EdwardKristopher wrote:

Hey!  I think that's a good idea!  I think I'll do that...NOT!  Thanks for YOUR opinion.  :-)

In addition to listening to Riks opinion, you might try looking at this images. You could learn from both. His images are cleanly lit, decenltly designed  and it is obvious he has put some thought into them.  I stand by my "amateur" ranking for him BUT he is at least working towards something and might have a chance of becoming a professional.

The Lightstyle wrote:
Hurt me!

too late, I think you have already hurt yourself.

gwpw

Decay of Memory wrote:
Another fun thread, this ones worth reading through.

you get your classification.

Thanks for at least trying to create something, keep shooting, keep only the best and get rid of anything you think is not as good as you are currentky shooting.

Ella Wilkes Photography wrote:
*Holds breath and hopes for the best...*

Please learn to edit, you do not need to have 6 similars from a shoot, if you can't pick the best, then none are good enough.

swpw (sheila with paper weight, I think I have the vencaular correct) BUT you could upgrade youself to amateur just by dumping all but your best 10 shots.

David Pollack wrote:

Please learn to edit, you do not need to have 6 similars from a shoot, if you can't pick the best, then none are good enough.

swpw (sheila with paper weight, I think I have the vencaular correct) BUT you could upgrade youself to amateur just by dumping all but your best 10 shots.

Ok, I like to show diversity, I'll cut down some more.

Thanks... Not sure if I should be offended by that title but appreciate the time.

PicturePerfectImage wrote:
Curious on your feedback

hey finally reasonably lit, styled and produced images.

small "p" professional, not gonna get hired by any magazine, ad agency etc but you deserve to get paid by models who want vanity photos.

David M Russell wrote:
Go.

you get paid for what you do, right? that gives you pro status.

Location Photography wrote:
Amateur, hobbyist....where do I stand?  ~Gary

Boy do I miss Jeramiah's, used to get to Paducah regularly for a corporate client. Too bad they closed several years ago.

Where do you stand? Not far enough away from your camera. GWPW

maker-creator wrote:
Always interested in a good critique.

If you only want a good critique, look elsewhere, if you want an honest critique, here goes:

Amateur snapshots.

BIP wrote:
I got skipped

sorry, did not mean to skip you, what happened is that becuase you are in Australia, it is the middle of the night here when it is the middle of the day there and your post only appears 12 hours later.

GWPW, oh wait, you say you are a full time professional and you must know  --- nah, I'll stick with GWPW

David Pollack wrote:

sorry, did not mean to skip you, what happened is that becuase you are in Australia, it is the middle of the night here when it is the middle of the day there and your post only appears 12 hours later.

GWPW, oh wait, you say you are a full time professional and you must know  --- nah, I'll stick with GWPW

Thanks for the critique
ps I made over $90k last year from photography

Ariadne Photography wrote:
I think you skipped me too

keep working on it, nice clean images, try not to be quite so heavy handed, but better than 99% here.


amateur on the way

Colm Gavin wrote:
Include me in the fun and games

"casual photographer" = amateur

have fun, thanks for being honest

BIP wrote:

Thanks for the critique
ps I made over $90k last year from photography

looks like we have a whiner... 

don't recall anyone asking how much you made, but I bet you drive a really cool car and have a big sword

David Pollack wrote:

50 photos, every single one exactly the same in their feeling, now that is impressive.

gwpw

And what a pretty paper weight it is

David Pollack wrote:

looks like we have a whiner... 

don't recall anyone asking how much you made, but I bet you drive a really cool car and have a big sword

Thanks david
I particularly love all of your "art nudes" they are so well executed

Trill Imagery Ent wrote:
im in

amateur

Shirin McBennett-Sheen wrote:
Skipped me?

He's just critiquing photographers.

1472 wrote:
I'm in ... Seems funny

amateur

Forty-Six and 2 wrote:
Hit me.

okay, I hope this makes sense. Stop trying so hard. You seem to want to say something but confuse it by forcing the photos.

amateur

Houseofclem wrote:
Give it to me straight

Put down the camera, GWPW.

There is that straight enough?