Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Post and I'll select a representative photo of yours and point out at least one good thing and one bad thing about it. (don't post if the majority of your portfolio is nudes) If you find my reply useful, feel free to help me out as well.
Model
Jane Smithly
Posts: 1097
Crowley, Texas, US
I would greatly appreciate you input
Model
a r i e l
Posts: 42
San Jose, California, US
I'd love to know your opinion
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Autumn Rose Brightly wrote: I would greatly appreciate you input Good: What has potential to be a good smile if practiced and developed Bad: Clumsy, apparently thoughtless posing
Model
LisaInLondon
Posts: 707
London, England, United Kingdom
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Ariel Yu wrote: I'd love to know your opinion Good: quality photography lets us see you well Bad: mostly you just sort of stand around, occasionally with one arm in your hair; develop some poses
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
LizaK wrote: Interested! Good: quirky, unique look can result in charming, delightful expressions Bad: we don't get much of a sense of your body or posing ability
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
I'd be honored if you hit me with some feedback. :bracing:
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
In Balance Photography wrote: I'm in Good: high quality, sharp, good colours, captivating Bad: all let down by a lack of that final level of retouching polish, so that it becomes actually unflattering to the model
Model
Rhi G
Posts: 62
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
I would love your feedback.
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Maria Susanti wrote: tell me? Good: can look cute as a button Bad: you look best in this self-pic because the retouching/make-up in your others obliterates the shape of your face
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Orca Bay Images wrote: I'd be honored if you hit me with some feedback. :bracing: Good: you got an interesting expression out of this girl Bad: the lighting and retouching are bad/indifferent and she looks like some random amateur girl
Model
Rei L
Posts: 264
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
Sendu wrote: Good: you got an interesting expression out of this girl Bad: the lighting and retouching are bad/indifferent and she looks like some random amateur girl Thank you for your feedback!
Model
Lela Jesse
Posts: 1148
Shasta Lake, California, US
I would love if you could do this for me. Thank you!
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Rhiana Gray wrote: I would love your feedback. Hard to pick a representative photo; you're all over the place. Good: you can look really good, with just the right expression to beguile Bad: a lot of the time, expression and pose misses the mark resulting in something, if not quite unflattering, then at least boring
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Yin L wrote: Yes please! Good: you know how to pose and emote, are adventurous and when it works, it really works amazingly well Bad: but when it misses the mark, it can be really quite horrible (but this is more about shot selection by the photographer I think)
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Lela Jesse wrote: I would love if you could do this for me. Thank you! Good: can look lovely in unforced "candid" poses Bad: almost every time you look directly into camera you get something that verges on the horrible
Model
HEATHER 19
Posts: 1156
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
HEATHER 18 wrote: Sounds -good and helpful Good: body Bad: dull, lifeless expression
Model
Lela Jesse
Posts: 1148
Shasta Lake, California, US
Sendu wrote: Lela Jesse wrote: I would love if you could do this for me. Thank you! Good: can look lovely in unforced "candid" poses Bad: almost every time you look directly into camera you get something that verges on the horrible [/quote Thank you very much.
Model
Maruschke
Posts: 543
Darfield, Canterbury, New Zealand
Model
Maggie Xia
Posts: 452
Atlanta, Georgia, US
could you please take a look at my port please?
Photographer
Tim Foster
Posts: 1816
Orlando, Florida, US
Model
Jen B
Posts: 4474
Phoenix, Arizona, US
I like your "Good" and "Bad" advice. My port is mostly non-nude. Thank you, Jen p.s. however, I think I already know what the 'bad' is but, I'm working on it and would like to see what you say.
Photographer
Prestigeshots
Posts: 211
Austin, Texas, US
I'd like to know, thanks!
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Maruschke wrote: Me? :-) Good: smile can look cute when not strained too far Bad: most photos look a little amateurish
Photographer
Steve Wall
Posts: 644
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
OK, hit me
Photographer
Sendu
Posts: 3530
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Claire- Marie wrote: Please! You look like 2 completely different people in your port, so it's hard to pick a representative photo; which is the real you? Good: you can look pretty in a natural commercial-style shoot Bad: much less effective at other things
Model
Semele
Posts: 161
Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
Model
Ashley Canright
Posts: 48
Houston, Texas, US
Hey! I'd love to know what you think! Go for it
|