Cameron Mark Lewis wrote:
I'll go first!

90... you have a great variety of images.

Jordan Bunniie wrote:
Sure.

92... i like you.

Seismic Images wrote:
Ok, thanks.

80... I like a lot of your photos but a few throw me off.  Quality and concept doesn't stand out to me in this... very boring
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/p … 0#24145550

Jenny Jannetty wrote:
Me please! 

75... you have a lot of variety but so many of your images are low quality.  Too much blur, poor lighting, etc.  I'd work with better photographers to get more quality images that you can use.  Even if you only have five really great shots, its a lot better than twenty mediocre pictures.

Neil Snape wrote:
To infinity and beyond, but stop at 100 if you will.

98.  I love your work a whole lot.

JIOPIX wrote:
I'm in.

82... I like some of your stuff but not a fan of the adult album.  Not classy

dcsmooth wrote:
Please and thank you.

I rate yours as an 85, there are some very good shots.

76.  I like that you use ordinary people, but lighting on a lot of shots isn't very good

TDSImages wrote:
me next?

80.  Nice, but nothing that sparks my interest. Lighting is too dark for me

dgold wrote:
S'il vous plait...

78.  Not sure how I feel about your work.  I like a some images but others not so much

Kacy Anne wrote:

78.  Not sure how I feel about your work.  I like a some images but others not so much

...LOL - which is why Howard Johnson served 28-flavors of ice cream!
And, thank you for the consideration.

Kacy Anne wrote:

82... I like some of your stuff but not a fan of the adult album.  Not classy

Fair enough.  Thank you for taking the time to look.  You have a lovely port BTW...

Kacy Anne wrote:

90... you have a great variety of images.

Thank you! I give you a 91, very nice port, good variety

Kacy Anne wrote:
Title says all.
Return the favor if you'd like.

Me please
I'd rate you an 87

PHOTOPHUN1 wrote:
Let me know.
Thanks

75. Pretty girls but nothing special

BIP wrote:

Me please
I'd rate you an 87

84. 
Good portfolio but I don't like this image.  OUt of focus and it isn't very captivating.  https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/p … 9#26013279

Marciia Gringe wrote:
me please

82.  Good but very generic modeling.  Nothing I Haven't seen before a hundred times on MM

MickCetera wrote:
Me... and if you see anything I can improve please let me know!

87.  Good variety in your portfolio. You have nice movement control.  I would suggest you work on facial expression - you have a good soft look, but work on bringing more intensity into your eyes.

AfterImage Media wrote:
Take a look and let me know what you think. Your port is outstanding! I'd give it a 90!
Thanks

Thanks for the rating!

I'll give you a 74.  Your images look a lot like basic glamour shots.  Bring more light to your subject and work on making each model stand out from the background.

New Image Creations wrote:
Bring it on ....I'd give your portfolio a solid 88!

Id say 82.  Your work is solid, but it is missing something.  Lighting could be a whole lot better.

Kacy Anne wrote:

Id say 82.  Your work is solid, but it is missing something.  Lighting could be a whole lot better.

Thanks...I'm working on some new lighting ideas....

Dan K Photography wrote:
You are purty. What is my rating?

Thank you Solid 95.  I really love your work

Fotografica Gregor wrote:
why not?

90.  Totally dig your fashion work