Photographer
Michael Bell
Posts: 925
Anaheim, California, US
Daniela V wrote:
Dude, I was offering up discussion in Christopher's thread. He even said so. Making multiple, negative posts about how photographers only want to work with models who need all the airbrushing isnt offering up discussion. Its bashing models that were listed in there and making you seem bitter you were on none of the lists.
Photographer
Beatbox Jeebus v2
Posts: 10046
Palatine, Illinois, US
Daniela V wrote:
Dude, I was offering up discussion in Christopher's thread. He even said so.
And I'm confident enough in my work not to worry about which lists I am and am not on. Thanks for your concern though. FYI You are on my awesome and do not fuck with list...
Model
Amber Morrow
Posts: 22
New York, New York, US
Hahaha this is great 
Model
Dances with Wolves
Posts: 25108
SHAWNEE ON DELAWARE, Pennsylvania, US
Michael Bell wrote:
Making multiple, negative posts about how photographers only want to work with models who need all the airbrushing isnt offering up discussion. Its bashing models that were listed in there and making you seem bitter you were on none of the lists. What multiple posts?
I opened up a thread weeks ago discussing photoshop in glamour photography. It actually was a damn good discussion. There was bashing going on, but not by me. There was even outing going on, but again, not by me.
If I look bitter to you, I don't really care. I have nothing to be bitter about. I do just fine as a model, thanks (again) for your concern.
Model
Jordan K
Posts: 5523
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
it's these new female web models. if you really want someone to flake like they should, you need a web male model. they always have something just coming up. and as for nudes, no way in hell. As well, the charge exuberant rates. thats what you need.
Photographer
K -- O
Posts: 1635
Boonsboro, Maryland, US
Daniela V wrote:
What multiple posts?
I opened up a thread weeks ago discussing photoshop in glamour photography. It actually was a damn good discussion. There was bashing going on, but not by me. There was even outing going on, but again, not by me.
If I look bitter to you, I don't really care. I have nothing to be bitter about. I do just fine as a model, thanks (again) for your concern. With a punch to the gut
Photographer
Al Perry
Posts: 475
Roy, Utah, US
Great thread. Thanks for a smile. Models are great. My pictures would be nothing without them.
Model
Dances with Wolves
Posts: 25108
SHAWNEE ON DELAWARE, Pennsylvania, US
K -- O wrote:
With a punch to the gut I heart you.
Photographer
Michael Bell
Posts: 925
Anaheim, California, US
Daniela V wrote:
What multiple posts? The FIVE posts you made in that thread bashing models in there saying that they "required" all the photoshop. Dont make me post em in here.
Photographer
R. Cervelli
Posts: 1355
Boston, Massachusetts, US
I think we should all chip in and help schedule a shoot with Daniela and Michael. I would love to SEE those images
Photographer
K -- O
Posts: 1635
Boonsboro, Maryland, US
Michael Bell wrote:
The FIVE posts you made in that thread bashing models in there saying that they "required" all the photoshop. Dont make me post em in here. That would be threadjacking.
Photographer
WIP
Posts: 15973
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
Just put down the camera and just sit there.
Then the model might pay attention.
I've given up being nice I try to work to a standard anything below I will walk away from.
I know of 2 very well know photographers who have either refused to shoot a model or asked them to leave.
Photographer
BTHPhoto
Posts: 6985
Fairbanks, Alaska, US
Michael Bell wrote:
The FIVE posts you made in that thread bashing models in there saying that they "required" all the photoshop. Dont make me post em in here. I call hijack. This thread is about humor and fun and acknowledging all the reliable, responsible models out there busting their asses to do a good job. Take the who bashed who tit for tat elsewhere. Thanks.
Photographer
Michael Bell
Posts: 925
Anaheim, California, US
Photographer
BTHPhoto
Posts: 6985
Fairbanks, Alaska, US
Michael Bell wrote:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Are you trying to make me get myself brigged? 
Photographer
K -- O
Posts: 1635
Boonsboro, Maryland, US
Photographer
R. Cervelli
Posts: 1355
Boston, Massachusetts, US
like driving home buzzed and you look in the rearview mirror and see flashing lights?
Model
Dances with Wolves
Posts: 25108
SHAWNEE ON DELAWARE, Pennsylvania, US
Tim Hammond wrote:
Are you trying to make me get myself brigged? Tim-
He's bringing a conversation that I had with Ward and Steven Eastwood about what makes a photographer want to work with certain models into your thread.
I like what you were trying to do here. Nice thread. I get equally annoyed when I speak to a photographer and they have all these brand new ideas and are excited and ready to shoot when I get there. People like Stacy Leigh, Will Springfield, John Cooper, Yani...ugh...so annoying how they are always psyched to shoot and make you want to take pictures for hours on end. Damn those people.
edit: out of respect for you (and for the OP of the other thread he already hijacked) I will not be responding to Michael in hopes that he will just get bored and go somewhere else...and that your thread can continue with the good stuff it started.
Photographer
Squire Photography
Posts: 157
London, England, United Kingdom
so where did you bury her remains?
Photographer
K -- O
Posts: 1635
Boonsboro, Maryland, US
Bob Cervelli wrote:
like driving home buzzed and you look in the rearview mirror and see flashing lights? Hate that.
