Photographer
Jason Haven
Posts: 38381
Washington, District of Columbia, US
I have yet to use Facebook to schedule a shoot. I'm not even sure where to start. How does one find new models that way?
Photographer
Steve Arebalo
Posts: 2280
Orange, California, US
afplcc wrote: Two different purposes with some overlap. I shoot mostly art nudes--kind of hard to display that portfolio on FB. And given my age, I suspect that in a general community (like FB), me initiating contact with 20 year olds might come off as creepy (unless they're a fulltime model or already know me). I get that FB works really well for some photographers and models--that's great! MM is not a "one size fits all". Ed +1 My Great Niece who lived with us since she was 12, started using FB at 14. I feel uncomfortable contacting young women on FB. I am also aware that many of the girls amend their age to appear older than they are. Many underage teens like to flirt on FB and want to communicate with men over the age of 18. Most adult men avoid relationships with underage teens because of the possible legal ramifications. Although agencies may communicate via FB, my research indicates that many agencies frown on a FB portfolio. They expect a professional online and print portfolio. For a serious model and photographer, it is a highly competitive industry.
Photographer
Moore Photo Graphix
Posts: 5288
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Farenell Photography wrote: FB overtaking MM? I'm not so sure. I think it really depends on how you use it & market yourself & the kinds of stuff you're looking to shoot & ones geographic area. If anything kills MM's useful, it'll probably be how unreliable it is. You just never know when the site will be up or down or even when those dreaded 408(?) errors appear. Nor does it help that MM still has yet to develop a mobile phone app (after people literally clamoring this for years) that isn't linked to a 3rd party site. Another site will likely come along that will fill the void, leaving MM in the dust. Such is the way of these kinds of things. Here today, gone tomorrow. Saying Facebook is killing is like blaming Ken Block's latest Gymkhana video for the empty seats at last weekend's Nascar races in Indianapolis Motor Speedway. We're talking about 2 sites gear towards 2 different audiences. What works for one party doesn't always work for others. Hence the phrase, results may vary. Also, FB doesn't allow nudity on their site. Ask those who had images removed by FB. They're not most understanding. Finally, I been hearing people talk about (insert site here) was gonna replace MM. Fast forward to now, those so-called replacement sites haven't gotten off the ground, or they didn't get enough people to making joining them worthwhile.
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 12067
Grand Rapids, Michigan, US
P-Studios wrote: HALF THE MODELS ON MM OUR GONE MM NEEDS TO DO A CLEAN UP ON ANY ONE NOT USING THERE PAGE FOR OVER 9 MO Stephanie Fish wrote: When searching or browsing models, just click the Recent Activity link. It'll bring up models who are actually signing in. :-) And as for Facebook - its nice to have. But it's not MM. MM was created for us: photographers, models, stylists, retouchers. People in the business. Facebook was made was any joe schmo that has access to the Internet. I trust the people MM contains much more. It's more personal to me. When I do model searches, I only have it display people who have logged in in the last 14 days.
Photographer
WIP
Posts: 15973
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
MM is not a serious professional site if it were then a huge percentage of profiles would have to go and where would this leave IB ? drop in ranking which leads to loss of revenue. Bottom line IB bought the site to make money and all the extras are aimed not at members (even though it may seem like it) but to make the site more attractive to potential advertisers.
Photographer
ontherocks
Posts: 23575
Salem, Oregon, US
i am friends with some of my models on fbook (some have separate model profiles) but i've never gotten any work (paying or trade) directly from fbook. mostly it just gives me a glimpse into the lives of attractive young women (oh my). the forums do seem somewhat less active than they were a couple years ago.
Photographer
My Perfumed Alibi
Posts: 51
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Chris Rifkin wrote: Well,I would definitely say that FB is more reliable than MM as far as reliability and not crashing every day Ba-ZING!!LOL!
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Patchouli Nyx wrote: How do you do a geographic search for model qualities on FB? If you are networking properly on FB you already know they are there. And they are there in droves. If you just walk over to fb without putting in the networking time though, you most likely won't get anywhere. The owners manuals for MM and FB are drastically different. But as much as I love this place and grew up in it, FB is much more productive for me now. Much much more.
Photographer
My Perfumed Alibi
Posts: 51
Kansas City, Missouri, US
ASYLUM - Photo wrote: I have yet to use Facebook to schedule a shoot. I'm not even sure where to start. How does one find new llamas that way? Browse for llamas in your area here, then see if they have a FB profile listed. Once you find one, you'll find lots more!!
