Forums >
Photography Talk >
question about models
I have a simple question: what are general rules when photographing an underage model? I'm not sure and I figured I should make sure before I do the shoot. Thanks. Aug 19 05 06:00 pm Link Robert_Vega wrote: Well. I require an underage model to be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian for the entire shoot. So I leave it up to the parent. But in the event that the parent let the model make that decision, I've always been told that if a girl can legally wear a certain garment/outfit in public, I can legally photograph her in it. I've heard, but I'm not sure if it's true, that if a girl under 18 is married and/or has a child, she is legally an adult. That might vary from state to state though. Aug 19 05 06:08 pm Link Freelancer wrote: I know in NY its legal for minors to be in about what a bakini covers. No genitals or nipples and no peitration.If you dont pass those boundries your fine.You can even photograph them as smexy as you like,so long as there isnt anything "explicit" about the img. No touching of the "nono"areas in "that way" and your fine as well. Aug 19 05 06:31 pm Link Just don't ask her to take her clothes off. Seriously. I wouldn't shoot her in lingerie either but swimwear is okay. Paul Aug 19 05 06:38 pm Link Robert_Vega wrote: Do not, under any circumstances, fuck them. Aug 19 05 06:38 pm Link Kassandra wrote: A regular bikini. Not a thong. Right? Aug 19 05 06:38 pm Link Paul Ferrara wrote: I agree with you about the lingerie. But I have seen 16 & 17 year olds with lingerie pics in their ports. Aug 19 05 06:40 pm Link BlacklistVisual wrote: Was this meant as a joke answer to a real question? Robert_Vega wrote: Check with your local laws and check them as often as you can, because they change at times without much notice or warning to the public. Aug 19 05 06:48 pm Link Craig Thomson wrote: Was this meant as a real answer to a real question with possible legal implications? Aug 19 05 06:53 pm Link Is it legal for the model to be nude, but having nothing showing on the picture, like implied nudity? :-| Aug 19 05 06:57 pm Link Y'know, man... I gotta give you my honest answer here, because it sounds like you're opening yourself up to a lotta shit that nobody wants to deal with. You're looking for general rules to your simple question. I have a simple rule I stick to, no question. Do not shoot underage models. That's it. Hold out til you find someone over 18. It's really not that hard to do. Save yourself the world of shit you could be landing yourself in and just don't shoot them. If you look at my shit, I've got 1 photo with kids in it. And I made sure that the image didn't have have even the slightest tinge of anything that could be misconstrued as innapropriate sexuality. If you're looking for something running the gamut, just don't. Shoot implied with some chick who turned 18 this morning. In the long run, you'll be happier. Because fighting that shit out could be hell. Aug 19 05 07:05 pm Link BlacklistVisual: sounds good. Aug 19 05 07:15 pm Link Yeah. I know. Live by it. Aug 19 05 07:18 pm Link Thongs are fine as well so long as you dont have any um.. wardrobe misfunctions i believe ppl are calling it? Always pre aprove the skimper things with the gardiant before hand. Most of the time its fine, ppl make shooting minors into a horror story it isnt. Aug 19 05 11:06 pm Link Kassandra wrote: All minors say that. Aug 19 05 11:09 pm Link Just avoid it if it's for TFP. If it's an agency girl and/or a paid shoot, then it's a different story all together. Aug 19 05 11:17 pm Link 1)I never shoot a minor w/out a parent around. 2)If she is an emancipated adult, get and copy her papers! 3)File them with her photos-forever! 4)Ask yourself if this is worth it. Aug 19 05 11:32 pm Link Have the parent of legal guardian sign the release forms/be there at the shoot. If not, have them accompanied by someone who is over 18, and have an assistant/witness there for you as well. It is NOT illegal to shoot minors for artistic nudes. Most photographers just avoid shooting minors altogether to avoid any potential problems. Fair enough. But there are no laws about photographing nude minors in a non-sexual manner. The problem then lies in how people conceive sexuality, yadda yadda... Aug 19 05 11:42 pm Link Robert_Vega wrote: General rules: Aug 19 05 11:42 pm Link Xi wrote: I guess that's how that photographer legally photographed Brooke Shields nude when she was only 10. Aug 21 05 10:13 am Link BlacklistVisual wrote: I used to feel the same way about working with underage models. But they are easier to schedule for summer because they don't have full time jobs & requiring a parent/guardian to attend decreases the chances of the model not showing up for the shoot. Aug 21 05 10:17 am Link Kassandra wrote: This brings up another advantage to requiring a parent/guardian be present for the entire shoot. Only clothes approved by the parent will be brought to the shoot. Aug 21 05 10:23 am Link Robert_Vega wrote: Rule # 1- laws vary with location. Aug 23 05 02:51 am Link Yeah I agree. Have the underage model bring a parent or guardian. Aug 23 05 03:18 am Link |