Forums > General Industry > Innocence Lost

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Preface: I'd like to hear mainly from some of the larger players here. Those that don't bat an eye at the pressure of say, a six figure job or delivering a bazillion pages of editorial to a publication that circulates 300,000. Not that I don't value everyones opinion; I'm just looking for a very far removed viewpoint.
~~~~~~

Recently there was a post that took a brief, but related, detour.
https://www.modelmayhem.com/p.php?thread_id=206230
Two notable and established veterans. Mr. Randall and Mr. Eastwood had an info exchange on file archiving and management. It was scary shit and made Mr. Randall's penis shrivel. (his words.)

  At one point, Mr. Eastwood remarked
"And all I want to do is get back to the days where I just took a camera and ran out with a girl and shot some stuff at the park or local college campus and did not know what I was doing or that I was not suppose to be doing it there let alone without 14 lights and 3 people to hold them."

This made me pause for a long time. I think that most of us got into photography because we were attracted to the magic, this amazing thing that records what and how we see, and then we can show it to others. Hopefully that phase lasts forever where we jump up and down showing someone a new image screaming like a little kid in a sandbox. Like the little kid in a sandbox, everything is perfect; nothing was ever done "the wrong way. It was ALWAYS perfectly the way it should be. I don't think any of us thought "Yeah! I can't wait for the day that I burn through 5 TB's a month and struggle to stay on top of copyright law!"

  There's no doubt that the successful photographers that have managed to grow their business to several employees and dollar numbers I can't imagine must feel the grind sometimes. But how has all that growth changed how they shoot? Are the same subjects still fascinating? Is the simple magic of fresh vision jaded by time, business pressures and keeping up with the Joneses? Is what was once interesting no longer so, not through the natural evolution of life experience but through the unnatural production of vision, like the way a musician might stand too close to the amps for too long and become a touch hard of hearing?

Let fly.

Nov 07 07 09:57 pm Link

Photographer

ward

Posts: 6142

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I remember the moment I got into photography initially. I was attending community college, getting a bachelor or arts in journalism, after attending university. I was required to take a short semester in photojournalism for journalism. It was basic: here's your camera; here's your film; here's how you develop said film; and here's how you make a print. And, voila ! I was hooked.

I knew in that instant coming from the darkroom for the first time, that I had been given a gift: a natural inclination for taking a good photograph. Good angles. Good in-camera cropping. In black and white, nonetheless. Like my mother before me. With her brownie camera, which she still has. I'd like to think I inherited her 'vision' in black and white. Ironically, I dream in black and white. I've only ever dreamed in color once in my life that I recall. Perhaps even, I inherited some of her creativity and ability to technically master the little black box, without any 'formal' training.

I'd like to think even more then that, that I inherited her 'passion' for photography.

I'm very passionate about it. And yet even in the digital age, I love a great black and white image taken in broad daylight or under a semi-cloudy or overcast sky.

One light will do. I don't require 14 lights, in fact, I prefer just one, 90% of the time. Afterall, there is only one sun.

So, to reflect back on the OP's original statement: I still love to run outside in light of day, camera in hand, model in tow, and shoot. No lights. No reflectors. Digital or film. It doesn't matter. Just to shoot. Cause that's the one thing in life I'm most passionate about.

Gigabytes and terrabytes to hell.

Let's make great art ! Even with your old polaroid...or Brownie.

smile

~ ward ~

Nov 07 07 10:16 pm Link

Wardrobe Stylist

stylist man

Posts: 34382

New York, New York, US

