WillSpringfield wrote:
my sentiment is..  GET NEKKIT... BE HAPPY ::to the tune of "don't worry, be happy"::


and i dont know how many times i have to say actors and actresses are butt naked all the time in movies, on peoples yachts getting pix snapped by the paps. in photos, in public, in brazil and st tropez(my next destination). 

my dick is in photos... somewhere... i'm sure i will be fine. i am a little further along in the game than you as an actor and model... it hasnt bitten me in my ass... and nude women arent as taboo as a commercial male model with his DICK in photos

MMDesign wrote:

I know I sing much better after doing what she was doing.

Engel Schrei wrote:

Rodney took nekkid photos of me ... but I liked it

But nothing with my 600mm zoomed in real tight for...the beauty shots, yeah that's the ticket....alas may be next time

Miss Anna Evans wrote:
In light of the fact that this 18+ photo is in your portfolio, I find this thread to be ironic, to put it lightly.

Yeah but thats not HER tit.  Or is it?

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:

wait-  anybody have a link to this "dick" photo?

my thoughts exactly.....NEED PROOF

Hollywood Starlet wrote:
Even this image...



Can hurt you in the acting world, if you're worried about nudity.

It may help you, who knows. Depends on job.

Did the photog pay you?

Was it TF? If TF you may have say.

Good luck!

God bless.

yeah, see that's my whole point.  this picture isn't too far way from being nude.  and if the op feels that strongly about the whole situation, then a whole new port might be in order....

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:

DarioImpiniPhotography wrote:
Yeah but thats not HER tit.  Or is it?

If it is hers that's pretty impressive

Mickle Design Werks wrote:

But nothing with my 600mm zoomed in real tight for...the beauty shots, yeah that's the ticket....alas may be next time

So THAT'S what a photographer means when he asks for "beauty shots"..


Hmmm..

I'll do it if you make me cookies.

Engel Schrei wrote:
So THAT'S what a photographer means when he asks for "beauty shots"..


Hmmm..

I'll do it if you make me cookies.

I make kick ass Oatmeal Chocolate Chip cookies.

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:

yeah, see that's my whole point.  this picture isn't too far way from being nude.  and if the op feels that strongly about the whole situation, then a whole new port might be in order....

I get the feeling there's more to this story than the lady protesting too much...

MMDesign wrote:

I know I sing much better after doing what she was doing.

I did hear that your yodeling CD was selling well.

Mickle Design Werks wrote:

I make kick ass Oatmeal Chocolate Chip cookies. ;P

I'm so in.

When & where mister

pullins photography wrote:

I get the feeling there's more to this story than the lady protesting too much...

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

c_h_r_i_s wrote:
now we all want to see the op's open legg pic's just to get this forum on track.

Yes, I think she should post them and we can all vote on whether or not they will hurt her career.

New Dawn Photography wrote:

I did hear that your yodeling CD was selling well.

I sent your autographed copy out a few days ago. Thanks for the support!

c_h_r_i_s wrote:
I'm finding the op's posting full of contradictions.

You to.. I just think there is something missing to this story

Man i have a headache

Miss Santos wrote:
I actually understand how this may sound contradictory. I do. What I never asked was how people feel about the images already in my port. That fact that I may be a famous actress or not is very irrelevant at this point. I never asked to be critiqued about the nature of my existing port or if they are TASTEFUL or not. No matter how sexual or whatever you all are judging them as I never want certain parts of my body documented and that's by my own personal discretion and reason. This was taken way too far out of context. The facts are though that I did take these photos and I agreed upon it at the time so now there's nothing to do with it. And I don't think they will come back to haunt me. Its just the fact that I know someone may be able to view one part of my body because its MY personal choice and reason even IF other parts ARE EXPOSED. Its something I WILL discuss nicely with my photographer and that no I can't take back. I can understand others standpoints and confusion but never did I expect or deserve to be attacked.

why did you remove the nipple shot?  just curious.  no smart ass remark or any thing.  i'm just wondering.


edit-  never mind.  i found it.  i thought you had taken it down.

Engel Schrei wrote:
I'll do it if you make me cookies.

My wife makes the world's best ginger snaps.

Just sayin'

MYS Britt wrote:

All through 80's and 90's I was a school teacher
I shot published and exhibited nudes .. and so on the shoots I used to pull ugly faces
to be SURE they'd crop my face out

I actually prefer an absurd face or two in my port

Jessalyn wrote:
You are upset because you are going into acting and don't want those photos to surface later.

I'm curious then, what if these photos surfaced? They include nudity or implied nudity.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … id=4892657

https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … id=6998908

American prudes see it all the same.

I was thinking the same thing....

Miss Santos wrote:
..Is there anything I can do to protect my privacy?

Miss Santos wrote:
I actually understand how this may sound contradictory. I do. What I never asked was how people feel about the images already in my port. That fact that I may be a famous actress or not is very irrelevant at this point. I never asked to be critiqued about the nature of my existing port or if they are TASTEFUL or not. No matter how sexual or whatever you all are judging them as I never want certain parts of my body documented and that's by my own personal discretion and reason. This was taken way too far out of context. The facts are though that I did take these photos and I agreed upon it at the time so now there's nothing to do with it. And I don't think they will come back to haunt me. Its just the fact that I know someone may be able to view one part of my body because its MY personal choice and reason even IF other parts ARE EXPOSED. Its something I WILL discuss nicely with my photographer and that no I can't take back. I can understand others standpoints and confusion but never did I expect or deserve to be attacked.

By posting and asking that question from your first post, you openly invited people to look and question why you now want "privacy" when you've clearly exposed yourself..

Miss Santos wrote:
..Its just the fact that I know someone may be able to view one part of my body because its MY personal choice and reason even IF other parts ARE EXPOSED....

Wait.. did i understand this correctly.. now you don't mind nude but are afaird people might see your hoohoo.??

It is just me or did i read that wrong..

Ouch my head

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:

why did you remove the nipple shot?  just curious.  no smart ass remark or any thing.  i'm just wondering.

I didn't remove it.....?

Miss Santos wrote:

I didn't remove it.....?

yeah, i edited my post.  i found it.

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:

Miss Santos wrote:
No matter how sexual or whatever you all are judging them as I never want certain parts of my body documented and that's by my own personal discretion and reason.

Then you should not have taken the pictures to begin with.  Duh!