Model
Mischa Marie
Posts: 7892
Sacramento, California, US
Presley ONeil wrote: One SI cover doesn't get you fame. Jiggling half naked on YouTube does.
Model
K Allende
Posts: 14172
Columbus, Ohio, US
Damon Banner wrote: in my mouth. I've said as much in this very thread! Suuuure.
Photographer
Art Silva
Posts: 10064
Santa Barbara, California, US
Greg Kolack wrote: I think that's an incredibly naive thing to say. Cheryl Tiegs Christie Brinkley Carol Alt Paulina Porizkova Elle MacPherson Kathy Ireland Rachel Hunter Tyra Banks Rebecca Romijn Ashley Richardson Heidi Klum All famous with the help of being on the SI Cover. All before YouTube even existed. In this case probably not, I haven't bought an SI mag in a over decade. If it weren't for TMZ and YouTube, I wouldn't have never heard of her. Sign of the times.
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
1namil wrote: There was a time when the industry had thicker models...maybe we will start to see a sway back to that trend. Good god I hope not. Keep them thin and tall. Let the bigger fuller ones keep to the sidelines.
Model
Mischa Marie
Posts: 7892
Sacramento, California, US
Borgia wrote: Good god I hope not. Keep them thin and tall. Let the bigger fuller ones keep to the sidelines. Goooosh youre a douche.
Photographer
GK photo
Posts: 31025
Laguna Beach, California, US
Art Silva Photography wrote: Why must you always my forum comments? So mister expert on lip reading, politics and technology, what is YOUR answer? What IS she 100% saying? and were you there to hear it? ...or are you just going with the cop out "wrong, try again" comment. Here let me post the Gif again for your study...
dude, no offense, but who are you? i just saw an attempt at lip reading. it just so (apparently) happened to be yours. the first utterance is not "that's a". i have no idea what she's actually saying, i just know you are wrong. jesus, dude; even the paranoid have enemies.
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Mischa Marie wrote: Goooosh youre a douche. You looking in the mirror again luv? Turn it backwards you will like it better.
Model
Mischa Marie
Posts: 7892
Sacramento, California, US
Borgia wrote: You looking in the mirror again luv? Turn it backwards you will like it better. Really? Never change, MM. Really.
Model
K Allende
Posts: 14172
Columbus, Ohio, US
GK photo wrote: dude, no offense, but who are you? i just saw an attempt at lip reading. it just so (apparently) happened to be yours. the first utterance is not "that's a". i have no idea what she's actually saying, i just know you are wrong. jesus, dude; even the paranoid have enemies. I don't care what she's saying, I just want her to keep bending over in that strapless bikini. bouncy bouncy bouncy
Photographer
GK photo
Posts: 31025
Laguna Beach, California, US
Isabel Allende wrote: I don't care what she's saying, I just want her to keep bending over in that strapless bikini. bouncy bouncy bouncy a freaking men!
Model
QuietAsKept
Posts: 5935
Baltimore, Maryland, US
People said the same shit about Tyra Banks I think that Kate looks beautiful.
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Mischa Marie wrote: Really? Never change, MM. Really. Really. Quite frankly I am tired of the bigger set trying to force their size onto everyone else. I don't find BIG attractive at all. If they want to be nude models that is fine if thats what is wanted but for me Thin and tall. Not a beach ball.
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
Borgia wrote: Really. Quite frankly I am tired of the bigger set trying to force their size onto everyone else. I don't find BIG attractive at all. If they want to be nude models that is fine if thats what is wanted but for me Thin and tall. Not a beach ball. Do you really think Kate is "forcing" her size onto everyone else?
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Orca Bay Images wrote: Do you really think Kate is "forcing" her size onto everyone else?
Nope not at all. Just some over sized MM models. I like Kate, wouldn't pick her for my work but she is beautiful. And stop with the nonsense. You use that way too much. Grow up.
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
Borgia wrote: And stop with the nonsense. You use that way too much. Then stop trolling.
Model
Mischa Marie
Posts: 7892
Sacramento, California, US
Borgia wrote: Really. Quite frankly I am tired of the bigger set trying to force their size onto everyone else. I don't find BIG attractive at all. If they want to be nude models that is fine if thats what is wanted but for me Thin and tall. Not a beach ball. If you don't like it, don't look. Really. Nobody is forcing anything on you. And guess what? Nobody gives a shit what you find attractive. Really. There is a way to state your preference without being a jerk.
