This thread was locked on 2011-12-16 22:54:37
Model
J U L E S
Posts: 4847
Petaluma, California, US
David Shinobi wrote: For Thursday.... It was 30something degrees when I took this yesterday
VOTE.
Photographer
Bobby Porto
Posts: 1884
Columbus, Ohio, US
Photographer
J O H N A L L A N
Posts: 12221
Los Angeles, California, US
DarioImpiniPhotography wrote: Vote
Photographer
Cams Camera
Posts: 744
Marietta, Georgia, US
I am a little confused on an entry on yesterdays contest..Rules state no bare buttocks, 1. No mature (18+) images or links as defined by Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines found here. Mature images include: - female nipple or areola - bare buttocks (thong or not) I am sorry but I see a lot of bare butt..Don't get me wrong, the shot was fantastic but we all know the rules but yet voted on an image that should not be allowed in my opinion. NOT that my opinion does count so what ever.. So..I guess we can all now post shots of similar models without being DQ'd, correct? Carry on....lol
Model
TSJK
Posts: 6218
MacMurdo - permanent station of the US, Sector claimed by New Zealand, Antarctica
Photographer
Cams Camera
Posts: 744
Marietta, Georgia, US
David Shinobi wrote: For Thursday.... It was 30something degrees when I took this yesterday
vote
Photographer
David Hirsh
Posts: 2379
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Cams Camera wrote: I am a little confused on an entry on yesterdays contest..Rules state no bare buttocks, 1. No mature (18+) images or links as defined by Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines found here. Mature images include: - female nipple or areola - bare buttocks (thong or not) I am sorry but I see a lot of bare butt..Don't get me wrong, the shot was fantastic but we all know the rules but yet voted on an image that should not be allowed in my opinion. NOT that my opinion does count so what ever.. So..I guess we can all now post shots of similar models without being DQ'd, correct? Carry on....lol Tom is the ultimate judge of what is acceptable, but in my time playing/viewing the forum-based contest, it's clear that it is a little more relaxed than the gallery-style version. There's certainly no outright 18+ style nudity allowed here, but a little bum crack/thong/somewhat visible areole-through-t-shirt is usually deemed okay here, particularly if it's in good taste. No one seems to really push the envelope too much, so perhaps that's why the rules are a little more liberal compared to the fairly stringent gallery-style contest, where in both the 18+ and the regular versions, it seems there's a daily battle as to what is allowed due to various members brazenly testing the waters on a constant basis. Cheers, David Hirsh
Photographer
T R Willmitch
Posts: 7173
Normal, Illinois, US
Cams Camera wrote: I am a little confused on an entry on yesterdays contest..Rules state no bare buttocks, 1. No mature (18+) images or links as defined by Model Mayhem's mature image guidelines found here. Mature images include: - female nipple or areola - bare buttocks (thong or not) I am sorry but I see a lot of bare butt..Don't get me wrong, the shot was fantastic but we all know the rules but yet voted on an image that should not be allowed in my opinion. NOT that my opinion does count so what ever.. So..I guess we can all now post shots of similar models without being DQ'd, correct? Carry on....lol There was a complaint filed with me regarding yesterday’s winning image. Thus I made the long and treacherous hot-air flight to Kansas to hobnob with my fellow wizards. After discussion the conclusion reached is that the image is acceptable by current image guidelines, although just barely. While at the same time the image is not acceptable as an avatar – which is held to stricter standards. The current mature-image rule concerning bare buttocks is a vexing one to enforce since there is so much variation in clothing designs. A thong with a narrow string is too revealing, while full-cut panties are fine. The problem falls in between the two. And again, in this particular case the moderators feel that the image is acceptable.
Photographer
L Raye
Posts: 5045
Petaluma, California, US
CW Images wrote: Vote
Photographer
Mark Bradfield
Posts: 16
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
David Hirsh wrote: Vote
Model
Stacie Marie
Posts: 954
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
Lusk Photo wrote: I just saw Stacie's picture I'm sad I didn't get to vote for it Good job Stacie!!! aww thanks, Matt! and thanks to everyone else for the votes yesterday
Model
Stacie Marie
Posts: 954
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
Dan K Photography wrote: vote
Photographer
Mission Photography
Posts: 2653
Mission Viejo, California, US
David Shinobi wrote: For Thursday.... It was 30something degrees when I took this yesterday
Got my VOTE
Photographer
Cams Camera
Posts: 744
Marietta, Georgia, US
David Hirsh wrote: Tom is the ultimate judge of what is acceptable, but in my time playing/viewing the forum-based contest, it's clear that it is a little more relaxed than the gallery-style version. There's certainly no outright 18+ style nudity allowed here, but a little bum crack/thong/somewhat visible areole-through-t-shirt is usually deemed okay here, particularly if it's in good taste. No one seems to really push the envelope too much, so perhaps that's why the rules are a little more liberal compared to the fairly stringent gallery-style contest, where in both the 18+ and the regular versions, it seems there's a daily battle as to what is allowed due to various members brazenly testing the waters on a constant basis. Cheers, David Hirsh
Photographer
Cams Camera
Posts: 744
Marietta, Georgia, US
Photographer
Cams Camera
Posts: 744
Marietta, Georgia, US
Cams Camera wrote:
I can appreciate that..I just see rules in black and white and have tried to bend a few myself..with no winning results..lol anyway..I just want things to be fair..So on with good taste!