I am busy so nothing of value to say tonight but a great topic and question.

I know Chip to be humble so I think it is okay to post this,

His avatar currently is interesting considering the topic.
Almost fortelling like in some weird Greek Tragedy.

https://modelmayhm-3.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/071105/13/472f5d80977be_m.jpg

Not a critique,
I am not making one nor should you on the photo.

I do think it tells of what is happening to the industry.

Me, I chose to hang out and not battle for the top unless elected in a brokered convention.

(can most of you understand me,
No.
Do I care?
No.
Maybe that is part of my point.)

Nov 07 07 10:58 pm Link

Photographer

A Traveler

Posts: 5506

San Francisco, California, US

I think in any profession it can be easy to lose sight of the original vision - the orignal excitement.

A large percentage of the paid work is quite mundane and relatively unexciting. I enjoy shooting, no matter what I am shooting, but without a doubt the most fun I have is shooting when I am able to do exactly what Stephen said he wanted to do - run around and shoot with no cares.

This thread ties in a bit with my previous thread on Vision & inspiration (https://modelmayhem.com/p.php?thread_id=155848)

I think at some point we all go through stages where we miss the simplicity of not having to worry about corporate drama, licensing, and negotiating with clients.

But all it takes to reignite the magic is some good old running around in fields with a camera & a model. Even though in my previous thread I wrote about finding your vision for each shoot and not relying on equipment, I find even myself letting my equipment do the shooting from time to time. It's so easy to get into a rhythm - we find a way that works, and we tend to stick with it, rather than experiment. When big money is on the line, experimentation may get put on the backburner.

On a shoot I did yesterday, I had issues with my pack. Uh oh...no strobes. In retrospect, I am thrilled I didn't have any lighting - back to basics. Nothing but a camera (and 13gb of CF cards). (And model, stylist, and hair and makeup)

I think the images below illustrate the point that it doesn't take a 14 light set up to create quality work. To answer your question "Is what was once interesting no longer not so, not through the natural evolution of life experience but through the unnatural production of vision"....I think that what was interesting is indeed still interesting - it is just often more difficult to find what is interesting when our lives become filled with a great deal of uninteresting elements. I think everyone shooting professionally would do themselves a great service to occasionally ditch the 100 pounds of equipment and just go out and shoot for the fun of it. smile

https://www.coutureimagery.com/images/MM/s507V0485.jpg

https://www.coutureimagery.com/images/MM/s507V0490.jpg

Nov 07 07 11:15 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Thanks Ward, M.hana and Nick.

Nov 07 07 11:25 pm Link

Model

MYS Britt

Posts: 10720

San Diego, California, US

Hey there Chip! I send you snuggles. May you have 6 figure jobs galore.
wink

BRITT

Nov 07 07 11:27 pm Link

Photographer

Emeritus

Posts: 22000

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I'm retired.  Have been for a while now.  Even before I retired, I kind of did, because I would only take jobs that I wanted to do for their own sake.

Now, with very limited shoot budgets, I do pretty much exactly what Stephen describes.  I run around to wherever there is a pretty girl or an interesting location, or a fun event, and shoot whatever presents itself.  I don't worry about meeting any particular style or criterion.  I just have fun with a camera.

That's the way it was for me 40 years ago, and the way it is again.  All that other stuff is just details in between.

Nov 07 07 11:43 pm Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

Chip Morton wrote:
Preface: I'd like to hear mainly from some of the larger players here. Those that don't bat an eye at the pressure of say, a six figure job or delivering a bazillion pages of editorial to a publication that circulates 300,000. Not that I don't value everyones opinion; I'm just looking for a very far removed viewpoint.
~~~~~~