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
DougBPhoto wrote: Yeah, but we are still making those original contacts via MM and THEN we go to FB. FB isn't killing MM, professional networking on FB is the normal progression after finding people via MM and vetting them. Facebook isn't hurting MM, if anything FB makes it easier to communicate with contacts you make on MM, so the two are complementary, not competitive. I've found the opposite to be true. Girls begin modeling through FB and then find out about MM. When I do a browse on MM for my area I recognize pretty much every new model from FB.
Photographer
Mortonovich
Posts: 6209
San Diego, California, US
A R A G O N wrote: MM killed MM... Yup!!
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Just A Perfumed Alibi wrote: Browse for models in your area here, then see if they have a FB profile listed. Once you find one, you'll find lots more!! That's not very efficient, considering you are limiting yourself to only what's on MM. The idea behind casting on fb is to take advantage of how many more models are there. If you limit to only the one's you can cross reference here it's not taking advantage of FB's huge numbers.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
GRAF wrote: A few years ago, if I placed a casting call on MM I would get more responses than I could handle. Now when I post a casting I hear crickets. I posted recently for male models for a clothing line on MM and got a ton of responses, selected 3 for the shoot. Last week I had a casting call for female high fashion models and again, I had a ton of responses. Selected 3 models again, one new face that is signed with a good agency, one stunning high fashion model and the 3rd one is currently on the Bachelor show. I have no problems with MM and castings.
Photographer
OmnyRa
Posts: 1029
Cincinnati, Ohio, US
I'll maybe get more into using Facebook for photography when they fix the issue of suggesting Friends who were from high school that I didn't give two shits about back then and sure as hell don't want to be contacted by now. That goes for ex girlfriends 10x!! Then when I reactivate, it sends those same a-holes a message telling them I'm back on. Sheesh!
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
ASYLUM - Photo wrote: I have yet to use Facebook to schedule a shoot. I'm not even sure where to start. How does one find new models that way? Starting place.... Ask the models you've already shot if they have a facebook page that they are active on. When you find one, post one of the pictures you did together on your page and tag her in it. Her friends see it on her page and click on the link to you to see who took the picture. They send you a friend request. If they are viable models you ask them to shoot. Most likely they say yes because they liked your original picture enough to want to go see who took it. Now do that again on her page after she shoots with you, and the snowball starts running down hill.
Photographer
Farenell Photography
Posts: 18832
Albany, New York, US
K E E L I N G wrote: Starting place.... Ask the models you've already shot if they have a facebook page that they are active on. When you find one, post one of the pictures you did together on your page and tag her in it. Her friends see it on her page and click on the link to you to see who took the picture. They send you a friend request. If they are viable models you ask them to shoot. Most likely they say yes because they liked your original picture enough to want to go see who took it. Now do that again on her page after she shoots with you, and the snowball starts running down hill. Being tagged (like in a status message) can do wonders as well.
Photographer
Llobet Photography
Posts: 4915
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
K E E L I N G wrote: Starting place.... Ask the models you've already shot if they have a facebook page that they are active on. When you find one, post one of the pictures you did together on your page and tag her in it. Her friends see it on her page and click on the link to you to see who took the picture. They send you a friend request. If they are viable models you ask them to shoot. Most likely they say yes because they liked your original picture enough to want to go see who took it. Now do that again on her page after she shoots with you, and the snowball starts running down hill. That's how it's working for me, without even trying. It just happened that way. For example, I did a shoot with a model/actress earlier this year. Did the friends thing on FB with her and her model/actress friend requested a shoot with me because she liked her friends pictures, through FB only. I posted her pictures up. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Photographer
Worlds Of Water
Posts: 37732
Rancho Cucamonga, California, US
J Welborn wrote: No not at all-----the Facebook "fad" will go away just as it did for Myspace and any other trash gossip site . Facebook is for kids and those with too much time on their hands LOL Totally agree. I posted details about my cruiseboat photoshoot on FB and got 100s of fat mothers of 4, high school pimple faces and skanky stripper chicks all sayin they are models and want to go on the cruise... ... WTF!... At least on MM there's female members that are alot closer to resembling models...
Photographer
WIP
Posts: 15973
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
You can be selective on FB. I put up a casting and only models replied. @ J Welborn more misinformation.
