Stacy Solar wrote:
how bout me?

Hi Stace!
One thing that is a turn off in your bio is only selectively crediting shooters whom you feel are worthy of it. I say list or don't list.  Actually I say don't list but I know people like to fill the credit section of their biography. I just don't see it making anyone feel cozy inside that you found them not worth listing.

The shot posted on your bio page makes you look like you're hiding your tummy. Its a self conscious pose. Even if you did it subconsciously, viewers get a certain message from that sort of a pose.
I like that you always bring a strong aspect of styling to your shoots. It shows you think about a shoot before you show up and that you care.

Jessica Vaugn  wrote:

Like your work! My only critique is not being too fond of low contrast. I think people use it for sort of a flare look or vintage tone, but, just not my preference. That is all it is though, a preference.

Wow, that was surprising.  Thanks for the confidence booster

amycore wrote:
I'd like to know! :]

Hi amy!
Aren't you just a saucy little wide-eyed funky creature?
I dig it.
Take your email off your profile unless you like spam and scam mail people will send you when its up for public viewing with no regulation. How would you handle a phone stalker if you had one from your number being public?
Get yourself a google voice application to forward and hide your real number for privacy so you can have a business line. Its free. And no one will know its not your real number. It forwards to your existing phone handset.
Be safe sweets! Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't!!

Annie RS wrote:
Me please?

You're dead sexy!

I like your hair both colors.

I think you can bump your level of shooters, press on soldier!!!

Jessica Vaugn  wrote:

You're dead sexy!

I like your hair both colors.

I think you can bump your level of shooters, press on soldier!!!

Thanks jessica!

jennifer1502 wrote:
ooh, yes please!

Yay Asian #4!!
(Is it ok to be so happy about such a coincidence?)


I think you'd make a good nude model and this is why:
Your implied nude shot emotes something...real.
Your other shots are cute but no works of art as you're just not dippin into yourself.


...Besides we'd like to see you naked. LOL Just kidding.

Kamarose wrote:
I'd like to know what Jessica Vaugn thinks.

Hi sweets!
This art nude thing is working for you.
Keep the body all natural and you can play it up for some time to come!
Professional bio. It works.

Lauren WK wrote:
I'd love to know what you think.

Num num Num.... nummy

Singing a song to myself as I figure out how I can get you at a shoot with me! I'd love to model with you.

kick ass.

Hannah OBrien wrote:
Would love to know your thoughts! 

Well look at that, finally an MUA!




Good makeup here. Don't be afraid to trim and shape and gel eye brows (as long as you know how)...[[[Furry bitches get shaved in my chair... muh ha ha ha!]]]
Individual (short, brown) lashes would be good to fill in her lashes and still look very clean and natural for the look you were going for.
Barbasol rubbed in the palms will eliminate the fly-aways of her hair when other products fail.

K E S L E R wrote:
whos jessica vaugn?

Jerkface.

Make it up to me by shooting me again

Jessica Vaugn  wrote:

Hi Stace!
One thing that is a turn off in your bio is only selectively crediting shooters whom you feel are worthy of it. I say list or don't list.  Actually I say don't list but I know people like to fill the credit section of their biography. I just don't see it making anyone feel cozy inside that you found them not worth listing.

The shot posted on your bio page makes you look like you're hiding your tummy. Its a self conscious pose. Even if you did it subconsciously, viewers get a certain message from that sort of a pose.
I like that you always bring a strong aspect of styling to your shoots. It shows you think about a shoot before you show up and that you care.

woops, didnt mean to disregard anyone in my credits! and i always thought that about the photo, but no one has ever told me. Deleted! thank you very much:)

Hannah Kaufmann wrote:
I'd like to know!

Hi girl!
My critique of your work is that the light is pretty much flat and lackluster. Try experimenting with higher key and more contrast at your upcoming shoots!
The diagrams in tutorials are pretty useful while exploring new options.

Good Egg Productions wrote:
I'll play!  Thanks!

Hi Greg, looks like you have something all your own here!
use more reflector fill in front when you are shooting outdoor back lit shots.
Keep it real

Daniel M Martin wrote:
Let's hear it.................thanks.

