Forums > Photography Talk > Never Again... group shoots... BLAH!!!

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

bencook2 wrote:
Gary, when are you opening up your East Coast location?

That or offer a class that instructs on how to put together a good event!

And for gosh sakes teach some more folks in Houston how to do it.

Jun 23 09 03:21 pm Link

Photographer

glamour pics

Posts: 6095

Los Angeles, California, US

Some of my samples on my profile were done at group shoots.

I much prefer 1-1, though, especially studio shoots, where I can control things and am responsible for the success or failure of shots.

The AVI was a studio session. What a fabulous presence she is!

Jun 23 09 03:24 pm Link

Photographer

BRISBANEbikini

Posts: 341

Last group shoot i attended got busted by the LVPD, so no luck here.

Jun 23 09 03:27 pm Link

Photographer

Christopher Hartman

Posts: 54196

Buena Park, California, US

bencook2 wrote:
Luckily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  The two main models I want to work with have already assured me that they will be attending despite the summary cancellation.

___

How can they attend an event that was cancelled?  And why would they be concerned that YOU cancelled on them if the event was cancelled and you didn't show up.

I myself would feel kind of foolish showing up to a cancelled event.

Jun 23 09 03:28 pm Link

Photographer

pullins photography

Posts: 5884

Troy, Michigan, US

bencook2 wrote:
I have read the horror stories of shoots being a mixture of a photographic gang-bang and an exercise in herding cats.  But, like everything else in my life I had to experience it first.  Oh, wait.  The shoot was canceled.

For two weeks I have kept a neat schedule of models attend the shoot that will be working with me.  I planned to keep to myself, not attending the "gang-bang" portions where photographers crowd around models.  Then today the shoot's organizer calls it off for some cryptic reason.

Of course I contacted my models I will be working with and assured them I was not canceling and would love to still work with all of them.

It will be interesting to see how many make the trip.

Luckily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  The two main models I want to work with have already assured me that they will be attending despite the summary cancellation.

___

Now, having said all of this, has any photographer EVER had a good experience at one?  I like the theory of multiple models in one place and time but in practice the concept might be impossible.

no

Jun 23 09 03:29 pm Link

Photographer

pullins photography

Posts: 5884

Troy, Michigan, US

Capitol Images wrote:
Last group shoot i attended got busted by the LVPD, so no luck here.

busted for what?

Jun 23 09 03:29 pm Link

Photographer

Bill Clearlake Photos

Posts: 2214

San Jose, California, US

I attended one that was a great success - a few photos from it are in my portfolio.  Then I had an idea and wanted to do a themed group shoot based on the idea.

I contacted the person who organized the shoot I attended who agreed to be my assistant.

I contacted a venue I wanted to use (and here's where things started to go sideways).  The venue insisted that they couldn't give me an estimate until they knew the number of attendees.  So I started collecting people who were interested in doing the shoot.  Once I had an idea of numbers, I contacted the venue again and got their estimate.  Their fees were way out of line for what I intended and the hours they would be available wouldn't have worked. 

So, I secured a second venue that was closer to my assistant and my assistant's contacts.  We worked out a fee scale and schedule.  I posted the schedule and rates to attend. 

Right about that time, my assistant had a family emergency and dropped out of the project.  This person knew many of the models, photographers and fashion designers I was hoping would attend the shoot.  I'm sure a lot of those folks also chose not to attend.

By then, some of the folks that had expressed interest got hooked into another larger event that was happening around the same time.  The rest of the people waited to see who signed onto to which times before they would commit.

I pulled the plug.  Event canceled.

So, that was my first attempt at a large-scale group shoot.  But I'm the kind of person who rarely gets things right the first time (which I why I don't sky-dive).

The idea is a good one and I still want to do it.  Now that I've learned a few things about organizing a group shoot, the next one should go well.

Jun 23 09 03:46 pm Link

Photographer

Ugly Hugo

Posts: 1

Oswego, Illinois, US

Had my first group shot last week. As someone who is still an amateur with model photography, it helped me learn a lot in a very short afternoon. I came out of it with some cool shots and a few new good friends. It also led to a smaller one-model shoot just two days later. We even had a passer-by who owns a tanning salon trade information with us. It's something you have to do, because you never know what's going to happen.