Photographer
BTHPhoto
Posts: 6985
Fairbanks, Alaska, US
Bob Cervelli wrote:
like driving home buzzed and you look in the rearview mirror and see flashing lights? No, more like driving home buzzed and you look in the rearview mirror and see Carrie Nation with her bible and hatchet.
Model
_Blip_
Posts: 6703
Tampa, Florida, US
 So much for a positive thread about models in the forums. I knew it couldn't last for long. Nice try though guys! 
Photographer
Richard Horn
Posts: 499
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Christ... great thread gets whacked again by one jerk....
Photographer
Michael Bell
Posts: 925
Anaheim, California, US
Negative Altitude wrote:
Christ... great thread gets whacked again by one jerk.... I know, shes evil
Photographer
R. Cervelli
Posts: 1355
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Tim, I was going to hijack and start a new thread of "Models that irritate you" and then post up the reliable models and why they "POSITIVELY" irritate you with stuff like "I hate this one cause she shows up 1/2 hour early and steamcleans her clothing" or "This one paid for her own flight and brought her own make-up artist" the reverse of outting call it "inning" your deal though.. won't steal it from you
Photographer
BTHPhoto
Posts: 6985
Fairbanks, Alaska, US
Bob Cervelli wrote:
Tim, I was going to hijack and start a new thread of "Models that irritate you" and then post up the reliable models and why they "POSITIVELY" irritate you with stuff like
"I hate this one cause she shows up 1/2 hour early and steamcleans her clothing"
or
"This one paid for her own flight and brought her own make-up artist"
the reverse of outting call it "inning"
your deal though.. won't steal it from you Careful, if we have two positive threads about models going at the same time, the earth might shatter. Go for it!
Photographer
R. Cervelli
Posts: 1355
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Actually was going to, but then again.. SOMEONE will read it wrong and could turn into a brigfest.
Model
Isobel Wren
Posts: 1536
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
LOL, I like this take on it better than any other thread with a similar title ever.
Photographer
Richard Horn
Posts: 499
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Michael Bell wrote:
I know, shes evil and so full of himself too...
That's it, your 15 minutes are up. I will go back to ignoring you.
Photographer
Sector 6
Posts: 1615
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Web Models...Don't reply to a casting post if you are not really interested. Stop wasting the time of people who work for a living.
Photographer
Visual Into-xXx-ication
Posts: 83
Senecaville, Ohio, US
Tim Hammond wrote:
I don't get it. I was contacted by a wannabe model on myspace. Crazy girl wanted to shoot nude and didn't want money. (I know, that should have been my first warning, but I tend to trust people, what can I say?) Anyway, we e-mailed several times, made arrangements. Wouldn't you know it - SHE SHOWED UP! And on TIME even! What the hell?! I don't know where she gets off acting like that! Then, to top it off, she ticked off every pose I asked for, just like clockwork.
Now I probably shouldn't admit it, but this has happened to me several times, not only with myspace, but with MM models too. I know, you're probably all asking how many times it takes me to learn my lesson. I guess I'm just a sucker. How can I avoid this in the future?
Someone really needs to tell these freaking web models to quit acting like responsible professionals! Models, take some advice: if you wannabe a web model, you better flake like you mean it. Otherwise no one will ever take you seriously! When I go to the web for a model, I expect a flake, and I'm getting really sick of being disappointed. HOW DARE SHE! SOME PEOPLES CHILDREN SICKEN ME! lmfao this is great
Model
Dances with Wolves
Posts: 25108
SHAWNEE ON DELAWARE, Pennsylvania, US
Sector 6 wrote:
Web Models...Don't reply to a casting post if you are not really interested. Stop wasting the time of people who work for a living. Way to continue to keep this negative....
*sigh*
Photographer
BTHPhoto
Posts: 6985
Fairbanks, Alaska, US
Sector 6 wrote:
Web Models...Don't reply to a casting post if you are not really interested. Stop wasting the time of people who work for a living. WHOOOSH!
Photographer
Ed Stringbourne
Posts: 16319
Kansas City, Missouri, US
NYBlondes wrote:
She shot nude and for free??? How did you manage that??? I had a net model pay me to shoot her nude today. She loved the pix too, bless her!
Photographer
Sector 6
Posts: 1615
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Daniela V wrote:
Way to continue to keep this negative....
*sigh* That was the point, was it not?
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
DannyBourne wrote:
I had a net model pay me to shoot her nude today. She loved the pix too, bless her! Danny, I hope you charge more to shoot with no clothes on.
Photographer
R. Cervelli
Posts: 1355
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Sector 6 wrote:
Web Models...Don't reply to a casting post if you are not really interested. Stop wasting the time of people who work for a living. Tim Hammond wrote:
WHOOOSH! hahahah I rest my case
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
OP, I know how you feel. I have had every model I arranged to shoot from here turn up. make up artists and studio hires too. It makes me sick.
Photographer
R. Cervelli
Posts: 1355
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Sector 6 wrote:
That was the point, was it not? Read the OP.... it was a positive not a negative..
Photographer
Ed Stringbourne
Posts: 16319
Kansas City, Missouri, US
gdsandy wrote:
Danny, I hope you charge more to shoot with no clothes on. I thought I'd got it wrong! Is it the model that's supposed to be nude?
|
