 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

John Downward wrote:
Go for it

John:
Other than your name - nothing is downward in your port, especially for a hobbyist photographer. This one is awe inspiring - https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/35967533


Port: 8
Camera angles: 8
Conceptualization: 7
Lighting: 8

Overall: 7.5

May 14 14 05:44 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

J Millman Photography wrote:
Hit me!

Millman:
You have the artist's visualization. And we need to improve on the execution - what say?

Port: 6
Camera angles: 6.5
COnceptualization:7
Lighting: 7

Overall; 6

May 14 14 05:47 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Daniel Pierce wrote:
How are we doing now?

Thanks,

-D.Pierce

Your port needs some variety. And maybe (in my opinion) some improvements on your expressions.

Looks: 7
Figure: 8.5
Port: 7
Expressions: 6.5

Overall: 7

May 14 14 05:50 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Julia Weber wrote:
You didn't rate me I'd really appreciate the critique

I am sorry - but read the original post. No exceptions.

May 14 14 05:51 pm Link

Model

Julia Weber

Posts: 48

Indianapolis, Indiana, US

Digital Blitz wrote:

I am sorry - but read the original post. No exceptions.

I'm only 19 so do SHIELD MY ADOLESCENT EARS

May 14 14 05:58 pm Link

Photographer

LVL Photography

Posts: 47

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

I find these threads so interesting. 

Appreciate your feedback.

And can I just saw that I am in awe of you for continuing with the thread for this long.  Wow.

May 14 14 06:30 pm Link

Photographer

J Millman Photography

Posts: 198

Norwich, England, United Kingdom

Digital Blitz wrote:

Millman:
You have the artist's visualization. And we need to improve on the execution - what say?

Port: 6
Camera angles: 6.5
COnceptualization:7
Lighting: 7

Overall; 6

Thanks for your comment and thoughts.
I agree totally!
I need more 'time in the field'...practice, practice, practice....
smile

May 15 14 05:03 am Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

LVL Photography wrote:
I find these threads so interesting. 

Appreciate your feedback.

And can I just saw that I am in awe of you for continuing with the thread for this long.  Wow.

Thanks. I started this out of boredom - but started to enjoy this. Gives me the opportunity to visit awesome ports - yours included.

You conceptualization is also awesome. But you need to improve in the post production department - I am not too sure about your cropping either.

Port: 7.5
Lighting: 7.5
COnceptualization: 8
Camera angles: 6
Post production: 5

Overall: 6.5

May 15 14 05:18 am Link

Photographer

LVL Photography

Posts: 47

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Digital Blitz wrote:

Thanks. I started this out of boredom - but started to enjoy this. Gives me the opportunity to visit awesome ports - yours included.

You conceptualization is also awesome. But you need to improve in the post production department - I am not too sure about your cropping either.

Port: 7.5
Lighting: 7.5
COnceptualization: 8
Camera angles: 6
Post production: 5

Overall: 6.5

Thank you for being so honest.

May 15 14 07:45 pm Link

Model

Blaire_

Posts: 343

Portland, Oregon, US

me please??

May 16 14 01:14 pm Link

Photographer

Solas

Posts: 10390

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

hit me

May 16 14 01:18 pm Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30131

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

I will play game

May 16 14 01:23 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Blitz

Posts: 2773

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

Blaire_ wrote:
me please??

Blaire:
Port: 7.5
Looks: 8
Figure: 9
Expressions: 8

Overall: 8

May 16 14 05:10 pm Link