Recently there was a post that took a brief, but related, detour.
https://www.modelmayhem.com/p.php?thread_id=206230
Two notable and established veterans. Mr. Randall and Mr. Eastwood had an info exchange on file archiving and management. It was scary shit and made Mr. Randall's penis shrivel. (his words.)

  At one point, Mr. Eastwood remarked
"And all I want to do is get back to the days where I just took a camera and ran out with a girl and shot some stuff at the park or local college campus and did not know what I was doing or that I was not suppose to be doing it there let alone without 14 lights and 3 people to hold them."

This made me pause for a long time. I think that most of us got into photography because we were attracted to the magic, this amazing thing that records what and how we see, and then we can show it to others. Hopefully that phase lasts forever where we jump up and down showing someone a new image screaming like a little kid in a sandbox. Like the little kid in a sandbox, everything is perfect; nothing was ever done "the wrong way. It was ALWAYS perfectly the way it should be. I don't think any of us thought "Yeah! I can't wait for the day that I burn through 5 TB's a month and struggle to stay on top of copyright law!"

  There's no doubt that the successful photographers that have managed to grow their business to several employees and dollar numbers I can't imagine must feel the grind sometimes. But how has all that growth changed how they shoot? Are the same subjects still fascinating? Is the simple magic of fresh vision jaded by time, business pressures and keeping up with the Joneses? Is what was once interesting no longer not so, not through the natural evolution of life experience but through the unnatural production of vision, like the way a musician might stand too close to the amps for too long and become a touch hard of hearing?

Let fly.

I do not want to comment on this yet, I would rather see where it goes from others perspectives, but I would like to point out and clarify what was meant in from where those sentiments came.

I have not lost the excitement or vision of shooting, I have built (right or wrong, mental or real) a self imposed prison of sorts.  I want to shoot like always, but before I found someone and asked she said yes and we went and shot something nice, we liked it many others did as well, and all was good.  Today I look at those and realize they were not my best but thats not really important here.  Today I see someone and I ask to shoot and they see my work and immediately there is an expectation of something.  I do not want to say quality because that is in the eye of the beholder, but rather just an expectation.  I now am limited (self imposed perhaps or actually likely) to deliver within that expectation, so I cannot do just anything, instead I do what I know will work and work well, for it should not just be as good as my previous work, but it should somehow have improved upon it. so I am limited and I do what I know and maybe try a little variation here and there, but I do not just run free like I once did before I knew a better way, before the girl expected a certain result, before those around me expect something with a certain quality and character that is associated with me or my so called style. 

Best example I have to explain what I mean, I one saw a great spread in a european mag, I knew I was one of the first to have it here so it was not seen yet, in it were some shots totally not my style, grainy, slight motion blur, B&W over contrasted and not well retouched, not badly retouched, but imperfections were left in.  I took the spread and sent it over to my rep,  while on the phone he opened the email and started telling me how great these were and asked "where did I see them?"  to which I quickly replied "Oh I shot it this weekend...."  to which he immediately said "ohhh  what happened?"  I said "what do you mean?"  Already anticipating this response as it would quite possibly have been my own, his explanation is it did not meet the usual standard and he figured something was bothering me.  The same images he was praising a moment ago, he even went so far as to point out things I did not do in post that should have been done (as per MY norm) and mentioned what made me use film or that over done grain effect.  After a few seconds I said its not mine in my typical sarcastic NY tone to which he immediately laughed saying oh you had me going there, glad to hear your OK (obviously afraid that a money maker may have been washed up overnight on him) so I said hey they were from the new Italian vogue and mentioned the very famous shooter to which they were again a delight to view! wonderful and full of flair..........  at least to him, I no longer found them as enjoyable as I once thought them to be. 

But those of you who get that will get it, those who don't maybe someone else can explain it, I am sadly tired of doing so not because of the explanation but because of the thought I harbor that even though it is my own limitation and I am aware of it I also know I will not likely overcome it even with another telling me I should, even if I tell them they should, tell me, I should.

I have even gone so far as to set up another name to use with pictures that I did take but are not images I would have used rather they were rejects from a shoot, only to perhaps be free of that insane "Expectation" I have most likely self imposed and feel fearful to fall short of. 

I have yet to ever actually go through with it.  I figure it will backfire because once I show up they will likely know its me or somehow it will get connected and so what would be the point?  so I don't bother.  Maybe one day I will be in fiji and shoot a native that has no expectation of anything.  Or maybe I will be in NY and just stop caring.... Hopefully it will be of what others may think and not of taking a picture I like. 

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com


OK.... so I typed a bit more than planned, but I still did not type my answer to the original post but rather added some additional information which lead partly to the statement above.  I should be sleeping.

