EricaDean wrote:
Nice try you salty ol' perv. We all know where you are everytime Fantasy Fest rolls around.

sosdezign wrote:
I've been ta every one, do that make me BAD  .  .  .    Of course, I ONLY go down there to share my artistic talents  .  .  .  doin' body paint jobs with finger paints  .  .  . 

SOS

I'm quite sure that's roughly equal to the painting I saw the elephant do during the circus pre-show.

I'm feeling cheap - Old Smuggler for all.

EricaDean wrote:

EricaDean wrote:
Nice try you salty ol' perv. We all know where you are everytime Fantasy Fest rolls around.

I'm quite sure that's roughly equal to the painting I saw the elephant do during the circus pre-show.

I'm feeling cheap - Old Smuggler for all.

"Cheap" women, Old Smuggler, and Fantasy Fest  .  .  .  perfect  .  .  .    Now, where's dem damned paints at  .  .  .

SOS

EricaDean wrote:

EricaDean wrote:
Nice try you salty ol' perv. We all know where you are everytime Fantasy Fest rolls around.

I'm quite sure that's roughly equal to the painting I saw the elephant do during the circus pre-show.

I'm feeling cheap - Old Smuggler for all.

Let's hope SOS isn't painting with his "trunk"....

EricaDean wrote:
I had a squirrel climb on my leg this morning. It made me happy.

Squirrels are rats with designer tails...

Frank Lewis Photography wrote:

Squirrels are rats with designer tails...

And better PR firms...

Frank Lewis Photography wrote:
Squirrels are rats with designer tails...

sure sure sure

J Marshall Photography wrote:
I'm still getting used to the fact that Florida Squirrels bark.  That kinda stuff isn't natural in Indiana.  Still remember jumping the first time one did that to me down here.

Yep, Florida squirrels can be aggressive...

Gimme dat damn nut!!!

Frank Lewis Photography wrote:

Yep, Florida squirrels can be aggressive...

Gimme dat damn nut!!!

They can get thier own nut, mine are off limits.  have found piles of acorn shells at my doorstep before.

EricaDean wrote:

Nice try you salty ol' perv. We all know where you are everytime Fantasy Fest rolls around.

Rolls?

H E R B L I S H wrote:

Rolls?

Buns??

Walker1812 Photography wrote:
Tad and I looking at solid gold.... "objects" at the gallery show opening thingy last night for me...

Don't worry Frank was right there with us just out of shot... I think he got distracted by a pretty lady

Congrats on your success

Just wonderful!

Good for you brother

Carl Roberts wrote:

Congrats on your success

Just wonderful!

Good for you brother

thank you, don't know if it is success but it's step in the right direction

Scott A Miller photo wrote:
I so want to slap people like this..

http://orlando.craigslist.org/evg/2165188008.html

Just wow.

I mean, I rarely work Weddings, and as such, I don't charge too high of a rate.  But 250 for 5 hours, plus full copyright release?  ermmm...

Yeah, I don't see that going well.

Can't say much though, and swear to god this is true...

Friend of mine shot a wedding once, and the food at the recepetion.

Yes.

Little Ceasers

(and bottled soda)...

He wonders why I'm really picky about it.

J Marshall Photography wrote:

Just wow.

I mean, I rarely work Weddings, and as such, I don't charge too high of a rate.  But 250 for 5 hours, plus full copyright release?  ermmm...

Yeah, I don't see that going well.

Can't say much though, and swear to god this is true...

Friend of mine shot a wedding once, and the food at the recepetion.

Yes.

Little Ceasers

(and bottled soda)...

He wonders why I'm really picky about it.

5 hours day of... plus the rehersal the night before...

Works out at 6 hours to be $41/hour BEFORE expenses and I have ranted on that way to much to spend the energy to do it again.

Ask Wolfie, he kept my last one..

Scott A Miller photo wrote:

5 hours day of... plus the rehersal the night before...

Works out at 6 hours to be $41/hour BEFORE expenses and I have ranted on that way to much to spend the energy to do it again.

Ask Wolfie, he kept my last one..

True, didn't even think about day before.  Just wow.

No need to expend any more energy, i think photographers of the world all facepalm'ing in Unison would create enough kinetic energy to power that one....

Walker1812 Photography wrote:
Tad and I looking at solid gold.... "objects" at the gallery show opening thingy last night for me...

Don't worry Frank was right there with us just out of shot... I think he got distracted by a pretty lady

What are you drinking Jesse; Fairvilla special wine?

Keith aka Wolfie wrote:

Buns??

Klaws!

H E R B L I S H wrote:

What are you drinking Jesse; Fairvilla special wine?

Well his drink is gold colored

Carl Roberts wrote:
What's the story with the weather and the meet & Greet?

Stephanie Abrams should come!