Model
Mischa Marie
Posts: 7892
Sacramento, California, US
Borgia wrote: Nope not at all. Just some over sized MM models I like Kate, wouldn't pick her for my work but she is beautiful. And stop with the nonsense. You use that way too much. Grow up. You are trolling.
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Orca Bay Images wrote: Then stop trolling. Umm drop the sky is falling routine.
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Mischa Marie wrote: If you don't like it, don't look. Really. Nobody is forcing anything on you. And guess what? Nobody gives a shit what you find attractive. Really. There is a way to state your preference without being a jerk. I see so I am not allowed to state my preference while you and others may? ok
Model
Mischa Marie
Posts: 7892
Sacramento, California, US
Borgia wrote: I see so I am not allowed to state my preference while you and others may? ok Do you know how to read?
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Mischa Marie wrote: Do you know how to read? yes.
Photographer
Chicchowmein
Posts: 14585
Palm Beach, Florida, US
Borgia wrote: Nope not at all. Just some over sized MM models. I like Kate, wouldn't pick her for my work but she is beautiful. And stop with the nonsense. You use that way too much. Grow up. I am sure she would be heartbroken
Photographer
GK photo
Posts: 31025
Laguna Beach, California, US
i think kate's ample (heavenly) bosom would be very depressed to learn of all the angst in this thread.
Model
QuietAsKept
Posts: 5935
Baltimore, Maryland, US
Mischa Marie wrote: If you don't like it, don't look. Really. Nobody is forcing anything on you. And guess what? Nobody gives a shit what you find attractive. Really. There is a way to state your preference without being a jerk. +1
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
chicchowmein wrote: I am sure she would be heartbroken I doubt it. But if you think so have at it.
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Post hidden on Jul 19, 2012 07:20 am Reason: 18+ Images
Photographer
Borgia
Posts: 766
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Post hidden on Jul 19, 2012 07:20 am Reason: 18+ Images
Model
Jules NYC
Posts: 21617
New York, New York, US
Photographer
Aspect By Allanah
Posts: 2110
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Orca Bay Images wrote: Astounding. There have been MMer models who are grossly obese and some so homely they've been mistaken for men, yet they get the "You go, girl! You're beautiful!" treatment. Yet Kate gets treated like a no-name pig. I wish someone could explain it to me. +1 she's gorgeous. Not industry standard. but does a pretty good job of it. she's like what alot of MM glam models wish they could be. haha
Model
UGLY
Posts: 567
London, England, United Kingdom
well i wouldn't mind looking like her LOL . she's stunning
Model
Nyxxiiee
Posts: 1519
Denton, Texas, US
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Toxic Iifa wrote: Kinda looks like shes sucking in in that photo look at the angle Yes, she's a fat girl wannabe model who's probably had kids and everything. Are you fucking shittin me?
Model
-Nicole-
Posts: 19211
Madison, Wisconsin, US
dave phoenix wrote: exaaaaaaaaaactly. she doesn't have an hourglass shape or a well-defined waist. i just don't think "ooh look bouncing boobies!" is a very strong counterpoint. oh well. Not every woman has a well-defined waist
Photographer
Andialu
Posts: 14029
San Pedro, California, US
K E E L I N G wrote: Yes, she's a fat girl wannabe model who's probably had kids and everything. Are you fucking shittin me? I'm surprised she doesn't have type 2 diabetes by now. The lard ass.
Model
Jennifer Barker
Posts: 8010
Houston, Arkansas, US
This Girl Is Not Fat By Any Means
Photographer
SPRINGHEEL
Posts: 38224
Detroit, Michigan, US
cinema photography wrote: Magnificent
Photographer
Minx & Fox
Posts: 19067
Palm Springs, California, US
cinema photography wrote: Oh, this is right clicked and saved. A very handy card indeed.
Photographer
SPRINGHEEL
Posts: 38224
Detroit, Michigan, US
Nimue Elaine wrote: Oh, this is right clicked and saved. A very handy card indeed. Kate and I are a phenomenal couple
Model
The Dasha
Posts: 80
Mission Viejo, California, US
Art Silva Photography wrote: In this case probably not, I haven't bought an SI mag in a over decade. If it weren't for TMZ and YouTube, I wouldn't have never heard of her. Sign of the times. Me neither. I only found out about her after that Dougie video. As for SI covers, Irina Shayk isn't really as big in Russia as most people think.
Photographer
Laurence Moan
Posts: 7844
Huntington Beach, California, US
Page 6 KU.gif What is she saying here???
|