Nov 08 07 12:21 am Link

Photographer

foxfire images

Posts: 977

Northfield, Vermont, US

i would not want to do this for money

Nov 08 07 12:33 am Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

that seems far more melancholy than it was actually meant,  I am not depressed over this, its more like frustration with my own limits and an inablity or unwillingness to just "get over it"  that frustrates me.  Partially because I do not really consider myself an artist, more a commercial realist who happens to currently have a talent to produce images that enough people feel are valuable enough to pay enough for to make me very comfortable and busy.  I see real artists and wish I had some of what they have, and I see real artists, and am thankful I don't have some of what they have, some are really tortured souls.

I am a Capitalist!  and if the business changed and said my style should with it, I would, for now its OK and I happen to be very lucky that I get to do something I typically enjoy and get paid well for it.  Its hard to complain (well not for a New Yorker) but I know its hard to have sympathy for anyone who does what I do and gets paid!  I sure wouldn't smile

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Nov 08 07 12:39 am Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

michael george wrote:
i would not want to do this for money

Then you have to raise your rates!   

I did, and eventually my thoughts on the subject changed   smile

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Nov 08 07 12:41 am Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Awesome insight, Stephen. Thanks for that!

Nov 08 07 12:42 am Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

Chip Morton wrote:
Awesome insight, Stephen. Thanks for that!

hey no problem I give rate advice on wednesdays! 

Just kidding.  That NY sarcasm gene won't let go,  plus I don't want to leave that depressing post above as my late night comment.  OK, so maybe its only depressing to me...whatever!

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Nov 08 07 12:45 am Link

Photographer

Mark J. Sebastian

Posts: 1530

San Francisco, California, US

I did a shoot recently in which I had 2 models, a MUA, a Gaffer and an Assistant Director, myself and the client.

Its fun working with a great team and the quality of the photos are much higher. But I think I'll continue to preserve the rawness of my solo stuff.

I don't think either route is better than the other. Its just different.

Nov 08 07 12:46 am Link

Photographer

Mark J. Sebastian

Posts: 1530

San Francisco, California, US

P.S. I'm not nearly as high-up the ladder as people seem to think I am. But I can see where the next level of photography would drive me, and so I've ben pondering a lot of the issues mentioned above.

Nov 08 07 12:53 am Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

M Sebastian wrote:
P.S. I'm not nearly as high-up the ladder as people seem to think I am. But I can see where the next level of photography would drive me, and so I've ben pondering a lot of the issues mentioned above.

At times it is possible to establish a style that allows for anything to go, usually it requires a rich someone who is related or a special someone who you have befriended that is in a position to make it be in VOGUE so to speak.  I would probably envy those that can have a style that allows for them to do whatever without a care in the world.

I do not however, believe that just cause they are famous everything they do is some amazing piece of art!  sometimes it crap! just many are afraid to say, and actually saying it should not diminish the fact that the same person can again create great art, society should be more confident in themselves to say what they feel instead of say what they think they should feel because of who or what they are saying it about may represent.

A piece of crap placed in a world renowned museum will most likely gather some amazing acknowledgments from those who would harshly critique an unknown.  Thus we have ART!

Just make sure your not dependant on the industry when you make a stand against one who has many friends in high places.  wink

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Nov 08 07 01:06 am Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

By the way  M Sebastian, I am loving that avitar! 

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Nov 08 07 01:08 am Link

Photographer

- Phil H -

Posts: 26552

Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom

StephenEastwood wrote:

I do not want to comment on this yet, I would rather see where it goes from others perspectives, but I would like to point out and clarify what was meant in from where those sentiments came.

I have not lost the excitement or vision of shooting, I have built (right or wrong, mental or real) a self imposed prison of sorts.  I want to shoot like always, but before I found someone and asked she said yes and we went and shot something nice, we liked it many others did as well, and all was good.  Today I look at those and realize they were not my best but thats not really important here.  Today I see someone and I ask to shoot and they see my work and immediately there is an expectation of something.  I do not want to say quality because that is in the eye of the beholder, but rather just an expectation.  I now am limited (self imposed perhaps or actually likely) to deliver within that expectation, so I cannot do just anything, instead I do what I know will work and work well, for it should not just be as good as my previous work, but it should somehow have improved upon it. so I am limited and I do what I know and maybe try a little variation here and there, but I do not just run free like I once did before I knew a better way, before the girl expected a certain result, before those around me expect something with a certain quality and character that is associated with me or my so called style. 