On the flip side, I see how it could be a disaster. It helped that everyone there was at least a friend of a friend. Pre-meetings aren't a bad idea.

Jun 23 09 03:50 pm Link

Photographer

Ryan L Holbrook

Posts: 631

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

I have found for every additional model beyond the first you try and schedule for a shoot, the difficulty experimentally grows when them showing up, or in a timely manor.  I tried doing one with 6 models once.  After the 3rd cancellation I said to hell with it, I will shoot them on their own and photoshop it, lol.  Never did get around to doing it though.  I am not saying it is the models fault.  I see the same thing when I try and get groups of friends to hang out.

Jun 23 09 03:55 pm Link

Photographer

bencook2

Posts: 3875

Tucson, Arizona, US

Christopher Hartman wrote:

How can they attend an event that was cancelled?  And why would they be concerned that YOU cancelled on them if the event was cancelled and you didn't show up.

I myself would feel kind of foolish showing up to a cancelled event.

This question has already been answered.

Jun 23 09 05:25 pm Link

Photographer

Dave Mullins

Posts: 1775

Nashua, New Hampshire, US

Pix #s 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 15, 16, 17, and 19 in my port came from group shoots I have worked. Now most of them I set up the lighting for the participants. I usually don't shoot at these types of shoots for a few reasons:

1:
Most models are new and don't know how to, or have very limited knowledge of posing. So lets say she knows 20 poses, she does them for each photographer. The images she gets are of the same pose, with the same outfit, from each of the photographers.


2:
Myself, as an experienced photographer, direct a model do a new pose. Well the next three photographers in line get her to do the exact same pose for them. They may do a quick edit and post the image before I have a chance to. So it would look like I am the copy cat when it was my own idea. Thus "stealing" my shot and vision.


3:
Gang Bang Shoots; 10 or more photographers fighting over position and the models attention at the same time. This is just a major clusterfuck and no one should attend anything like this.


Having said this, the following link is to an image from the latest group shoot I attended and worked. Now the four sets that were set up there were using all my personal lighting equipment.

This image is from one of the sets where I made some large Cucoloris "cookies" to project from a Beseler Slide King, Magic lantern projector. The slides are 3.25" x 4" in size. With a 750W bulb our exposure was 1/15 sec - f4.0 @ ISO 400. I plan on installing a AB400 strobe in the projector for the next shoot I do with it.


18+
http://home.comcast.net/~n323xl/IMG_2600B_web.jpg


Malodave

Jun 23 09 05:26 pm Link

Photographer

BRISBANEbikini

Posts: 341

pullins photography wrote:
busted for what?

Taking up all the resident parking and creating mayhem in the street apparently, no models or photographers were visible from the street at anytime, obviously some one noted our arrivals and called the cops.

Jun 23 09 05:31 pm Link

Photographer

Model With Camera

Posts: 1807

Huntington, New York, US

no plans to...

Jun 23 09 08:06 pm Link

Photographer

Craig Thomson

Posts: 13462

Tacoma, Washington, US

nwprophoto wrote:
Good for networking, usually lousy for photography.

+1

Jun 23 09 08:08 pm Link

Photographer

Magic Image Photography

Posts: 3606

Temple City, California, US

With an understanding that most of the photogs that attend thies photoclub shoots go on a regular basis you might get a lil tug here and there from some of them. Yes it is there shoot and they tend to hog the models by asking them to pose like if the model was there for them. I had a situation where i confronted a photog for asking the model to pose just about every shot that was being taken, mind you its not a problem if the guy is a pro photog and knows what poses look reat but this guy had an eye of a pirate the poses were dead and unusable. So yeah bad expierances do happen but you might get lucky and get some nice pics once in awhile.

Jun 23 09 08:11 pm Link

Photographer

Bill Tracy Photography

Posts: 2322

Montague, New Jersey, US

These things are usually just a scam to make money off of GWC's who just want to get in the same room with some half naked models who would normally turn them down for shoots.

Jun 23 09 08:13 pm Link

Photographer

bencook2

Posts: 3875

Tucson, Arizona, US

Bill Tracy Photography wrote:
These things are usually just a scam to make money off of GWC's who just want to get in the same room with some half naked models who would normally turn them down for shoots.

