Photographer
Boho Hobo
Posts: 25351
Santa Barbara, California, US
Daniela V wrote:
Meanwhile, there isn't a nude picture in his entire MM portfolio.
Makes one wonder if he has a private collection.... Shiva Photo wrote:
No in fact My models are more clothed than one can imagine.
Intend to start a private collection. Of course Daniela would be my first pick. Guaranteed to have a fire extinguisher, first aid kit, duct tape, industrial grade stapler, Glue gun and a chastity belt. And this characterization is different from what GWC would say or think...how?
Photographer
Stephen Bodi
Posts: 848
East Northport, New York, US
Novus Ordo wrote:
LMAO!! This guy just THREATENED ME!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
![https://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q246/rhoceez/Untitled-1.jpg]()
AHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Wow... Internet bravery at its finest.
Photographer
Shiva Photo
Posts: 1961
East Hills, New York, US
McKenzie Bros Photo wrote:
If its such a 'stoooopid topic', why are you so concerned with it---to the point of dominating the post with in the forum? Its like the argument, just change the channel. Oh wait, we(society) are addicted to the things we hate. Well said,
Daniela has made more contributions to the topic and breathed more life into this thread and got herself all entangled in the thread and does not want to extricate herself . Need help for this knotty or naughty problem , just ask.
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
There are beautiful models and sexy models.
Pretty women with that vacant stare BORES the shit out of me and it shows on the photos.
There are models that exude sex appeal, that excitement gets added to the work, it shows on the finished product.
A model can make you feel that sex appeal, draw you into the mood. Yes, it affects you, Sexy women get men excited, even experienced photographers. It does not stop you working, it gets the mood of the photography set.
So drop the PURITAN shit, that we are not supposed to react to a PRIMAL instinct.
btw..the only model I have compalin about a photographer was about a female photographer looking for a slurp.
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
Nicholaus wrote:
fuck you Grow up...you are entirely UNPROFESSIONAL, immature, and effing STUPID.
Photographer
Le Beck Photography
Posts: 4114
Los Angeles, California, US
Unless you've been emasculated or are from the planet Vulcan, or Both.
On the other hand. Like many of the posters here, I'm just too busy working.
Photographer
Andreas Yiasimi
Posts: 895
Norwich, England, United Kingdom
Ed Selby wrote:
Oh yeah, one more thing re: the chef and his food thing.
"Never trust a skinny chef." Hey Ed! My Fathers a chef man so this made me laugh (He's not skinny for sure)
Ah! but would one trust a chef if he openly salivated over his kitchen work top? lol
Photographer
Craig A McKenzie
Posts: 1767
Marine City, Michigan, US
Ed Selby wrote:
...but would one trust a chef if he openly salivated over his kitchen work top? lol Probably-because its about being passionate about his/her work...unlike the cooks at the fast food restaurant that spit in the food. That little analogy is comparable to Photographer and GWC.
Photographer
yani
Posts: 1041
Matawan, New Jersey, US
Shiva Photo wrote:
We all know about the GWC and his cheap thrills. What about the legitimate phoyographers. Can all of them honestly say that they had or had not at least a tinge of arousal at a nude shoot Have the Models sensed that and how did they deal with the situation. After all Playboy has been around for decades only because of nude photos of beautiful women In case you missed it.
Not GWC and his cheap thrills.
Legit togs - "tingle of arousal"
NO RAGING HARDONS!!!!
Was it sensed? Possible change of breathing pattern not RAGING HARDON
How was it handled? Did she push it? did she back off? did she run screaming out the door?
6 pages of BULLSHIT over a legit question.
TRAINWRECK!!
Shut this thread!
Photographer
Andreas Yiasimi
Posts: 895
Norwich, England, United Kingdom
McKenzie Bros Photo wrote:
Probably-because its about being passionate about his/her work...unlike the cooks at the fast food restaurant that spit in the food. That little analogy is comparable to Photographer and GWC. Ah! I see where you are coming from, great answer that! Puts things into perspective 
Model
MarlenaLove
Posts: 161
Spring Lake, Florida, US
Hello everyone. Upon re-reading what I wrote and catching up with the progress of this thread, I have come to the conclusion that I may have portrayed myself in a negative manner. I do not wish to revoke my personal opinion on this subject, (that being that arousal during a photo shoot is human nature and must be understood as that, but handled in a professional manner) rather, I would like to fill in some blanks that I left in my earlier testimony.
