Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote:
Cam on a timer? That bad ass dude is you? I thought you were white. Seriously??
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Wow, they "kinda" fixed the 41 bug.
Photographer
La Seine by the Hudson
Posts: 8587
New York, New York, US
Christopher Bush wrote:
are you saying i'm apparently-paradoxical-but-not-really? Fuck, you're talking like me now! Argh!
Photographer
Kelvin Hammond
Posts: 17397
Billings, Montana, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote: Cam on a timer? That bad ass dude is you? I thought you were white.
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: Seriously?? *giggles* That's cuz he normally uses a high pass filter on himself. Works like camo.
Photographer
kode b
Posts: 120
San Diego, California, US
A light bulb lit in my brain when you stated the fact you used a bare bulb to get the strong highlights and shadows - something I've been struggling with using modifiers...lol. Thanks for the epiphany moment! Luckily for you Ransom, the process you use can be known to everyone, but the eye you have for composition is very hard to replicate so you should remain envied for quite some time.
Photographer
Robert Randall
Posts: 13890
Chicago, Illinois, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote:
Seriously?? Nah, but it made you laugh!
Photographer
Gone Til Novus-ember
Posts: 11440
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote:
Nah, but it made you laugh! LOL ass!
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12164
Austin, Texas, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote:
Nah, but it made you laugh! Black I figured but you're supposed to be some old fart like me. Too damn young to be that good.
Photographer
S
Posts: 21678
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
And now, to all the haters who have called me a liar when I've said that Ransom's pictures aren't that heavily photoshopped, I say: I TOLD YOU SO! That is all.
Photographer
Gone Til Novus-ember
Posts: 11440
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Sita Mae Edwards wrote: And now, to all the haters who have called me a liar when I've said that Ransom's pictures aren't that heavily photoshopped, I say: I TOLD YOU SO! That is all. No no, let them believe that it's all photoshop. Just proves to me that they must not be that good if they can't fathom how I get my photos to look that way without a shit load of PS work.
Photographer
HungryEye
Posts: 2281
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
A well written and magnanimous tutorial. Good of you to share some of the magic, and to offer the lesson that it doesn't have to be about post production. Be prepared for a spate of "Mock Cheeses" whipping the modifiers off their monolights.
Photographer
Brooks Ayola
Posts: 9754
Chatsworth, California, US
Jerry Bennett wrote: Dude, you must be mistaken. That can't be how you do it 'cause all the experts here on MM say that White Lightnings and Alien Bees suck! I guess it depends on if you plan on using the same units twenty years from now after dragging them on location, like I've been using my Speedotrons. :-) I wasn't aware that people thought you used a lot of Photoshop in your pictures Ransom. They don't seem that PS'd to me. It looks like the stuff I used to shoot 15 years ago on Agfa Ultra 50 print film like this: 18+ http://ayola.com/aweb/girlrocks.jpg I think it's your subject matter that's the original part of your work.
Photographer
Legacys 7
Posts: 33899
San Francisco, California, US
Brooks Ayola wrote:
I guess it depends on if you plan on using the same units twenty years from now after dragging them on location, like I've been using my Speedotrons. :-) I wasn't aware that people thought you used a lot of Photoshop in your pictures Ransom. They don't seem that PS'd to me. It looks like the stuff I used to shoot 15 years ago on Agfa Ultra 50 print film like this: 18+ http://ayola.com/aweb/girlrocks.jpg I think it's your subject matter that's the original part of your work. Fine as lady there, Brooks.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Brooks Ayola wrote:
I guess it depends on if you plan on using the same units twenty years from now after dragging them on location, like I've been using my Speedotrons. :-) I wasn't aware that people thought you used a lot of Photoshop in your pictures Ransom. They don't seem that PS'd to me. It looks like the stuff I used to shoot 15 years ago on Agfa Ultra 50 print film like this: 18+ http://ayola.com/aweb/girlrocks.jpg I think it's your subject matter that's the original part of your work. That's a kick ass pic sir.
