Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
EdwardKristopher wrote: I just realized that you haven't uploaded a picture since March of 2012? Ur too funni! :-) All these Amateurs and GWPW and worse that are out here! It's incredible that you are even able to look at all these Crappy Ports without throwing up in you mouth... I hope you have some Pepto Bismol for after looking at these pictures. All the Best! Edward Looks like we have a whiner.
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Jorge Kreimer wrote: To show models that I can shoot in a wide variety of styles. if only that were true, "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes" saying "variety of styes" a bunch of times does not make for a variety of words. Please tell me what these styles are.
Photographer
Portrait Shooter
Posts: 191
Rialto, California, US
I will have a go if you are still at it.
Photographer
Steve Thompson
Posts: 562
Los Angeles, California, US
David Pollack wrote: if only that were true, "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes", "variety of styes" saying "variety of styes" a bunch of times does not make for a variety of words. Please tell me what these styles are. Variety of styes?!?!? That sounds painful.
Photographer
Ivan Galaviz - Photo
Posts: 891
Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico
Dude (OP) Why do you put yourself in this horrible position? Having to look at those portfolios just hurts... (not saying I'm better) but why do you like to inflict self pain?
Photographer
PTPhotoUT
Posts: 1961
Salt Lake City, Utah, US
Photographer
Portrait Shooter
Posts: 191
Rialto, California, US
Your port is pretty damn good Ivan
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
David Pollack wrote: Looks like we have a whiner. More like a Winer! ;-)~
Photographer
AJ Jenkins
Posts: 227
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
I'm game
Photographer
Worlds Of Water
Posts: 37732
Rancho Cucamonga, California, US
Cute title...
Photographer
Steven Barrett
Posts: 561
LONG ISLAND CITY, New York, US
Why not. I'm not depressed enough today.
Photographer
madheiress
Posts: 272
Saxapahaw, North Carolina, US
I already know I'm an amateur (albeit one intent on improving) but I'm always curious to hear .02 from others.
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Radar1923 wrote: I will have a go if you are still at it. please NO, NO, seriously, NO, NO, NO GWPW
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Ivan Galaviz - Photo wrote: Dude (OP) Why do you put yourself in this horrible position? Having to look at those portfolios just hurts... (not saying I'm better) but why do you like to inflict self pain? ay carumba, nuf said
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
PTPhotoUT wrote: Have some fun with mine. very experienced at? gwpw
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Radar1923 wrote: Your port is pretty damn good Ivan WTF? Ivan, you owe this guy a drink. Hey radar, you want to take over here, go for it. I bet you think Taco Bell is pretty damn good eating and paint by number by a 7 year old pretty damn good art. GWPW
Photographer
Glenn Worton
Posts: 1444
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Photographer
Fotografica Gregor
Posts: 4126
Alexandria, Virginia, US
if you're still going.....
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Steven Barrett wrote: Just a few more? Please? and I quote from your page "I'm an amateur photographer. I work only tfp. If I had money I would pay models but I wouldn't want to be hired as a photographer. I don't find that very satisfying." WTF? With an attitude like that I won't bother to look at your images. Define yourself -- maybe Radar will tell you how wonderful you are. Have at it.
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Glenn Worton wrote: I'l try you - yes, yes you do try me. GWPW
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Fotografica Gregor wrote: if you're still going..... I wish I had gone. amateur
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
Wicked LA Photography wrote: MEEEE YOUUUUU. you claim to have "done over 6000+ shoots." This is what you have to show for it? Why does the expression "even the sun shines on a dogs ass once in a while" now feel so painfully hollow? Just asking. gwpw
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
David Pollack wrote: YOUUUUU. you claim to have "done over 6000+ shoots." This is what you have to show for it? Why does the expression "even the sun shines on a dogs ass once in a while" now feel so painfully hollow? Just asking. gwpw Not 1 Person is better than a GWPW and yet your work is so extravagantly wonderful? I always wonder why we seek acceptance from those that have no clue in their own right?! :-) YOU my Rude and Obnoxious GWaHUGEPW should have this thread shut down! I'm just sayin...! :-)~
Photographer
Beautiful Boudoir
Posts: 119
Quincy, Massachusetts, US
I am game an would love to hear your thoughts.