I have no doubt that what you say happens.  I saw the photog list, some good talent.

This one just sucked because of the coordinator. 

BTW great image of Jillian!

Jun 23 09 08:20 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Dave Mullins wrote:
Most models are new and don't know how to, or have very limited knowledge of posing.

Not even the case here.  This is a list of superstar MM models (and photographers) who are some of the most talented posing princesses on this site... wink

https://www.modelmayhem.com/list.php?list_id=1338

Jun 23 09 08:34 pm Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

There was a recent shootout in New York state that was very good.  One of the models was a well known model from Prague, Czech Republic.

Jun 23 09 08:34 pm Link

Photographer

bencook2

Posts: 3875

Tucson, Arizona, US

Gary, don't forget to send my $5 you promised if I started a thread on "group shoots".

You still have my address right?  :-)

Jun 23 09 08:43 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Select Models wrote:

Not even the case here.  This is a list of superstar MM models (and photographers) who are some of the most talented posing princesses on this site... wink

https://www.modelmayhem.com/list.php?list_id=1338

I wouldn't define your paid events as group shoots in the traditional sense....IMHO

Jun 23 09 10:08 pm Link

Photographer

rich cirminello

Posts: 1035

Dallas, Texas, US

Bethlehem Photography wrote:
I did a strobist meet at the Eastern State Penn and it was a blast!!! Three photographers to one model and we bounced lighting scenarios off each other. We worked with four different models.. I was happy.
A MM event at ESP. 100 + models and photographers. I had all my models scheduled prior to to the shoot sooo it was one on one and no one shooting over my shoulder.
Now for the bad:
Local meet up. 6 photographers shooting one model at a time. Seriously sucked.......

I really think a lot has to do with the organizer.

What you are describing at the end of your post is a gang-bang shoot. Avoid those at all costs.
I have been a member of a group of shooters in the SF bay area that totally rocks. The photographers are all cool, we learn from each other and have developed good friendships with each other and with the models the organizer brings in.

The way it runs is that we take turns, usually 10 minutes each shooting the hired model. There is a limited number of photographers and one or two top notch models at each event  ~ except during our San Jose to Vegas shooting road trip; in that case there were 2 models and 6 photographers all crammed in a club van with gear and wardrobe (very cozy and great for networking.)... shot one additional model along the way in Hesperia and a 4th met us in Vegas...

The upside is that during your time you can do whatever you want with the lighting and model ~ it's your time. Photographers waiting their turn are usually willing to assist.
The only real downside is that we all shoot the same model with the same wardrobe (or lack of it) but it has taught me to be creative and think quickly.

This particular group also hires some top traveling talent; many models come to the area just to shoot with the group and in the 15mos I have been part of it, we only had one flake and I think the sub that stood in turned out better than the original.

Having said that, I have been to a few other group shoots that were totally a waste of time.
Like someone said earlier, it really depends on the organizer.

Jun 23 09 11:33 pm Link

Photographer

rich cirminello

Posts: 1035

Dallas, Texas, US

Bill Tracy Photography wrote:
These things are usually just a scam to make money off of GWC's who just want to get in the same room with some half naked models who would normally turn them down for shoots.

Could be, and I have been to a few that were like that. But it depends on the organizer.

Jun 23 09 11:36 pm Link

Photographer

Micyl Sweeney

Posts: 7442

Madison, Alabama, US

bencook2 wrote:
I have read the horror stories of shoots being a mixture of a photographic gang-bang and an exercise in herding cats.  But, like everything else in my life I had to experience it first.  Oh, wait.  The shoot was canceled.

For two weeks I have kept a neat schedule of models attend the shoot that will be working with me.  I planned to keep to myself, not attending the "gang-bang" portions where photographers crowd around models.  Then today the shoot's organizer calls it off for some cryptic reason.

Of course I contacted my models I will be working with and assured them I was not canceling and would love to still work with all of them.

It will be interesting to see how many make the trip.

Luckily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  The two main models I want to work with have already assured me that they will be attending despite the summary cancellation.

___

Now, having said all of this, has any photographer EVER had a good experience at one?  I like the theory of multiple models in one place and time but in practice the concept might be impossible.