Photographer
K E E L I N G
Posts: 39894
Peoria, Illinois, US
Select Models wrote: Totally agree. I posted details about my cruiseboat photoshoot on FB and got 100s of fat mothers of 4, high school pimple faces and skanky stripper chicks all sayin they are models and want to go on the cruise... ... WTF!... At least on MM there's female members that are alot closer to resembling models... That's too bad. My results have been different..... 11 of the 14 models in my first page of pictures here on MM I found on Facebook. You be the judge of their beauty and quality. btw, the other 3 girls our primary means of communication is Facebook. So that means everyone on my first page are fb models.
Photographer
Grafanovitchi
Posts: 573
San Marcos, California, US
udor wrote: I posted recently for male models for a clothing line on MM and got a ton of responses, selected 3 for the shoot. Last week I had a casting call for female high fashion models and again, I had a ton of responses. Selected 3 models again, one new face that is signed with a good agency, one stunning high fashion model and the 3rd one is currently on the Bachelor show. I have no problems with MM and castings. I suspect that your location in New York City is much more to do with this.
Photographer
rxz
Posts: 1101
Glen Ellyn, Illinois, US
I was so impressed with fb I cancelled my a/c after 3 months. However I'm almost ready for my broker to put a bid on their stock - 50 cents a share.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
GRAF wrote: I suspect that your location in New York City is much more to do with this. ... and with your location...
Model
Kaia Murphy
Posts: 171
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
I thought about opening a FB account for my modeling work, but, as has been mentioned in this thread, I do a lot of nude and erotic work. That's a big no-no on FB. So alas, no point in doing things on FB for me; I can see the benefits of it based mostly off what genre of work you're doing and displaying. As for casting calls on MM - I check them daily. And that's all I have to say about that.
Photographer
WIP
Posts: 15973
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
udor wrote: I posted recently for male models for a clothing line on MM and got a ton of responses, selected 3 for the shoot. Last week I had a casting call for female high fashion models and again, I had a ton of responses. Selected 3 models again, one new face that is signed with a good agency, one stunning high fashion model and the 3rd one is currently on the Bachelor show. I have no problems with MM and castings. This one ? High Fashion Model (New Face?) wanted for Make-Up Project
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
c_h_r_i_s wrote: This one ? High Fashion Model (New Face?) wanted for Make-Up Project Yep... simple!
Photographer
DougBPhoto
Posts: 39248
Portland, Oregon, US
GRAF wrote: If that is the case, why is it becoming so difficult to get a casting response on MM? I have not looked at the traffic stats, but I am guessing that MM traffic has gone down significantly in recent years. Again guessing... but I think people have a limited amount of time they can spend on line and that time has shifted to FB. I would say that it has more to do with (at least I know many people with this impression) that the percentage of MM's users who are serious models and serious photographers has been getting smaller year by year. With fewer, true serious people using the site (or at least a vastly lower percentage), many of those people may not use the site as much as they used to. I think this says far more about MM and their decisions than it does Facebook.
Photographer
CameraSight
Posts: 1126
Roselle Park, New Jersey, US
J Welborn wrote: No not at all-----the Facebook "fad" will go away just as it did for Myspace and any other trash gossip site . Facebook is for kids and those with too much time on their hands LOL +1
Photographer
Virtual Studio
Posts: 6725
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
DougBPhoto wrote: I would say that it has more to do with (at least I know many people with this impression) that the percentage of MM's users who are serious models and serious photographers has been getting smaller year by year. With fewer, true serious people using the site (or at least a vastly lower percentage), many of those people may not use the site as much as they used to. I think this says far more about MM and their decisions than it does Facebook. Clearly there is a need for a disintermediated marketplace for these services - modelling and photography - so where have all the serious people gone?
Photographer
R.EYE.R
Posts: 3436
Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Nothing is killing anything. There are just swings in trends - that's all. Something people find it easier to network through Facebook, others through MM...
Photographer
Dark Shadows
Posts: 2269
Miami, Florida, US
Facebook, I will say has more professional models and industry people. By 'professional', I mean people that are actually working for clients and doing advertising campaigns and commercial work rather than just testing. However, MM is good for scheduling tests, especially for people that shoot nudes, or for freelance models in general. I think freelance models would find it more difficult to get photographers on Facebook to pay them because that's not something that is very common in the mainstream world. You actually run a small risk of insulting certain people if you as a model suggest that you want them to pay you for testing, so it's very different.