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
EdwardKristopher wrote: Not 1 Person is better than a GWPW and yet your work is so extravagantly wonderful? I always wonder why we seek acceptance from those that have no clue in their own right?! :-) YOU my Rude and Obnoxious GWaHUGEPW should have this thread shut down! I'm just sayin...! :-)~ Looks like we have a whiner. Let's make it simple, of your 244 photos, please tell us which one, just one, any one, a single one, has professional qualities? Seriously, come on, realistically, show us just one that is well lit, well styled, well produced, has proper post-production. Just one. You name it and we will all go look and tell you have wonderful you are. You want someone to tell you how great you are, go ask your mama. You want the truth, just ask and I am sure pretty much anyone with knowledge of professional photography will be happy to give it to you. By the way, you are correct, the people that ask in this forum are NOT professionals, they don't need to hear what I have to say. Have you looked at the photos of the posters before you got your panties in a twist? Stop whining, don't like what I think, great, you have every right to feel that way.
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
beautifulboudoir wrote: I am game an would love to hear your thoughts. unrelated trivia, Fig Newtons were originally made in Quincy but they did not like the name Fig Quincys. Seriously. What do you want me to say, 3 shoots, no visible knowledge of light, styling, digital production. Come on you know. GWPW
Photographer
Beautiful Boudoir
Posts: 119
Quincy, Massachusetts, US
David Pollack wrote: unrelated trivia, Fig Newtons were originally made in Quincy but they did not like the name Fig Quincys. Seriously. What do you want me to say, 3 shoots, no visible knowledge of light, styling, digital production. Come on you know. GWPW I appreciate the feedback...working on getting better so always good to hear what areas others feel I need the most work.
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
beautifulboudoir wrote: I appreciate the feedback...working on getting better so always good to hear what areas others feel I need the most work. :-)
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
David Pollack wrote: Looks like we have a whiner. Let's make it simple, of your 244 photos, please tell us which one, just one, any one, a single one, has professional qualities? Seriously, come on, realistically, show us just one that is well lit, well styled, well produced, has proper post-production. Just one. You name it and we will all go look and tell you have wonderful you are. You want someone to tell you how great you are, go ask your mama. You want the truth, just ask and I am sure pretty much anyone with knowledge of professional photography will be happy to give it to you. By the way, you are correct, the people that ask in this forum are NOT professionals, they don't need to hear what I have to say. Have you looked at the photos of the posters before you got your panties in a twist? Stop whining, don't like what I think, great, you have every right to feel that way. Too-Flipping-Funny! ;-)
Photographer
BIP
Posts: 3748
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Photographer
Rik Williams
Posts: 4005
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
EdwardKristopher wrote: Too-Flipping-Funny! ;-) Edward, give it a rest, this is David's critique thread, no one is interested in reading your opinion on his. So please, just pack up your baggage and move on. Or better yet, start your own pro, am, gwpw thread. I'll gladly take up first spot on the grid if you like.
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
Rik Williams wrote: Edward, give it a rest, this is David's critique thread, no one is interested in reading your opinion on his. So please, just pack up your baggage and move on. Or better yet, start your own pro, am, gwpw thread. I'll gladly take up first spot on the grid if you like. Hey! I think that's a good idea! I think I'll do that...NOT! Thanks for YOUR opinion. :-)
Photographer
David Pollack
Posts: 1933
Wilmington, Delaware, US
EdwardKristopher wrote: Too-Flipping-Funny! ;-) EK is still whining but we are all still waiting for him to identify just one shot of of his 244 that he thinks is professionally done. Ah well, we have a very long wait coming.
|