Forums > General Industry > 17 = trouble?? WTF!!

Model

V A L F

Posts: 2374

Máncora, Piura, Peru

most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

Jun 07 08 06:35 pm Link

Photographer

The Silencing Machine

Posts: 15759

South Amboy, New Jersey, US

I was under the impression that models started off in their early teens.  Makes sense if most also retire pretty young.

Jun 07 08 06:38 pm Link

Photographer

AB-11

Posts: 273

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Valeria,

Here in the US they are a lot of right-winged double-minded folks that will raise hell from anything involving minors + cameras...

Long live the 'Free World'!!

Jun 07 08 06:39 pm Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

Peru is probably less Puritanical than the US.

Jun 07 08 06:39 pm Link

Photographer

Darren Wellhoefer

Posts: 992

Newport Beach, California, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

because in Sensible-Land, its not an issue, but in America, home of the Sue'ers, its an issue.

if you lived in America, someone would sue you for starting a new 17-thread.

~dw

Jun 07 08 06:42 pm Link

Photographer

photosbydmp

Posts: 3808

Shepparton-Mooroopna, Victoria, Australia

AB-11 wrote:
Valeria,

Here in the US they are a lot of right-winged double-minded folks that will raise hell from anything involving minors + cameras...

Long live the 'Free World'!!

and its exactly the same downunder, do not even mention 17 and a camera in the same sentence.

Jun 07 08 06:43 pm Link

Model

Playthings

Posts: 912

Montreal, Wisconsin, US

The problem in this world is that people tend to stupidely think that a 17 y/o is a child and an 18 y/o is instantly a grown-up.It's BEYOND stupid(I mean,extreme stupid,sorry)to think that a number can apply to everyone,everything,every f'n situation.It just really makes me angry.All these statistics are a GENERALITY.It's true that a very lot of people under 18 are not yet ready to face the sexual-centered world we live in,they cannot understand it.It's also true that there are 30 y/o people who don't understand it better than them.And there are also those who are underage and know way much more.There may be a lot,there may be a few,or so few that almost unrecognizable,but it doesn't make it disappear.You can't judge this like this,no way.Every situation must be handled differently.But of course,people are way too courageous to take risks.That's why this world never changes.Ugh

Jun 07 08 06:43 pm Link

Model

V A L F

Posts: 2374

Máncora, Piura, Peru

ive seen many US underage models in websites, and they are pretty professional and most of them better than older models.

Jun 07 08 06:43 pm Link

Photographer

Womack Photo KCMO

Posts: 2348

Kansas City, Kansas, US

AB-11 wrote:
Valeria,

Here in the US they are a lot of right-winged double-minded folks that will raise hell from anything involving minors + cameras...

Long live the 'Free World'!!

Don't you dare blame the right. This has NOTHING to do with that. Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!

Jun 07 08 06:45 pm Link

Model

Playthings

Posts: 912

Montreal, Wisconsin, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
ive seen many US underage models in websites, and they are pretty professional and most of them better than older models.

It's not even about being good or not,it's about knowing what you're doing.

Jun 07 08 06:47 pm Link

Photographer

AB-11

Posts: 273

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Womack Photo wrote:
(...) Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!

Sorry, I forgot this was your house.

Jun 07 08 06:49 pm Link

Photographer

Gil Lang

Posts: 4655

Isla Vista, California, US

It's sad to say but,I came across a few 17 years models in my area here at MM and...won't contact them to set a shoot.Don't want to have to deal with that.

Jun 07 08 06:49 pm Link

Photographer

Yves Duchamp - Femme

Posts: 24436

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

Womack Photo wrote:

Don't you dare blame the right. This has NOTHING to do with that. Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!

Holy shit.

Don't have a stroke, dude.

Jun 07 08 06:50 pm Link

Photographer

Yves Duchamp - Femme

Posts: 24436

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

Darren Wellhoefer wrote:

because in Sensible-Land, its not an issue, but in America, home of the Sue'ers, its an issue.

if you lived in America, someone would sue you for starting a new 17-thread.

~dw

Pretty much.

Jun 07 08 06:51 pm Link

Photographer

Visions by Dan

Posts: 928

Bullard, Texas, US

Womack Photo wrote:

Don't you dare blame the right. This has NOTHING to do with that. Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!

Don't get out much do ya?

Jun 07 08 06:52 pm Link

Model

Vasilisa

Posts: 803

London, Arkansas, US

I don't think it's necessarily the photographer's point of view, rather the desire to avoid trouble. Idiot puritanical zealot + 17yo in a photograph = youth being perverted = paedo photographer. You can't say that it isn't a possible scenario.

