Forums > Critique > Fun and Games > Will rate your portfolio 1-100

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Title says all.
Return the favor if you'd like.

Sep 24 12 09:31 pm Link

Model

Cameron Mark Lewis

Posts: 337

San Francisco, California, US

I'll go first!

Sep 25 12 01:24 am Link

Model

Jordan Bunniie

Posts: 1693

Los Angeles, California, US

Sure. smile

Sep 25 12 01:34 am Link

Photographer

Seismic Images

Posts: 525

Morisset, New South Wales, Australia

Ok, thanks.

Sep 25 12 01:35 am Link

Model

Jenny Jannetty

Posts: 449

Roanoke, Virginia, US

Me please!  smile

Sep 25 12 02:30 am Link

Photographer

Neil Snape

Posts: 9473

Paris, Île-de-France, France

To infinity and beyond, but stop at 100 if you will.

Sep 25 12 02:42 am Link

Photographer

JIOPIX

Posts: 1183

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I'm in.

Sep 25 12 02:49 am Link

Photographer

dcsmooth

Posts: 1190

Detroit, Michigan, US

Please and thank you.

I rate yours as an 85, there are some very good shots.

Sep 25 12 05:53 am Link

Photographer

TDSImages

Posts: 856

Salt Lake City, Utah, US

me next?

Sep 25 12 08:09 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Cameron Mark Lewis wrote:
I'll go first!

90... you have a great variety of images.

Sep 25 12 10:20 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Jordan Bunniie wrote:
Sure. smile

92... i like you.

Sep 25 12 10:22 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Seismic Images wrote:
Ok, thanks.

80... I like a lot of your photos but a few throw me off.  Quality and concept doesn't stand out to me in this... very boring
http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pi … 0#24145550

Sep 25 12 10:25 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Jenny Jannetty wrote:
Me please!  smile

75... you have a lot of variety but so many of your images are low quality.  Too much blur, poor lighting, etc.  I'd work with better photographers to get more quality images that you can use.  Even if you only have five really great shots, its a lot better than twenty mediocre pictures.

Sep 25 12 10:26 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Neil Snape wrote:
To infinity and beyond, but stop at 100 if you will.

98.  I love your work a whole lot.

Sep 25 12 10:27 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

JIOPIX wrote:
I'm in.

82... I like some of your stuff but not a fan of the adult album.  Not classy

Sep 25 12 10:29 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

dcsmooth wrote:
Please and thank you.

I rate yours as an 85, there are some very good shots.

76.  I like that you use ordinary people, but lighting on a lot of shots isn't very good

Sep 25 12 10:31 am Link

Photographer

dgold

Posts: 10273

North Smithfield, Rhode Island, US

S'il vous plait...

Sep 25 12 10:32 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

TDSImages wrote:
me next?

80.  Nice, but nothing that sparks my interest. Lighting is too dark for me

Sep 25 12 10:32 am Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

dgold wrote:
S'il vous plait...

78.  Not sure how I feel about your work.  I like a some images but others not so much

Sep 25 12 10:33 am Link

Photographer

PHOTOPHUN1

Posts: 4

Wilmington, North Carolina, US

Let me know.
Thanks

Sep 25 12 10:36 am Link

Photographer

dgold

Posts: 10273

North Smithfield, Rhode Island, US

Kacy Anne wrote:

78.  Not sure how I feel about your work.  I like a some images but others not so much

...LOL - which is why Howard Johnson served 28-flavors of ice cream!
And, thank you for the consideration.

Sep 25 12 10:41 am Link

Photographer

JIOPIX

Posts: 1183

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Kacy Anne wrote:

82... I like some of your stuff but not a fan of the adult album.  Not classy

Fair enough.  Thank you for taking the time to look.  You have a lovely port BTW...

Sep 25 12 12:35 pm Link

Model

Cameron Mark Lewis

Posts: 337

San Francisco, California, US

Kacy Anne wrote:

90... you have a great variety of images.

Thank you! smile I give you a 91, very nice port, good variety

Sep 25 12 02:46 pm Link

Photographer

BIP

Posts: 3705

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Kacy Anne wrote:
Title says all.
Return the favor if you'd like.

Me please
I'd rate you an 87

Sep 25 12 02:59 pm Link

Model

Marciia Gringe

Posts: 390

Lloydminster, Alberta, Canada

me please

Sep 25 12 03:18 pm Link

Model

MickCetera

Posts: 276

Chicago, Illinois, US

Me... and if you see anything I can improve please let me know!

Sep 25 12 06:10 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

PHOTOPHUN1 wrote:
Let me know.
Thanks

75. Pretty girls but nothing special

Sep 25 12 08:10 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

BIP wrote:

Me please
I'd rate you an 87

84. 
Good portfolio but I don't like this image.  OUt of focus and it isn't very captivating.  http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pi … 9#26013279

Sep 25 12 08:12 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Marciia Gringe wrote:
me please

82.  Good but very generic modeling.  Nothing I Haven't seen before a hundred times on MM

Sep 25 12 08:13 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

MickCetera wrote:
Me... and if you see anything I can improve please let me know!

87.  Good variety in your portfolio. You have nice movement control.  I would suggest you work on facial expression - you have a good soft look, but work on bringing more intensity into your eyes.

Sep 25 12 08:14 pm Link

Photographer

AfterImage Media

Posts: 123

Aurora, Illinois, US

Take a look and let me know what you think. Your port is outstanding! I'd give it a 90!
Thanks

Sep 25 12 08:20 pm Link

Photographer

New Image Creations

Posts: 414

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Bring it on ....I'd give your portfolio a solid 88!

Sep 25 12 08:31 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

AfterImage Media wrote:
Take a look and let me know what you think. Your port is outstanding! I'd give it a 90!
Thanks

Thanks for the rating!

I'll give you a 74.  Your images look a lot like basic glamour shots.  Bring more light to your subject and work on making each model stand out from the background.

Sep 25 12 08:34 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

New Image Creations wrote:
Bring it on ....I'd give your portfolio a solid 88!

Id say 82.  Your work is solid, but it is missing something.  Lighting could be a whole lot better.

Sep 25 12 08:35 pm Link

Photographer

New Image Creations

Posts: 414

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Kacy Anne wrote:

Id say 82.  Your work is solid, but it is missing something.  Lighting could be a whole lot better.

Thanks...I'm working on some new lighting ideas....

Sep 25 12 08:36 pm Link

Photographer

Dan K Photography

Posts: 5466

STATEN ISLAND, New York, US

You are purty. What is my rating?

Sep 25 12 08:37 pm Link

Photographer

Fotografica Gregor

Posts: 4122

Alexandria, Virginia, US

why not?

Sep 25 12 08:42 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Dan K Photography wrote:
You are purty. What is my rating?

Thank you smile Solid 95.  I really love your work

Sep 25 12 08:45 pm Link

Model

Kacy A

Posts: 119

Los Angeles, California, US

Fotografica Gregor wrote:
why not?

90.  Totally dig your fashion work

Sep 25 12 08:47 pm Link

Model

Cole Morrison

Posts: 3958

Portland, Oregon, US

i would like to know, and why.

Sep 25 12 09:18 pm Link