I shoot group shoots however it is a group of models and only me, no other photographers. To me that is the best way. I might allow one or two photographers to shoot with me if I know them. I have in the past.

Those huge group shoots you are talking about with alot of photographers to me were never appealing. Maybe for the models but as a photographer I cannot see the benefit from them and dealing with all the bs so I just do my own group shoots.

Jun 23 09 11:40 pm Link

Photographer

rich cirminello

Posts: 1035

Dallas, Texas, US

Forgot to mention... my avatar is from a recent group shoot.

they are a great way to access high quality modeling talent if you don't have the budget (or portfolio) to hire them 1-1.

Jun 23 09 11:46 pm Link

Photographer

rich cirminello

Posts: 1035

Dallas, Texas, US

Micyl Sweeney wrote:

I shoot group shoots however it is a group of models and only me, no other photographers. To me that is the best way. I might allow one or two photographers to shoot with me if I know them. I have in the past.

Those huge group shoots you are talking about with alot of photographers to me were never appealing. Maybe for the models but as a photographer I cannot see the benefit from them and dealing with all the bs so I just do my own group shoots.

How do you afford to pay several models all yourself?

Jun 23 09 11:48 pm Link

Photographer

Images by Yancy

Posts: 1703

Roseville, California, US

I once attended a group shoot in SoCal that was a benefit for the sick child of a popular make-up artist.

Packed up all my gear and made the 8 hour drive to the shoot. The location was a ranch with a little "main street" facade. I met the other attendees and chatted up some of the models then proceeded to set-up inside the "saloon". And it was game on.

Worked with lots of models and photographers. I made a point to share my lighting and set-ups with other photographers, especially those that had never shot with lights. This went on for many hours. Towards the end of the night, a couple of models that I knew well and had worked with many times from my area showed up and came looking for me. These girls are primarily nude models and, since I had shot nudes off and on all day, we got right to work. Got some great images and still managed to share my set with other photographers. We finally wrapped it up and went to late dinner with many of my new photography friends.

Sounds like a good day, right?

About a week later I'm informed of a scandal brewing regarding. Seems that the local newspaper were informed that there was a photography shoot out at this ranch and that pornography was being openly shot despite the fact that the shoot was a benefit for a child! Shocking! I have to admit I was outraged myself until it occurred to me that they were talking about me!! WTF?! We shot some nudes in a closed set on private property. And when I was invited, someone had obviously looked at my port and saw exactly what style I shot! I was trying to do a good deed and end up getting vilified in a newspaper article.

Even worse, they wanted to ban further shoots at this ranch because of the negative publicity, even though most events were benefits for some good cause or another! In an odd way I felt responsible for that. Anyway, eventually all the fuss blew over. But it was pretty crappy there for awhile.

The good news is that I made many good connections and friends at this shoot. And I still have a couple of shots on my port.

But I haven't done a group shoot since.

Jun 23 09 11:57 pm Link

Photographer

Coogan Photo

Posts: 821

Phoenix, Arizona, US

I've been to about 6 group shoots with multiple photographers and models, each one was positive, and I got portfolio images from each.

...though I'll say it was a learning curve, that you have to stay focused (pun intended) on the goal(s), and in my case was to get portfolio images from each shoot.  It's easy to get distracted when there are so many people around with different agendas, so try and have a plan and then execute it like a laser beam.

Jun 24 09 12:09 am Link

Photographer

Laura Dark Photography

Posts: 6812

Columbus, Ohio, US

It's really too bad to see that so many of you are against group shoots.  sad 

I run one of (if not THE) largest in Ohio.  I have a 70,000 sq ft warehouse/haunted house as a backdrop.  I have security, someone to run the elevator, a full time concession stand, a smoking area, a photographers area for equipment and chatting, a model area with makeup tables, mirrors and changing area, and we can shoot from 10am till 8pm at night.

Most of the people who come once, return.  I have models from NY, FL, KY, WV, VA, PA, IN, IL, GA, and even had a girl in town a year ago from CA that attended.  Most of the photographers, models, MUAs, and wardrobe stylists, leave with portfolio worthy images.  The talent gets better and better every year.   I see no end in sight for my events on the size they can grow and the talent that can emerge from them.