Photographer
Daguerre
Posts: 4082
Orange, California, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: Ok so in regards to my "The "How Do You Do It?" guys... thread, i was given the idea to make this thread. I'm going to go through my typical process for getting the look that i have on my pics. I figure that when people hit me up to ask, I can just refer them to this thread, plus if anybody else has a picture or look that they consistently get questions about, they can also post a short tutorial in here to show how they did it. First off, i like bright saturated colors and high contrasts in my pictures. (obviously). Spectral highlights and hard shadows are also something that i like the look of. So my style is tailored to that. For my outdoor pictures (which is what i will be explaining in this thread) i tend to shoot bare bulb strobe with no modifiers, due to the fact that it will give me the harsh shadows, kick up spectral highlights and give me the high contrasts that i like. As far as equipment goes, I shoot with two or three white lightning WL-10000's because i like the durability, the color temp and the simplicity of them. Most shots in my port were shot with the Sony DSC-R1 digital camera, so that let's you know what camera I use. The type of pictures that i take are only going to be as good as the model, the MUA, and the backdrop that you choose. For this one I choose my favorite model, Victoria #133499, one of the MUA's that i use from time to time that i have such a lovely relationship with, and picked a location in the mountains on the way to Lake Mead here in Vegas. It's a great little desert mountain location where some environmentally conscious people did me the favor of dumping all kinds of great shit to use as background fodder. let's take the out of camera RAW image: This was taken as f/11, 1/200, at a focal length of 14mm with the contrast set at +1 and the color setting on Vivid. The first bare bulb WL-5000 was about 10 feet to the to the models left at about her 2 o'clock position. the sun was my fill to the models right at the her 10 o'clock and a had another bare bulb WL-10000 about 10 feet behind the model and boat as a rim light. Both strobes were set to 2/3 power and are rated at 250 watts. The first thing I do is open the file in PS CS3 and do any skin corrections (evening, smoothing out, dodging and burning) then i duplicate the layer and go to Image>Adjustments>Selective Color I normally will bump the blues in the sky to whatever look I want (I like a rich blue or purple sky myself) by adjusting the sliders in the Selective Color tool. Then I create a layer mask and hide all so i can paint in my sky and bump up the reds in the boat without effecting the rest of the picture (which is where i want it to be) After painting in the sky and boat, I'm pretty much done so i save the PSD file and then save a jpeg here's the side by side. Alright. That's how i do it. It's the best i can do as far as explaining it without actually having you there to watch me work. hopefully this helps some people, and other photographers add in some tips and tricks of their own. Awesome stuff, Cheese!
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Brooks Ayola wrote:
I guess it depends on if you plan on using the same units twenty years from now after dragging them on location, like I've been using my Speedotrons. :-) Also, my WL's are older than some of the models I shoot.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Daguerre wrote:
Awesome stuff, Cheese! You flatter me sir.
Photographer
Daguerre
Posts: 4082
Orange, California, US
Daguerre wrote: Awesome stuff, Cheese! Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: You flatter me sir. I do not-- your galleries are regularly scheduled stops of mine. Like most I admire, your setup is simple, but deadly accurate. And that is as good as it gets!
Photographer
timeless image
Posts: 428
Houston, Texas, US
Thanks for sharing, your work kicks butt.
Photographer
Mark Brummitt
Posts: 40527
Clarkston, Michigan, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: Alright. That's how i do it. It's the best i can do as far as explaining it without actually having you there to watch me work. hopefully this helps some people, and other photographers add in some tips and tricks of their own. Thanks. I'll be taking some of those pointers and adding a few of my own.
Photographer
Kincaid Blackwood
Posts: 23492
Los Angeles, California, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote: Cam on a timer? That bad ass dude is you? I thought you were white. Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: Seriously?? Bob Randall Photography wrote: Nah, but it made you laugh! Lawl!!
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
ixxxix wrote:
Lawl!! Hate!!
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Daguerre wrote:
Daguerre wrote: Awesome stuff, Cheese! I do not-- your galleries are regularly scheduled stops of mine. Like most I admire, your setup is simple, but deadly accurate. And that is as good as it gets! Well thank you sir. You already know you've been int he favorites list for a loooooooong time.
Photographer
Kincaid Blackwood
Posts: 23492
Los Angeles, California, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: Hate!! P'leez... I hear that shit said about me so often that it's refreshing to hear it directed at someone else. Even if only in jest. The Cheese's Lighting Tutorial for Dummies is plenty helpful though. No hate there at all...
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Now THIS pic had a lot more PS work involved than most anything else in my profile (aside from the rainy day London pic) and it's still pretty close to what came out of the camera. Just a lot of dodging and burning and a little cloning of the fire.
Photographer
Kelvin Hammond
Posts: 17397
Billings, Montana, US
Fire is tough! Yikes, but good job! I have to admit that I thought for sure you had a gold umbrella on your mainlight or were bouncing your flash off a gold/silver reflector. Your mods skin tones seem fairly warm. Then again, hyping up contrast and tone during shooting could do that too, along with a slight color balance adjust in the RAW dialog. Usually I'm too freaked out about holding my highlights to up the contrast in camera, and do it slowly with layers in PS instead.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Marko Cecic-Karuzic wrote: BTW, kudos Ransom. You need say nothing further when people ask, if you ask me. Apparently this is NOT the case Marko.
Photographer
Active Lifestyle Photo
Posts: 756
Laguna Niguel, California, US
thanks for sharing. very cool read.