I love the lines and anonymity of this shot. Also, the higher contrast black and white is much more appealing than another black and white low contrast conversion you have posted.
https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … up_id=&ua=

DonnaToni wrote:
Me? Please. =]

hey girl!
No shame in being short so don't draw attention to it by adding it to your bio, especially when its so short. (No pun intended) 
Love the bangs. Keep them. Flat iron the rest of your hair stick straight for your next shoot.
Best wishes!

nicole deannaa wrote:
me?

Hi Nicole,

Welcome to our world

Learn about the beauty of cheek contouring to define your facial features. Visit a Sephora and ask what they recommended for you. It will change you!
Just keep shooting and grow as it comes. Its a lot of work but rewarding.

iBeauty Photography wrote:
I would love to know what Jessica thinks :-)

I almost didn't recognize you... Name change working well for you??

Still hoping we can do a trade for ticket your so we can shoot a few hours sometime!
All I can suggest for your work is pre-plan. Looks like your best stuff has forethought.

Nicole M Berg wrote:
Me?

Anxious to see what Dan does with you soon. Great choice and hope you come back with some real book worthy shots!
The images you have now are just leaving me wanting. I don't know, low grade PS work on them (not your fault). I just can't say I'd know what I was getting from what you have right now.

Jessica Vaugn  wrote:

Anxious to see what Dan does with you soon. Great choice and hope you come back with some real book worthy shots!
The images you have now are just leaving me wanting. I don't know, low grade PS work on them (not your fault). I just can't say I'd know what I was getting from what you have right now.

I have 2 unedited images from Dan posted already. He said he'd have some edits to me in a couple of weeks. And what do you mean by PS work? Any helpful hints or suggestions?

Lauren A Farrington wrote:
I'd like a critique, please.

Hey Lauren!
if fashion is your passion like your port says, soak yourself in it. Pay the 20 bucks for a foreign fashion magazine every month and drink it in. Fashion sells a lifestyle and a mindset. Till you know what those things are, you can never express it in your images. Also, make sure if you want to do beauty images, you use beauty models. They are hard to find till you hit a certain point, but, it makes or breaks a beauty photo. I say stick with body based models for fashion tests will you are firm in what you want to shoot.

Try a French Vogue, V, or others similar that can be found at Barnes and Noble.

Jessie-Lynne wrote:
very curious as to what you think of my portfolio

I love that you are truly different. Awesome book and hot work!

Know Idea wrote:
Blow me like ya know me, homie.

Sexy work. I like the low key. Good taste in models.

SI - Art in Images wrote:
Love to hear your thoughts

I say lower the opacity on your skin treatments... the plug in is just a tad too heavy. good work!

Greg Christensen wrote:
If you get the time let me know what you think

Thanks
Greg

Hi Greg,

Standardize your crop sizes. Its hard for us to print images given with crops and ratios that vary.

I like where you're going with the glam. Pursue 3 point lighting. I think you hav ejust the sort of models you should... not that that seems like a hard thing but you'd be surprised how many people's models don't line up with their direction.

Jessica Vaugn  wrote:

Hey Lauren!
if fashion is your passion like your port says, soak yourself in it. Pay the 20 bucks for a foreign fashion magazine every month and drink it in. Fashion sells a lifestyle and a mindset. Till you know what those things are, you can never express it in your images. Also, make sure if you want to do beauty images, you use beauty models. They are hard to find till you hit a certain point, but, it makes or breaks a beauty photo. I say stick with body based models for fashion tests will you are firm in what you want to shoot.

Try a French Vogue, V, or others similar that can be found at Barnes and Noble.

I used to buy magazines a lot, actually. And then I got poor. Maybe I can put away a few bucks for a Vogue every month.
Thanks for the feedback.

AltiFlex 66 wrote:
Please and thank you.

When I look at your work the distinction and overall efficiency difference between your studio and location work has created quite the gap.
Do you have a photo journalist background?

Your studio work is lackluster and boring. Kick it up with mentoring or workshops that focus on lighting sets ups in the studio environment OR decided its just not your playground!