I have thought about this more and I recalled my first instincts and feelings apon being told that said photog was turned on. It definetly made me more cautious of him. It wasn't until I spoke to him further, that I began to feel that he was not a threat to me. Do I think it is wrong to tell a model or that you were turned on by them during a photo shoot? Absolutely. It is not professional in my opinion.
I would also like to make it clear that I have never told a photographer that I was turned on during a photoshoot. When I use the words "turned on" in this context, I am also not refering to physical arousal. It was the said "twinge".
Furthermore, I would like to appologize for using the word "prude" in relation to the people that do not have the same opinions as I do. I feel that threads lack certain mannerisms that can only be experienced in face to face conversation. I am seriously re-considering ever sharing any of my imput in a thread on MM again. Everything is nit-picked and exagerated to the point of making me feel like I am watching a horrible daytime soap opera.
Photographer
ATMPhotos
Posts: 1565
Brooklyn, New York, US
Fotogene wrote:
After 45 years of shooting partially to totally nude females I can say for the most part no during the shoot. My concentration is on all of the aspects of getting the shot. I did have a model ten years ago who was a dancer run over to where I was standing and suddenly check to see if I was aroused with her hand. It so startled me that I almost ended the shoot..... 
So, you mean to tell us that a model literally grabbed your...manhood...in order to determine if you were aroused sexually!?! During the shoot, no less! Amazing....I'd have to have a very serious discussion with a model bold enough to do that to me after the photoshoot...
Something tells me that if you did have a hardon during a photoshoot, that you'd simply continue working towards getting the shot [no pun intended].
Make sure you have baggy pants on for your photoshoots with female models, my fellow male photographers...
For the models that have, or may post in this thread:
What would you do if you were, on your own, without any attempt on his part to make this known to you, to discover or notice that the male photographer has gotten a hardon while shooting you? I ask this in the context of him continuing to conduct and conclude the photoshoot in a professional manner.
Photographer
Eli Anthony
Posts: 550
Mentor, Ohio, US
Frog516 wrote:
Anybody ever knock over a lightstand with a big raging woody and set your studio on fire? LMFAO!!!!!
Photographer
Robert Randall
Posts: 13890
Chicago, Illinois, US
sdsteve wrote:
man...that was hard to read....after getting through all the mistakes, i get the subject and oh yeah...i walk around with wood at all my nude shoots.....i just duct tape it to my belly I'm right there with you Steve, I tape it to my ankle.
Model
Chaya Phally
Posts: 7738
New York, New York, US
Have you been aroused by Nude Models e-string wrote:
Yes. Me too.
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Okay, I just got off the phone with my attorney, and he advises me that I do not recall if I've ever been aroused during a shoot.
Photographer
Gone Til Novus-ember
Posts: 11440
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote:
I'm right there with you Steve, I tape it to my ankle. Orange pop all over the laptop. You owe me a new lifebook dammit.
Photographer
Papa Vic Photography
Posts: 8211
Glendale, Arizona, US
sdsteve wrote:
man...that was hard to read....after getting through all the mistakes, i get the subject and oh yeah...i walk around with wood at all my nude shoots.....i just duct tape it to my belly Bob Randall Photography wrote:
I'm right there with you Steve, I tape it to my ankle. I am gratified and relieved to learn that you only tape it to your own ankle.
Photographer
Off Center Media
Posts: 94
Naperville, Illinois, US
Ray Savage wrote:
I'm WAY too busy trying to remember how to take half way decent pictures. I second that....in the middle of a shoot, I'm too busy looking at tiny details.
Photographer
Al Abbazia
Posts: 3212
Orlando, Florida, US
Once again, an immature, moronic topic.
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
Off Center Media wrote:
I second that....in the middle of a shoot, I'm too busy looking at tiny details. so you have a tiny peepee ...too much info, way too much.
Photographer
Ed the Healer
Posts: 2384
Addison, Alabama, US
LOL...let's turn this around a bit.
Have you ever come across a model who, when she got naked, was so totally bad looking that your winky went into seclusion for weeks? You know...maybe if she looked like a preying mantis with cortisone bloat?
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
Organic Photos by Ed wrote:
LOL...let's turn this around a bit.
