closed Oct 17 12 01:19 pm Link I would love to have your opinion. Oct 17 12 01:24 pm Link Thanks for the opinion!! Oct 17 12 01:29 pm Link Emmiq wrote: I would not go past your avatar. The expression is not enticing to me. Rather, you look mad. And a lot of hair in the face. It is not an image that draws me in. Sorry. Oct 17 12 01:29 pm Link TMA Photo and Retouch wrote: Absolutely. You have a nice close headshot with great work. It is attractive and it does make me want to see more of your work. This is a good choice. And it represents your port well. Oct 17 12 01:31 pm Link Love to know... Oct 17 12 01:34 pm Link Terrell Gates wrote: I would not go past your avatar. It is not something that catches my interest. I just see a skinny guy with odd lighting. Now I am not saying this is good or bad, but for me, it lacks the ability to catch my interest. But, after looking at your port, it does represent what you do. But my answer is no, sorry. Oct 17 12 01:36 pm Link I would love for you to take a look and give any advice. Oct 17 12 01:42 pm Link OK Oct 17 12 01:42 pm Link Go for it! Oct 17 12 01:44 pm Link Does it? Oct 17 12 01:49 pm Link of course it does. Oct 17 12 01:51 pm Link Count me in please. Oct 17 12 01:57 pm Link Kate Vaillencourt wrote: When I look at your avatar, I see a well lit attractive person. Close enough I can see what you look like. Very nice image, makes me want to enter your port. Oct 17 12 02:20 pm Link Jeff Fiore wrote: your avatar is really strange. It may cause people to enter just to see what you have. But for me, I just jump over it. I would not enter your port. Oct 17 12 02:22 pm Link Oct 17 12 02:25 pm Link Lea Eden wrote: Pore lighting and a crazy expression. Would not be my choice for an avatar. When I browse through models, the avatar has to show me what they look like. So a good clean headshot or upper body shot is the best. I would bypass your port based on your avatar. Oct 17 12 02:31 pm Link Michael Broughton wrote: I will say maybe on this one. If I am in a hurry, I would not stop. If I have more time, I would click on it just out of curiosity. Its a little dark and different. Oct 17 12 02:33 pm Link Richard Rix wrote: I would not even stop long enough to look at the avatar. It is way to busy. I find these images irritating, and I immediately move on. Oct 17 12 02:34 pm Link Poulsons Photography wrote: Thank you. No problem, I picked that avatar so only people who find it interesting would enter my port. Oct 17 12 02:41 pm Link Does it? Oct 17 12 02:43 pm Link Sure, why not. Oct 17 12 02:43 pm Link you got me, I'm curious... Oct 17 12 02:53 pm Link I just changed my avatar today, so I'm curious to read what you think. Oct 17 12 02:54 pm Link Bek Ruszin wrote: Clean crisp and close. It shows you do beautiful work. I would stop for sure. Oct 17 12 03:01 pm Link Oct 17 12 03:02 pm Link Oddlittleworld Arts wrote: What I see is a blurry image. And if the avatar is blurry, the rest of the port usually is as well. So I would pass right on by. Oct 17 12 03:03 pm Link Blue Ash Film Group wrote: I like this. When I click on it and bring it up full size, it is an awesome shot. However, it may be a little small on an avatar. You can't see it good without really looking. So this is one I would stop at if I had time, but if I was in a hurry, I would pass by. It would be too bad if I didn't stop, because you have some great work. Oct 17 12 03:05 pm Link How about mine? Oct 17 12 03:08 pm Link Poulsons Photography wrote: Yeah, gum bichromate prints tend to look like that. But my wet plate collodion is sharp as a tack! It was just a little test... Oct 17 12 03:13 pm Link I gotta know... Oct 17 12 03:24 pm Link ok Oct 17 12 03:26 pm Link I'm game Oct 17 12 03:33 pm Link Shoot Oct 17 12 03:36 pm Link Sure! Oct 17 12 03:37 pm Link Probably not Oct 17 12 03:41 pm Link Let me know! Oct 17 12 03:50 pm Link Me please Oct 17 12 03:54 pm Link Poulsons Photography wrote: Thank you! Oct 17 12 04:05 pm Link If you have the time, I'd like an opinion. Oct 17 12 04:06 pm Link |