P.S.  I wouldn't have met Kat Livingston if I wouldn't have held these events and that would make me a sad Laura Dark.  sad

Jun 24 09 06:39 am Link

Photographer

A_Nova_Photography

Posts: 8652

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US

I've been to good ones where you schedule model time and it's always 1 on 1 and bad ones where it has been a GWC shoot... It's definitely a learning experience.

We had one this past Saturday and it went over well... You need more models than photographers and definitely a bunch of MUA's so that models can be going in and out of makeup without a huge wait...

Jun 24 09 07:06 am Link

Photographer

Vamp Boudoir

Posts: 11446

Florence, South Carolina, US

bencook2 wrote:
Now, having said all of this, has any photographer EVER had a good experience at one?  I like the theory of multiple models in one place and time but in practice the concept might be impossible.

No!

Shootouts are worse that opening day at Macy's on Black Friday.

Jun 24 09 07:11 am Link

Model

Kat Livingston

Posts: 1645

Brooklyn, New York, US

Laura Dark Photography wrote:
It's really too bad to see that so many of you are against group shoots.  sad 

P.S.  I wouldn't have met Kat Livingston if I wouldn't have held these events and that would make me a sad Laura Dark.  sad

This is true. And Laura is the reason I keep making the 1,320 mile round-trip to go the Ohio events. She puts on one hell-of-an event and I have always been pleased with the productions. I know that many other events are not- nor ever could be- as well executed as those that Laura runs and I don't want to give anyone false hope. I would RATHER that people strive to put on group shoots that could rival those that I speak of. If that happened, I think many more people would attend them! They are possibly THE best way to work with mulitple people in one day. Those from all different genres, talent levels, and home states. All in one building!?
You can't beat that wink

Jun 24 09 07:11 am Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

Rebel Photo wrote:

No!

Shootouts are worse that opening day at Macy's on Black Friday.

You have gone to the wrong ones!    smile

Jun 24 09 07:17 am Link

Photographer

JA Sanchez

Posts: 6830

Miami, Florida, US

The top photographers and models typically will not be the ones that attend or benefit from group shoots, but of course not everyone is at the top of their game. Most are not.

I admit that from time to time I've thought that it might be fun to attend a group shoot with a P&S camera. That way it would really be just a way to say hello, take some reference images of models (like polariods really), and exchange contact information so that perhaps later we can schedule a more serious 1on1 session. In a way it would be more of a networking thing then a group shoot, but that's just the way I would approach it personally.

Jun 24 09 07:59 am Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

bencook2 wrote:
Gary, don't forget to send my $5 you promised if I started a thread on "group shoots".

You still have my address right?  :-)

LOL Ben... thanks for the kudos... and I seem to have misplaced your address... lol

Jun 24 09 12:23 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

Cherrystone wrote:
I wouldn't define your paid events as group shoots in the traditional sense....IMHO

Is there really such a thing as a 'traditional sense' group event?  Most all group shoot events I've encountered here on MM require some form of pay from either the photographers or the models (or both) to cover location costs, MUA & hairstylist expenses and some type of operational costs... so what exactly would you define my group shoots as?... wink

Jun 24 09 12:35 pm Link

Photographer

LeDeux Art

Posts: 50123

San Ramon, California, US

bencook2 wrote:

sage wisdom!

This was my first mistake.

so you learned somthing

Jun 24 09 12:47 pm Link

Photographer

StudioBBoonePhotography

Posts: 923

Georgetown, Ohio, US

Jun 24 09 04:40 pm Link

Photographer

StudioBBoonePhotography

Posts: 923

Georgetown, Ohio, US

Chris Macan wrote:
Group shoots are only as good as the organizer.

I agree. When thhe organizer cancelles and everyone else still plans on attending if someone does not step forward to try and have some simblance of a plan then the gang bang starts... Has to be someone calling the shots or their will be too many chiefs and not enough indians...

Jun 24 09 04:56 pm Link

Photographer

bencook2

Posts: 3875

Tucson, Arizona, US

LeDeux Art wrote:

so you learned somthing

I did...  MM lives another day.

Jun 24 09 05:33 pm Link