Jun 07 08 06:52 pm Link

Model

Vasilisa

Posts: 803

London, Arkansas, US

I don't think it's necessarily the photographer's point of view, rather the desire to avoid trouble. Idiot puritanical zealot + 17yo in a photograph = youth being perverted = paedo photographer. You can't say that it isn't a possible scenario.

Jun 07 08 06:52 pm Link

Photographer

Greg Kolack

Posts: 18392

Elmhurst, Illinois, US

AB-11 wrote:
Valeria,

Here in the US they are a lot of right-winged double-minded folks that will raise hell from anything involving minors + cameras...

Long live the 'Free World'!!

Womack Photo wrote:
Don't you dare blame the right. This has NOTHING to do with that. Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!

Or what? What are you going to do?

Well, just for that, I am going to blame the right.

Now what?

And in this corner...

Jun 07 08 07:07 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Womack Photo wrote:

Don't you dare blame the right. This has NOTHING to do with that. Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!

Are you getting treatment for delusionary hysteria?

Jun 07 08 07:08 pm Link

Photographer

Paul Brecht

Posts: 12232

Colton, California, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

Val,

I told you a while back, if you ever come over here, I'll shoot you... 

Paul

Jun 07 08 07:09 pm Link

Model

Zoe SS

Posts: 263

Atlanta, Georgia, US

I have a serious problem with this. It's just really irritating.

Jun 07 08 07:11 pm Link

Photographer

RJ Ohrstedt

Posts: 546

Columbus, Ohio, US

I've shot a number of under 18 models; the key, I think, was their parent's signature on the release and a parent's presence at the shoot.

Edit: My avatar, for one

Jun 07 08 07:12 pm Link

Photographer

Paul Brecht

Posts: 12232

Colton, California, US

& we can go check out some VH...  smile...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIr-WBZT1MI

Paul

Jun 07 08 07:13 pm Link

Photographer

JA Sanchez

Posts: 6830

Miami, Florida, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

Actually it is legal to shoot a minor totally nude, even in the puritanical US.

Jun 07 08 07:14 pm Link

Photographer

pullins photography

Posts: 5884

Troy, Michigan, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

it's not "illegal" they just can't contract for themselves, so they need either a parent, or whomever their parent designates as a surrogate to sign on their behalf, like an agent or attorney

Jun 07 08 07:15 pm Link

Photographer

Yves Duchamp - Femme

Posts: 24436

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

SouthFLpix wrote:

Actually it is legal to shoot a minor totally nude, even in the puritanical US.

QFT

Jun 07 08 07:15 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Oh hell.....I can see the posse's gathering now....

Jun 07 08 07:15 pm Link

Model

CLAYMAC

Posts: 9187

BOISE, Idaho, US

AlexandraZoe wrote:
I have a serious problem with this. It's just really irritating.

Agreed. This is what I got the other day: "Since so many photographers ran into problems as in "minors" issues. I cannot take your pictures at the moment. But please check back when you are of age. I think you have a great look to my port. Please don't forget to check back. Thanks, Talk to you soon."

Ugh.

Jun 07 08 07:15 pm Link

Model

Chloe Kirk

Posts: 59

London, England, United Kingdom

age is really a restriction for people like me
everyone tells you to send them a message when your 18

Jun 07 08 07:21 pm Link

Photographer

RJ Ohrstedt

Posts: 546

Columbus, Ohio, US

Chloe Kirk wrote:
age is really a restriction for people like me
everyone tells you to send them a message when your 18

I'd gladly work with you; just need parental permission in the US. Too bad you're in the UK.

Jun 07 08 07:26 pm Link

Photographer

Adler Photographic

Posts: 473

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

It's not illegal to shoot a model who is 17, however, the underage/minor model cannot legally enter into an agreement or contract without a parent or guardian's consent. Agencies that represent minors either have the consent or power of attorney to enter into contracts and agreements.

Many photographers shy away from shooting minors for a variety of reasons, one of which many times is to avoid dealing with the extra layers of people surrounding a minor. this does not make them a "perv" as you state.

Over the years I have shot many minors for various projects with no issues or problems. I continue to do so with parents, guardians and representatives of some sort present. It creates a different working environment but I am luckily equipped to handle it. Some photographers do not have the facility to handle the additional bodies at a shoot and some have a hard time working with the distractions they bring.

Now as for "pervs" they come in all shapes, sizes, color and political persuasions, left, right or center. It is wise for an underage or minor to take extra care in vetting out who they work with.

Jun 07 08 07:27 pm Link

Photographer

DaveDavis

Posts: 21946

Manteca, California, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble

OMG!! Nothing can be further from the truth!! Google up some of the laws Photogs need to comply with when working with minors, Fully Clothed, of course!