Best example I have to explain what I mean, I one saw a great spread in a european mag, I knew I was one of the first to have it here so it was not seen yet, in it were some shots totally not my style, grainy, slight motion blur, B&W over contrasted and not well retouched, not badly retouched, but imperfections were left in.  I took the spread and sent it over to my rep,  while on the phone he opened the email and started telling me how great these were and asked "where did I see them?"  to which I quickly replied "Oh I shot it this weekend...."  to which he immediately said "ohhh  what happened?"  I said "what do you mean?"  Already anticipating this response as it would quite possibly have been my own, his explanation is it did not meet the usual standard and he figured something was bothering me.  The same images he was praising a moment ago, he even went so far as to point out things I did not do in post that should have been done (as per MY norm) and mentioned what made me use film or that over done grain effect.  After a few seconds I said its not mine in my typical sarcastic NY tone to which he immediately laughed saying oh you had me going there, glad to hear your OK (obviously afraid that a money maker may have been washed up overnight on him) so I said hey they were from the new Italian vogue and mentioned the very famous shooter to which they were again a delight to view! wonderful and full of flair..........  at least to him, I no longer found them as enjoyable as I once thought them to be. 

But those of you who get that will get it, those who don't maybe someone else can explain it, I am sadly tired of doing so not because of the explanation but because of the thought I harbor that even though it is my own limitation and I am aware of it I also know I will not likely overcome it even with another telling me I should, even if I tell them they should, tell me, I should.

I have even gone so far as to set up another name to use with pictures that I did take but are not images I would have used rather they were rejects from a shoot, only to perhaps be free of that insane "Expectation" I have most likely self imposed and feel fearful to fall short of. 

I have yet to ever actually go through with it.  I figure it will backfire because once I show up they will likely know its me or somehow it will get connected and so what would be the point?  so I don't bother.  Maybe one day I will be in fiji and shoot a native that has no expectation of anything.  Or maybe I will be in NY and just stop caring.... Hopefully it will be of what others may think and not of taking a picture I like. 

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com


OK.... so I typed a bit more than planned, but I still did not type my answer to the original post but rather added some additional information which lead partly to the statement above.  I should be sleeping.

Thanks for posting this, your words are going to touch a lot of people over the coming weeks smile
PH

Nov 08 07 01:47 am Link

Photographer

Webspinner Studios

Posts: 6964

Ann Arbor, Michigan, US

I am an obsessive art photographer. I like it that way.