Have you ever come across a model who, when she got naked, was so totally bad looking that your winky went into seclusion for weeks? You know...maybe if she looked like a preying mantis with cortisone bloat? you must stop paying for those "escorts"
Photographer
Ed the Healer
Posts: 2384
Addison, Alabama, US
UnoMundo wrote:
you must stop paying for those "escorts" ok
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
Organic Photos by Ed wrote:
LOL...let's turn this around a bit.
Have you ever come across a model who, when she got naked, was so totally bad looking that your winky went into seclusion for weeks? You know...maybe if she looked like a preying mantis with cortisone bloat? The most non-sexy women are the overly busty models with the vacant stare for a pose.
That will NOT get me a woody with the help of 4 Jack Daniels.
Model
AngelEyes Kari
Posts: 2093
Milaca, Minnesota, US
Aroused by nudity? What will people think of next?!?!
Photographer
Nihilus
Posts: 10888
Nashville, Tennessee, US
What a mess.
Some people are so afraid of what they are...
Photographer
The Divine Emily Fine
Posts: 20454
Owings Mills, Maryland, US
AngelEyes Cornell wrote:
Aroused by nudity? What will people think of next?!?! Pr0nz on teh intarwebs?! NO WAI!!!
Model
AngelEyes Kari
Posts: 2093
Milaca, Minnesota, US
Emily Fine wrote:
Pr0nz on teh intarwebs?! NO WAI!!! I never look at that stuff. *cough*
Photographer
Nihilus
Posts: 10888
Nashville, Tennessee, US
Novus Ordo wrote:
LMAO!! This guy just THREATENED ME!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
![https://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q246/rhoceez/Untitled-1.jpg]()
AHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! This image has been quoted a couple of times.
Why isn't the offender on an extended time-out? Heck...ban him altogether. He's admitted to not having any other reason for being here other than to act as a sluggo.
Photographer
Ed the Healer
Posts: 2384
Addison, Alabama, US
UnoMundo wrote:
The most non-sexy women are the overly busty models with the vacant stare for a pose.
That will NOT get me a woody with the help of 4 Jack Daniels. Too late for excuses, your reputation for impaired performance has preceded you.
Photographer
J Welborn
Posts: 2552
Clarksville, Tennessee, US
Give this idea a rest ----
Professional photographers act professional and never mention petty little thoughts like this.
Photographer
The Divine Emily Fine
Posts: 20454
Owings Mills, Maryland, US
J Welborn wrote:
Give this idea a rest ----
Professional photographers act professional and never mention petty little thoughts like this. But...but it's FUN!
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Okay, here's what we'll do. Any model planning on being in the Seattle area at all this year, drop me a line. We'll shoot nudes out at the mill for my book ( http://journalpix.com/MillCasting.jpg), and see if you can turn me on. I dare you. (damn, I'm shameless!. Think anyone will go for it? :-))
Model
MelissaLynnette LaDiva
Posts: 50816
Leawood, Kansas, US
Christopher Ambler wrote:
Okay, here's what we'll do.
Any model planning on being in the Seattle area at all this year, drop me a line. We'll shoot nudes out at the mill for my book (http://journalpix.com/MillCasting.jpg), and see if you can turn me on. I dare you.
(damn, I'm shameless!. Think anyone will go for it? :-)) Me! Now to figure out how to get to Seattle.
Model
Big A-Larger Than Life
Posts: 33451
The Woodlands, Texas, US
Every homosexual MAN(yes, man) in the country would probably disagree... Gunfitr wrote:
I used to shoot with a particular girl who would go to tugging on the clasp of her jeans, and unbuttoning her shirt, and pushing up a little cleavage, all the while making the most intense eye contact you would ever beleive and she looked like she was whispering really really naughty things to herself.
Don't know a guy that has shot her that didn't completely understand what she was up to. If as a guy that didn't give you a bit of wood, then you don't deserve to call yourself a man.
Mark
Photographer
Fashionshooter
Posts: 26
New York, New York, US
I prefer that my nude models not arouse me, touching a photographer is always a bad idea.
Photographer
Ryan Colford Studios
Posts: 2286
Brooklyn, New York, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote:
I'm right there with you Steve, I tape it to my ankle. I leave mine home - where it's safe and protected.
Photographer
Craig Seay
Posts: 8606
Nashville, Tennessee, US
Some mod action needed here (see threats).
Let it rest people.
|