Photographer
Richard Tallent
Posts: 7136
Beaumont, Texas, US
Thanks for doing this, Ransom! Two tips: 1. You can make your cloning/healing non-destructive by doing it on an empty layer right above your background layer and setting the Clone or Heal Sample mode to Current/Below. Sometimes I'll have 3-6 layers of various clone/heal adjustments, and I can even "dial them back" individually with the layer transparency. 2. To do something *similar* to the Selective Color in CS3 (might be close enough), add a B&W Adjustment Layer, make your slider adjustments there, and then set the mode of the layer to Luminosity. Added advantage again: it's non-destructive.
Photographer
Fotticelli
Posts: 12252
Rockville, Maryland, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote:
These were my first strobes! They were very lightweight and worked great! There is no way to put a softbox on them but that was just fine with me since I couldn't afford one. I used a plastic see-through shower curtain stretched on a frame made out of PVC pipes. Good times!
Photographer
Jim Ewing
Posts: 4577
Riverside, California, US
I have to ask...how did you power the strobes? I have 2 Photogenics 320Bs (rating of 320 w/Secs, battery pack operational), but can't seem to over-power the sun. I wanted to take out my 2 Solair 500's or the 1000 to really underexpose the noon sun.
Photographer
BYS
Posts: 11614
Paris, Île-de-France, France
it's great to see a good photographer sharing well ,no surprise Cheese is The Cheese thanks bro to make that forum more decent tb
Photographer
JLC Images
Posts: 11615
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, US
Awesome work and cudos for sharing. Says much about your character.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Jim Ewing wrote: I have to ask...how did you power the strobes? I have 2 Photogenics 320Bs (rating of 320 w/Secs, battery pack operational), but can't seem to over-power the sun. I wanted to take out my 2 Solair 500's or the 1000 to really underexpose the noon sun. I can normally get off a full 4 gig card (200 shots) off of one full charge. I wouldn't suggest the average person use one of these, as i have a master electrician for a father should anything go wrong with my strobes. But with two of my coffee cans on full power with no diffusers i can overpower noon sun. At f16 it'll look like dusk/evening.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Fotticelli wrote:
These were my first strobes! They were very lightweight and worked great! There is no way to put a softbox on them but that was just fine with me since I couldn't afford one. I used a plastic see-through shower curtain stretched on a frame made out of PVC pipes. Good times! The WLPA is the speedring adaptor offered for our retired line of White Lightning 5,000 and 10,000 Series Flash Units. The WLPA may be used to attach our softboxes (SB2436, SB3240, and SB3060) to the faceplate of your WL 5,000 and/or WL 10,000 Series flash unit(s). The attached silver pole (included) fits through the WL Series built-in umbrella hole, tightening into place, while the poles from the softbox fit into the four holes found on each side of the adaptor. The WLPA may additionally be used with the Photoflex Litedome and Multidome softboxes, but it may not be used with the Halfdome of Stripdome softboxes. Furthermore, as the WLPA only has four holes for fitting the poles of a softbox, it may not be used with our octaboxes (OB35 and OB47) or with any other manufacturerâs octaboxes.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
BYS wrote: it's great to see a good photographer sharing well ,no surprise Cheese is The Cheese thanks bro to make that forum more decent tb I do what i can Thierry!
Photographer
Low Tek Photography
Posts: 597
Atlanta, Georgia, US
You weren't kidding when you said that a lot of people would be surprised by how little PS you do to your images. =]
Model
Carole B
Posts: 388
Durham, North Carolina, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote: Now THIS pic had a lot more PS work involved than most anything else in my profile (aside from the rainy day London pic) and it's still pretty close to what came out of the camera. Just a lot of dodging and burning and a little cloning of the fire.
your work is amazing...I do wish you spread out the cloning of the fire though because I picked up the doubles right away... Even with that said, your work is so flawless in the WAY its done. Kudos to you....lovely work.
Photographer
DaG
Posts: 2784
Atlanta, Georgia, US
Ransom-The Cheese-J wrote:
I can normally get off a full 4 gig card (200 shots) off of one full charge. I wouldn't suggest the average person use one of these, as i have a master electrician for a father should anything go wrong with my strobes. But with two of my coffee cans on full power with no diffusers i can overpower noon sun. At f16 it'll look like dusk/evening. Don't these things beep incessantly when they are on but not plugged into a wall? Have you just gotten used to the noise or have you modified it in some way? BTW, thanks for sharing your technique. I admire your work greatly. Danny
Photographer
Ralph Corrigan
Posts: 226
Boca Raton, Florida, US
Thanks for sharing, Cheese. And one thing that hasn't been mentioned yet - do y'all see what you can do with relatively middle of the road equipment? This should be a glaring lesson for all aspiring artists in "its not the equipment, its how the photographer uses it".
|