Nov 08 07 01:57 am Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Chip Morton wrote:
Preface: I'd like to hear mainly from some of the larger players here. Those that don't bat an eye at the pressure of say, a six figure job or delivering a bazillion pages of editorial to a publication that circulates 300,000. Not that I don't value everyones opinion; I'm just looking for a very far removed viewpoint.
~~~~~~

Nov 08 07 02:12 am Link

Photographer

Tropic Light

Posts: 7595

Kailua, Hawaii, US

Good thread.

Nov 08 07 02:50 am Link

Photographer

GAETANO CATELLI STUDIOS

Posts: 9669

Oxford, Mississippi, US

the more money that's only the line, the more control the money people have -- in any business, not just photography.

but, professional photography isn't just business -- it's show business.  and show business is a funny business.  it's like the old joke:  how many directors does it ake to change a light bulb?  i don't know -- what do you think? 

in other words, there's no cookbook formula in show business.  so, because no one is really an expert, everyone tries to be one.  that can be a real headache for someone who has a personal vision.

a delicate balance is required.  if the money people have too much control, they'll never take a chance on something that doesn't fit the template that's worked before.  eventually, the audience stops looking at what's showing.  on the other hand, if a "creative genius" gets too much control over too big a project, what often results is a self-indulgent incomprehensible mess.  and, the audience doesn't bother to look at all.

so, yeah, a 6-figure campaign is not going to allow for the kind of spontaneity you enjoyed when you were still shooting your first hundred rolls of film.

Nov 08 07 03:12 am Link

Photographer

- Phil H -

Posts: 26552

Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom

*bump*

Nov 08 07 08:43 am Link

Photographer

rrbimaging

Posts: 50

Buckley, Washington, US

StephenEastwood wrote:
At times it is possible to establish a style that allows for anything to go, usually it requires a rich someone who is related or a special someone who you have befriended that is in a position to make it be in VOGUE so to speak.  I would probably envy those that can have a style that allows for them to do whatever without a care in the world.

I do not however, believe that just cause they are famous everything they do is some amazing piece of art!  sometimes it crap! just many are afraid to say, and actually saying it should not diminish the fact that the same person can again create great art, society should be more confident in themselves to say what they feel instead of say what they think they should feel because of who or what they are saying it about may represent.

A piece of crap placed in a world renowned museum will most likely gather some amazing acknowledgments from those who would harshly critique an unknown.  Thus we have ART!

Just make sure your not dependant on the industry when you make a stand against one who has many friends in high places.  wink

Stephen Eastwood
http://www.StephenEastwood.com

Wonderful insights Stephen!! So concisely stated... Bravo!!

Nov 08 07 09:09 am Link

Makeup Artist

G_Makeup

Posts: 243

New York, New York, US

This thread should not disappear so quickly. 

G

Nov 08 07 07:22 pm Link

Photographer

Malloch

Posts: 2566

Hastings, England, United Kingdom

After many years in photography, most of it on the mundane commercial work that paid the rent and gave me a decent living, I was also able to do work that did excite. Because of that I have never really lost the original buzz I got from the subject.
Now that I am semi-retired and now pick and choose the work I do for clients I can honestly say that the excitment is still there. I no longer have to consider the money side of the business as paramount.
It was because of good business practice and sound financial planning that has left me free to work in the way I now do. No matter what level of photography one works in, if it is a passion rather than just a job, then the excitment should always remain in the forefront.

Nov 08 07 07:39 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

Thanks, Malloch. Thanks, Sebastian.

Nov 08 07 08:48 pm Link

Makeup Artist

G_Makeup

Posts: 243

New York, New York, US

It really saddens me that this thread has so few responses from people in the industry even if only to say hey not me I still have zest for it, amazing how the only threads that get responses in the hundreds are BS crap!   Explains why I generally avoid reading through, when you do find something that may have a real thought behind it, it gets nowhere. 

G

Nov 09 07 08:22 pm Link

Photographer

BYS

Posts: 11614

Paris, Île-de-France, France

payed works pay the bills,the personal work ,a lot of freetime
even if the are usually the most frustrating in creativity they are also exciting challanges
anyway i don't like to work and there is not so many job where it's so much fun
in fact i feel like i never work
so i enjoy both and one side feed the other
tb

Nov 09 07 08:30 pm Link

Photographer

OLJ studio

Posts: 1550

Winnetka, California, US

H Newton mentioned in his Autobiography that during every project he dedicated some time to make pictures that weren’t supposed to meet expectations. They got rejected and he could keep them for his personal portfolio. As he put it, this was his way to play the system and use best models and stylists for his personal experiments