Hey, I'm 110% all for making it easier to prosecute sexual predictors, but the new laws have really hurt the ligament modeling/photographer industry.

Jun 07 08 07:38 pm Link

Photographer

Michael R Kihn Studios

Posts: 2559

Erie, Pennsylvania, US

Under aged models never scared me because I'm not stupid with them

Jun 07 08 07:42 pm Link

Model

taylee belle

Posts: 62

Corona, California, US

Valeria Figallo wrote:
most starting models are 16 or 17 sometimes even younger, i dont know why everyone thinks its SO ILLEGAL to shoot a minor, in fact agencies prefer underage models now.

only a perv would think shooting a minor its trouble and illegal, of course, you cant shoot a minor totally nude, but a "shooting" can be fashion, beauty,etc etc etc...

agreed!

Jun 07 08 07:43 pm Link

Model

Sebastian Spades

Posts: 357

Enumclaw, Washington, US

RJ Ohrstedt wrote:
I've shot a number of under 18 models; the key, I think, was their parent's signature on the release and a parent's presence at the shoot.

Edit: My avatar, for one

yes! I started modeling for a family friend when I was 14. I fit the clothes his wife made and she wanted to start her own business. A couple friends modeled them as well as I did. a parent was present a the shoots even though they've known me since I was a baby, they requested their presence. Sadly he died right before I turned 15 and I stopped since I didn't have any modeling links. When I got back into modeling with some friends who went to photography classes and when I was 17 found out about here. I refused to not bring a parent along since I needed their signature anyway! I found out of personal experience the photographers were fine if a parent was there but if I brought a friend along they wouldn't shoot even if i got a signature.

Jun 07 08 07:47 pm Link

Model

Sarah LaVelle

Posts: 507

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, US

It's because they don't want to get in trouble. Even when a parent signs a release they can be like "I don't like that her butt is showing too much" or something and if it's not phrased a certain way in the release they can get in trouble.

Also many people find those under the age of 18 to be unprofessional. I know sometimes this is true (look at many 16 & 17 yo profiles... nothing but myspace pics looking for pretty photos to brag). Although it is also true about those over 18 but at least they don't need a parent to approve the photographer.

With the "perv" part, that's not always true. Many times yes, but do you really want to work with a GWC who only shoots girls in his garage anyway? I wouldn't think so. Anyone can avoid "pervs" or whatever, just learn to say "I don't like your work" but be nice about it. Other than that, like I had said, why would you even ask someone who does "perv" shots to work with them anyway?

In all, you now have run into the problem all of the wanting to be real model under-aged girls run into.. Just relax and realize that the real world is like this and make the best of it.

Good luck, if you have any questions or comments I won't be on this forum anymore so just send me a message.

Jun 07 08 07:48 pm Link

Model

Sebastian Spades

Posts: 357

Enumclaw, Washington, US

Chloe Kirk wrote:
age is really a restriction for people like me
everyone tells you to send them a message when your 18

I got one that said "talk to me when you're 20"
I drove 15 miles for the shoot and he said I forgot to ask how old you are (he found me on here!) I said "exactly what my profile says 18." and showed him my ID and he said to talk to him when I'm 20.

Jun 07 08 07:49 pm Link

Photographer

Dave - The Rollei Guy

Posts: 208

New York, New York, US

Don't you dare blame the right. This has NOTHING to do with that. Oh, and if you don't think you are free...MOVE!


One of the horrible things bringing this country to it's knees is such rediculous statements as the abve.
    In the country where we have the poorest education system in the western world, the only country in the western world where literacy is going down instead of up.  The most expensive medical care in the world and yet rated 42 in level of medical care.  Ranked 17 in level of engineering education.   I could go on and on.  Should we all move, or should we yell and scream and improve things.

Jun 07 08 07:51 pm Link

Photographer

Sergei Pyuro

Posts: 193

Los Angeles, California, US

I've seen older models ccopmplain when they see girls under 18 modeling. I don;t understand that! where were they when they were that age? I think they just don't like the prettier, younger models to take their work away!

Jun 07 08 07:52 pm Link

Model

Sebastian Spades

Posts: 357

Enumclaw, Washington, US

Sarah LaVelle wrote:
In all, you now have run into the problem all of the wanting to be real model under-aged girls run into.. Just relax and realize that the real world is like this and make the best of it.

I can completely respect photographers who do not want to or feel comfortable working with minors. What I can't respect are photographers who aren't comfortable and won't work with an underage model and then is blatantly rude about it. I don't have a personal example but a friend of mine from a while back recently said she was contacted by a photographer who wanted to work with her. when he found out she was 17 he said she wasted his time and wasn't worth the legal effort.
I thought that was rude and she could have been turned away in a much better way.

Jun 07 08 07:53 pm Link