Photographer
Cams Camera
Posts: 744
Marietta, Georgia, US
T R Willmitch wrote: There was a complaint filed with me regarding yesterday’s winning image. Thus I made the long and treacherous hot-air flight to Kansas to hobnob with my fellow wizards. After discussion the conclusion reached is that the image is acceptable by current image guidelines, although just barely. While at the same time the image is not acceptable as an avatar – which is held to stricter standards. The current mature-image rule concerning bare buttocks is a vexing one to enforce since there is so much variation in clothing designs. A thong with a narrow string is too revealing, while full-cut panties are fine. The problem falls in between the two. And again, in this particular case the moderators feel that the image is acceptable. OK..thanks for all your efforts!
Photographer
eekimelphoto
Posts: 869
Sarasota, Florida, US
CW Images wrote: Vote
Photographer
Peter Schroeder
Posts: 3453
New York, New York, US
IntheMomentPhotography wrote: "From my Body these Miracles were Born" A series of my Children
vote
Photographer
Bellinger
Posts: 2248
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
David Hirsh wrote: Vote
Photographer
T R Willmitch
Posts: 7173
Normal, Illinois, US
Bobby Porto wrote: Model: Jasmine. "Beauty and the Geek" winner, Cycle 4. Beautiful! Vote. Take care, Tom
Photographer
T R Willmitch
Posts: 7173
Normal, Illinois, US
Congratulations goes to CW Images for the first-place win on Thursday, December 8, 2011! Second-place honors go to David Shinobi! Thank you to everyone who took part in the competition. Great images! First Place – CW Images Second Place – David Shinobi Vote Count for Thursday, December 8, 2011: Aaron Downing - 1 Bobby Porto - 1 CW Images - 6 Dan K Photography - 1 DarioImpiniPhotography - 1 David Hirsh - 3 David Shinobi - 4 IntheMomentPhotography - 2 Lil Miss Jade - 3 Mike Stewart 247 Foto - 1 Come see all of the Model Mayhem Picture of the Day first-place winning images displayed in the Winners' Gallery , hosted by Craig Seay. The complete Picture of the Day competition rules can be found on the first page of the thread by clicking here. The Picture of the Day competition has a discussion thread to share your thoughts. This is not a picture critique thread, but a place to explore how to better the contest itself. You'll find the Picture of the Day Discussion Zone at: Forums > Site Related Forum > Picture of the Day Discussion Zone
Photographer
ZZZPhotos
Posts: 1320
Marietta, Pennsylvania, US
Model
Tara Jayne
Posts: 8090
Lexington, Kentucky, US
For Friday:)
Photographer
ATDowning
Posts: 2373
Albuquerque, New Mexico, US
Friday...
Makeup Artist
Lex Ewing
Posts: 499
Greensboro, North Carolina, US
Friday ~ Lady Liberty Photographer: Paul Byun; Model: Myhang; Hair Stylist: Kyle Britt; MUA: me
Photographer
No One
Posts: 2086
Buckingham, Virginia, US
Night Shoot by Headlights Model: N I C O - MM#724343
Model
Stacie Marie
Posts: 954
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
Friday
Photographer
LC Photographics
Posts: 14
Spartanburg, South Carolina, US
Lex Ewing wrote: Friday ~ Lady Liberty Photographer: Paul Byun; Model: Myhang; Hair Stylist: Kyle Britt; MUA: me VOTE
Photographer
Ken Edgar
Posts: 2828
Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Photographer
Mark Bradfield
Posts: 16
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Frriday
Photographer
Mark Bradfield
Posts: 16
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
IntheMomentPhotography wrote: Night Shoot by Headlights Model: N I C O - MM#724343
Vote
Model
Vera Much
Posts: 364
Destruction Bay, Virgin Islands, US
|