Nov 12 07 01:39 am Link

Photographer

JenniferMaria

Posts: 1780

Miami Beach, Florida, US

well, i'm glad to read from seasoned professionals. i'm still climbing my ladder, so i don't have any advice about what it's like at the top. i can only look back at the few stones i've hopped thus far in my little pond and look at the ones who've made it & hope they post here. smile

Dec 03 07 02:33 pm Link

Photographer

Lee K

Posts: 2411

Palatine, Illinois, US

ward wrote:
One light will do. I don't require 14 lights, in fact, I prefer just one, 90% of the time. Afterall, there is only one sun.

I agree.

Dec 03 07 04:56 pm Link

Photographer

Fotografia-di-Asia

Posts: 6118

Park City, Utah, US

I still do it the easy way because I enjoy it. Some people are starting to make things difficult for me. I am staying away from those people. smile

Dec 03 07 06:15 pm Link

Photographer

Profile Closed

Posts: 5808

Niceville, Florida, US

Outstanding thread. I'm still a student so I'll keep my Sophomore mouth shut and all but I understand it when you said you were hooked and had a gift for angles.

I'm contemplating dropping out of school altogether.

Dec 03 07 06:20 pm Link

Photographer

GCobb Photography

Posts: 15898

Southaven, Mississippi, US

Mr Eastwood shares words of wisdom for sure, just as he did with me in a PM.  It was a short paragraph and a definite eye-opener, objective and factual.

I'm on the outer edge of magazines and mid-range business, just not there yet.  I still have fun where I am.  But I think I could have fun if I were up the proverbial ladder too.  I just don't know if I'll ever get there.  So I'll continue to walk downtown with my camera and flash, going to concerts to shoot and not being able to make the money I wish I could make.

Maybe some day...

Dec 03 07 06:31 pm Link

Model

Iona Lynn

Posts: 11176

Oakland, California, US

Tiptoes in....

What do we do when it seems that we spend more time on paperwork taxes, bank trips, calling clients, planning trips, answering emails,  booking clients, meetings, and all that shit than doing what we love...

(being the nekked girl on campus)

Dec 03 07 07:04 pm Link

Clothing Designer

nothing

Posts: 9229

Okinawa, Okinawa, Japan

maybe this is why I am hesitant about going pro.

I love wandering out in the middle of nowhere, with only a camera in a backpack, and maybe a "model/person", no plan, no expectations... just winging it.

I don't want to let go of that.

Dec 04 07 03:40 am Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

BYS, Leo, Iona et. al.  Thanks.

Shiggily, I know what you mean.

(Morton patiently waits for Pixel Fisher and B. Randall, among others.)

Nick Zantop wrote:
But all it takes to reignite the magic is some good old running around in fields with a camera & a model.

Excellent!

OLJ studio wrote:
H Newton mentioned in his Autobiography that during every project he dedicated some time to make pictures that weren’t supposed to meet expectations. They got rejected and he could keep them for his personal portfolio. As he put it, this was his way to play the system and use best models and stylists for his personal experiments

Good to know!

Dec 04 07 10:04 am Link

Photographer

Timo G

Posts: 106

Carlsbad, California, US

Hey guys - First off.  Chip is your Mom's name Jane?  I think I know her from back in the prepress game.  If it is I hope she is well.  One of my favorite coworkers in that industry and a great lady!

I've been banging away in this industry about 15 years or so.  Came in with wide eyed excitement after being a serious amateur for years.  Started in the prepress industry and eventually worked into doing commercial photography with the advent of high end digital capture in '95ish.  All that being said, Not sure if I have any of that wide eyed excitement anymore.  My career is different than most on MM I think.  Most of my days are spend banging out product shots of shoes, clothes, glasses, medical parts, golf clubs.......from 6AM until 6PM many times 7 days a week for 6 to 8 week stretches.  Once they are shot I have to figure out how to get shots press ready as well.  I make great money but it is a bit of a grind.  I don't think I know how to take a shot without at least 5 lights any more (7 - 9 lights feels more comfortable).  My advocation has become a vocation.  It has been a good run but much of the magic is gone. 

Which brings me to Model Mayhem.  I enjoy making images of models, if nothing else for fun.  I don't have to sell them, they can look like I want (not the art director or marketing person) and the models/MUAs/Hair people seem really appreciative of some decent quality images. I will continue to test a few times a year as a creative outlet.  It has brought some spark back into my shooting and some fun.  Looking forward to doing a couple more test the first part of next year.

I still don't think I am ready to revert to "go grab a camera and a model and just head out and see what we get."  (Who would carry my 9 lights?????)  Have fun with it guys!

Tim

Dec 04 07 10:42 am Link

Photographer

Timo G

Posts: 106

Carlsbad, California, US

man, am I a buzz kill - Was looking forward to keeping this going - BUMP.

Dec 04 07 11:49 am Link