Here she is doing implied weather TF!

Carl Roberts wrote:
What's the story with the weather and the meet & Greet?

Mostly sunny, rain won't be the worry, but it will be about 60 degrees outside

Scott A Miller photo wrote:
Saw this in another thread, but had to post here

http://www.whas11.com/home/Doctor-faces … 89699.html

Personally I don't think the doc should be sued. The patient was in surgery and it has been my experience that before surgeries the patient signs a paper stating whether they want to be woken up from surgery if an extenuating circumstance such as this occurs....

Walker1812 Photography wrote:

Mostly sunny, rain won't be the worry, but it will be about 60 degrees outside

Sounds like the Pearl Jam video of "Jeremy"

Scott A Miller photo wrote:
I so want to slap people like this..

http://orlando.craigslist.org/evg/2165188008.html

I sent them a nastygram myself..  What a fucking a joke..  Bet they spent more on the flowers than they want to spend on the pics...


Now, if I can shoot it with my Blackberry while sucking down tequila shots, we might have a deal...

Scott A Miller photo wrote:
Saw this in another thread, but had to post here

http://www.whas11.com/home/Doctor-faces … 89699.html

Wrongful amputation?

Mark Reese Photography wrote:

Personally I don't think the doc should be sued. The patient was in surgery and it has been my experience that before surgeries the patient signs a paper stating whether they want to be woken up from surgery if an extenuating circumstance such as this occurs....

It would be one thing if it was related to what the surgery was for, but these two things are QUITE different...  The doctor was negligent just on the basis of common sense.. Let alone malpractice..

Keith aka Wolfie wrote:

It would be one thing if it was related to what the surgery was for, but these two things are QUITE different...  The doctor was negligent just on the basis of common sense.. Let alone malpractice..

I have a feeling we are going to see more and more of these types of things on youtube!

Keith aka Wolfie wrote:

It would be one thing if it was related to what the surgery was for, but these two things are QUITE different...  The doctor was negligent just on the basis of common sense.. Let alone malpractice..

According to the article he was being circumcised and the doc saw a cancerous growth during the procedure... imo that's related, since it ws on the part being operated on originally.

Mark Reese Photography wrote:

According to the article he was being circumcised and the doc saw a cancerous growth during the procedure... imo that's related, since it ws on the part being operated on originally.

Circumcitional Evidence!

Mark Reese Photography wrote:
According to the article he was being circumcised and the doc saw a cancerous growth during the procedure... imo that's related, since it ws on the part being operated on originally.

But not what he went in for.. One has to assume that the patient wasn't aware of the cancer. Therefore, he should have been made aware of that situation prior to lopping off his manhood!!  And I suspect that there was a medical history taken so the doctor would have been aware that the patient was not aware of the cancer, OR, was refusing to acknowledge it. Regardless, if it wasn't on the history, he shouldn't have freed willy..

Keith aka Wolfie wrote:
But not what he went in for.. One has to assume that the patient wasn't aware of the cancer. Therefore, he should have been made aware of that situation prior to lopping off his manhood!!  And I suspect that there was a medical history taken so the doctor would have been aware that the patient was not aware of the cancer, OR, was refusing to acknowledge it. Regardless, if it wasn't on the history, he shouldn't have freed willy..

Assume not a thing?

Walker1812 Photography wrote:
Tad and I looking at solid gold.... "objects" at the gallery show opening thingy last night for me...

Don't worry Frank was right there with us just out of shot... I think he got distracted by a pretty lady

Was Frank clothed, or non clothed  .  .  .    How long is the show hangin'  .  .  .  boy, did THAT sound wrong  .  .  . 

SOS

Mark Reese Photography wrote:

According to the article he was being circumcised and the doc saw a cancerous growth during the procedure... imo that's related, since it ws on the part being operated on originally.

But the lawsuit alleges that the doctor was not given authorization to remove his penis.
And it indicates that performing the procedure deprived Seaton the opportunity to get a second opinion.
The cancer turned out to be a stage one cancer, considered by many medical experts to be treatable.

sosdezign wrote:
Was Frank clothed, or non clothed  .  .  .    How long is the show hangin'  .  .  .  boy, did THAT sound wrong  .  .  . 

SOS

It will be up for at least a month
(maybe it should consult a doctor)

Walker1812 Photography wrote:

It will be up for at least a month
(maybe it should consult a doctor)

I'll havta stop in  .  .  .  strictly for the artistic merit of it of course  .  .  .  is it upstairs in the "restraints" section, or in da theater  .  .  . 

SOS

sosdezign wrote:

I'll havta stop in  .  .  .  strictly for the artistic merit of it of course  .  .  .  is it upstairs in the "restraints" section, or in da theater  .  .  . 

SOS

Upstairs in the balcony area and a couple other pieces scattered around