Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Meghan Devlin wrote: How can I improve my placement? Work with better photographers and MUA. I think you have more potential but I am not sure. Lets see if they can bring it out of you.
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
I want to complain and get all butthurt, but I had a long day. Can I postpone my tantrum until Wednesday or so? I'll buy the beer to make up for it. Fair?
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Sophistocles wrote: I want to complain and get all butthurt, but I had a long day. Can I postpone my tantrum until Wednesday or so? I'll buy the beer to make up for it. Fair? Sure, I will give you until 11pm Pacific time on Wednesday.
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Alicia Hansen Photo wrote: Want to make it two? Alicia Hansen Photo : https://www.modelmayhem.com/690955 Sorry, Deirdre Holmes beat you to it. Only 2 females allowed. It is in the union rules. Something about you girls making us look bad.
Photographer
This User Is Not Here
Posts: 1964
Durango, Colorado, US
Dan K Photography wrote: Sorry, Deirdre Holmes beat you to it. Only 2 females allowed. It is in the union rules. Something about you girls making us look bad. Damn unions. *shakes fist*
Photographer
le roy le croix
Posts: 1268
Grove Place, Saint Croix, Virgin Islands of the United States
Dan K Photography wrote: Shitty togs like you make me want to throw all my equipment away. I'm going to assume this is a compliment ... Unless you mean - 'I have to throw my equipment away... because, I find your photos so offensively bad I can not even bare to look at another photo again for fear my eyes will burn, as if by acid, and melt out of my head while I scream in agony.'
Model
MelissaAnn
Posts: 3971
Seattle, Washington, US
joining in the fun.
Model
Tegan Lynn
Posts: 993
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Alicia Hansen Photo wrote: Damn unions. *shakes fist* I read that as damn unicorns...
Photographer
This User Is Not Here
Posts: 1964
Durango, Colorado, US
Tegan Lynn wrote: I read that as damn unicorns... Damn unicorns. *shakes fist*
Photographer
Garry k
Posts: 30129
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Photographer
Amul La La
Posts: 885
London, England, United Kingdom
Couldn't Egle been ranked a little higher, I'm making that assumption based upon her avi/
Photographer
Amul La La
Posts: 885
London, England, United Kingdom
Model
Rae Johnston
Posts: 1481
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Why not?
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Dan K Photography wrote: ahh but I am not like most people. Yes you are.
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Jorge Kreimer wrote: Yes you are. I am like most people or I am not like most people?
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Deirdre Holmes wrote: I'm going to assume this is a compliment ... Unless you mean - 'I have to throw my equipment away... because, I find your photos so offensively bad I can not even bare to look at another photo again for fear my eyes will burn, as if by acid, and melt out of my head while I scream in agony.' I will leave you guessing which I actually meant.
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Done to Randall Photography. Will get to the rest late afternoon.
Photographer
Aaron Lewis Photography
Posts: 5217
Catskill, New York, US
Wow I must really suck I stay right at the bottom of that list
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Garry k wrote: I am pretty rank do me That pickup like has worked before. Trufax. As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people.
Photographer
sospix
Posts: 23769
Orlando, Florida, US
I haven't changed my sox (or my drawers) in a few days, so I'm kinda "rank" . . . SOS
Model
_eMMe_
Posts: 866
Florence, Toscana, Italy
Sophistocles wrote: That pickup like has worked before. Trufax. As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people. Absolutely
Photographer
Erin Dawson Photography
Posts: 334
Olney, Maryland, US
Alicia Hansen Photo wrote: Damn unions. *shakes fist* Actually there's 4 of us now, as I also have a vagina.
Model
Jes K
Posts: 15
Ann Arbor, Michigan, US
Photographer
Vincente Lopez
Posts: 125
Seattle, Washington, US
Dan K Photography wrote: I have always found it impossible to be consistent across multiple pages of 1-100 critics etc and have probably failed to do so. A ranking system will help me do so. Here is how it works. I will rank models and photographers only. It will be one column for each ranked from what my worthless opinion considers best (top of column) to worst. This is just for fun and no one should take it to seriously. Though I do tend to take it seriously myself. I enjoy butthurt responses and encourage them if you so wish. I will even accept arguments by pm on why so and so should be ranked higher. But not from the ranked person himself. It is possible though unlikely to change my mind. Especially if you ask for my paypal email. If you are in please give me your name and a link to your port like so Dan K https://www.modelmayhem.com/2297449 Who's first? (Raises hand) Oooooooooooo Dan can I play? say yes, say yes.. sweeet...
Model
retiredanddeleted
Posts: 3561
Azul, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Can I be on that list ?
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Sophistocles wrote: That pickup like has worked before. Trufax. As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people. BS ,mine is the definitive list. It is what it is. Everyone else's would just be opinion.
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Garry k wrote: I am pretty rank do me What saves you from a lower ranking is your models. I got to say every time I look at your port I want to think this is your trolling account and you have another amazing port using the same models. AS a tough love thing I got to ask are you trying at all? Did getting access to models from doing Vancouver fashion week swell your head and made you think you no longer needed to improve? I don't know why but it pisses me off to see those models wasted. There is another on my other thread who seems to be in the same boat as you. The waste is a tragedy.
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
A M U L wrote: Couldn't Egle been ranked a little higher, I'm making that assumption based upon her avi/ She probably would be with better photos.
Model
Jessie Shannon
Posts: 2004
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Sophistocles wrote: That pickup like has worked before. Trufax. As an aside, this ranking is fascinating, as, more than anything else, it gives a great insight into Dan's tastes. I'd love to see a few others do this and rank people. I would be willing to rank people but then there would be too many lists going at the same time?
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Jessie Shannon wrote: I would be willing to rank people but then there would be too many lists going at the same time? If people didn't like the way you ranked them you could tell them to just kiss your avatar! edit: LoL, while I was typing this you changed it from the butt pic!
Model
Jessie Shannon
Posts: 2004
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
K E E L I N G wrote: If people didn't like the way you ranked them you could tell them to just kiss your avatar! edit: LoL, while I was typing this you changed it from the butt pic! LOL I have avi add
Model
MelissaAnn
Posts: 3971
Seattle, Washington, US
Wow, thanks Dan!
Photographer
Dan K Photography
Posts: 5581
STATEN ISLAND, New York, US
Vincente Lopez wrote: (Raises hand) Oooooooooooo Dan can I play? say yes, say yes.. sweeet... Didn't see you coming. ...
|