aguynamededdy wrote:
so that's why i don't have alot of hits....no T&A shots. damn!

no that's not the theory. It is not that simple. The theory is about p**sy shots, if some thinks they might be able to see it when they enlarge the picture that is the one they will enlarge. Even if your pictures are all nude viewers prefer the p**sy shot.

The Thorny Rose wrote:
actually in my case, the pic with the most hits isn't a T&A shot... it is a bit of a provacative pose though... so this theory may be somewhat right.

i looked at your porfolio aand i would say it is further evidence for the theory in that the picture that has the most views is the one that has the highest possibility of seeing a spread.

Hugh  Jorgen wrote:
If you read the forums you will find that most are not people because they would never have sex or look at nude photos..
Or at least thats what they would have you belive..lol

Apparently they really are human underneath those hard shells they wear.

Eroticist Films wrote:
I have LOTS of nudes, but NOBODY ever comes over to visit.

Maybe I live on the wrong side of the tracks?!?!?!

I visited...  LOL

Eroticist Films wrote:
I have LOTS of nudes, but NOBODY ever comes over to visit.

Made me look!
Try complaining again and see if you can make me look again.

Lee-Bonaventure1 wrote:
On a site on -another network- I found that images which were up-skirts of sorts, or featured models deliberately showing their panties...these seemed to get more hits than topless. 

Any feedback on this phenomenon ?

Seems to fit the theory, which is that the picture in any given portfolio that prmomises the highest possibility of seeing genetelia always gets the hit.

Beau wrote:
As odd as it may sound I think the image that gets the most hits on my page shows no skin... I have tons of skin but people look at the picture of Collin... Male model with his cloths on...

I lloked at your excellent portfolio and you are right. I have no idea why this is true unless the male model loves to look at his own image or he has a huge fan.

Hel Inferna wrote:
That is definatly not the case in my portfolio.

You've got a really cool portfolio, but I don't think it has anything to say about the theory cause there's no chance of seeing any crotch at all

Craig Thomson wrote:

Maybe the better thing to do would be ban any nudity on a site that’s directed at hosting marketable artist to try and keep the focus on getting a mainstream job that pays and not filling portfolios with filler and fluff.

Could there be a need for AltModelMayhem?

I for one, could do without seeing any T&A in a portfolio that’s supposed to be supporting either the models best interest or the photographer as a serious artist with a sense of fashion.
Does it really matter who looks at what and does you know what with their thingy?
If a model wants to have the Maxium look, let the goo fly.

Let the art speak for it’s self or let it die…

“opens the hate mail box and waitsâ€?

I think thats an excellent idea.  I am not opposed to nudes, but not all nudes are art.  Heck not all photos are art.

Lora wrote:
Yes, my most explicit pic (though it doesn't show that much) has over 600 hits.

Well ...................actualy 601         woohoo like the legs

Brian Diaz wrote:
Wolfie's a perv.

wolves always perv in packs ask little red riding model

Dyanov wrote:

wolves always perv in packs ask little red riding model

Are you talking about shootouts?

Dyanov wrote:
wolves always perv in packs ask little red riding model

Brian Diaz wrote:
Are you talking about shootouts?

Does little red riding model have any upskirt shots? If so whats her MM#             LOL

PDXImaging wrote:
LOL, all I know is an image I posted in response to this post has had over 500 hits in a week...

You're on your way to testing the theory, now what you need to do is fill your entire portfolio with only crotch shots and see what types of crotch shots get the most hits. It's for science.....

mrclay2000 wrote:
Yes, the old refrain. I could put up a great sunset photo of a interesting building like a countryside red barn glowing in the sun with wondrous colors, but put this beside even the hint of cleavage and the barn is doomed. Doesn't matter if the colors on the cleavage are lurid and the detail grainy, the boobs beat the better barn hands down.

Do you have a picture of your sun set barn, place next to your cleavage shot, or better still photshop the cleavage on to the roof of the burn. You could call the shot the red breast barn, or setting cleavage.