Model
Amelia Simone
Posts: 2155
Rosarito, Baja California, Mexico
_Rei_ wrote: As a llama who shoots primarily art-nudes, FB is next to useless for me, as I'm not able to show 95% of my images there. I do know full-time travelling llamas who have fan pages on FB, but they must then link back to MM or to their web sites to display any work that isn't implied or fashion. And they have frequent problems with their accounts getting suspended and having to start over again. I do see how it can be very good for networking and I often friend photographers on my generic, everyday profile there to stay in touch. But for llamaling purposes, I don't really see the point for me. Perhaps I'm missing something. Yes to this. Facebook isn't killing MM in my opinion. I can't post nudes there, so it's not the greatest networking for me. I've gotten one paid gig, and given, it was $150/hr, and only nudes, no erotic, etc., I'd say I lucked out with that one job. But I'm not getting that kind of work at all anymore from FB. It's mostly a bunch of guys who wanna chat, ugh
Photographer
Wild Image Media
Posts: 173
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
FB is more an adjunct for me - to follow on with the conversation after connecting with the llama on MM. When travelling to Edinburgh and Glasgow in July I was able to link up with and photograph five llamas in seven days on fairly short notice purely through MM contacts. The key was to give priority to messaging llamas who had logged in within 24hr as they were likely to be more motivated and active on the site - it worked .
Photographer
Rene O
Posts: 225
Paris, Île-de-France, France
I like MM but I also use FB a little. I'm wondering, as a photographer, how do you find models on FB? Do you search for "model" or what? Also, put one (semi)nude photo on your FB account and you'll get banned!
Photographer
Efan Bruder
Posts: 640
Vermillion, South Dakota, US
Rieni Otten wrote: I like MM but I also use FB a little. I'm wondering, as a photographer, how do you find models on FB? Do you search for "model" or what? Do a couple of draped nudes in every set. Ones with all the bits obviously covered. Put those on FB and tag the model (or her fan page, whichever she prefers) and watch your notifications and requests blow up.
Also, put one (semi)nude photo on your FB account and you'll get banned! Do the draped nudes as above, but for the nudes, put them on your personal website and link to it every time you mention you're looking for models.
Photographer
Garry k
Posts: 30130
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
I think both are good and I use them equally Glamour wise -I credit MM with being able to line up shoots with such Playboy Models as Lauren Vickers ( Italian Playmate of the year 2011 ) Melissa Jean and Amelia Talon ( though that last shoot fell through due to some unforseen circumstances outside of our control ) However Fashion wise I find a lot of my models in the real ( fashion ) world - and I generally only ask them if they are on FB
Photographer
Rene O
Posts: 225
Paris, Île-de-France, France
Efan Bruder wrote: Do a couple of draped nudes in every set. Ones with all the bits obviously covered. Put those on FB and tag the model (or her fan page, whichever she prefers) and watch your notifications and requests blow up. Ok, so I need to network on there. But again, how do you find models? As far as I know you can search for females in a certain region but that's it... and sending "do you want to model for me" to every pretty girl on there would feel a bit like spamming to me. I could do it but not as frequent as here on MM. When I need models I do a search on here and message more than 30 models in one hour (using copy and paste). I don't see myself doing that on FB. Then on the other hand, often I think that non-models look better than many self proclaimed models and I do appreciate the natural movements, expressions and poses of non-models as well. So yeah I'm gonna give FB a try :-)
Photographer
Efan Bruder
Posts: 640
Vermillion, South Dakota, US
Rieni Otten wrote: Ok, so I need to network on there. But again, how do you find models? As far as I know you can search for females in a certain region but that's it... and sending "do you want to model for me" to every pretty girl on there would feel a bit like spamming to me. I could do it but not as frequent as here on MM. When I need models I do a search on here and message more than 30 models in one hour (using copy and paste). I don't see myself doing that on FB. Then on the other hand, often I think that non-models look better than many self proclaimed models and I do appreciate the natural movements, expressions and poses of non-models as well. So yeah I'm gonna give FB a try :-) Add a few of the models on FB. Their friends will add you as you put up and tag photos of the models. Put any models or potential models on a friends list for "models." When you need a model, start posting statuses that read as short casting calls. Include a call to action like "Like this if you want to model for this." or "Message me for details."
Photographer
Camerosity
Posts: 5805
Saint Louis, Missouri, US
I don't have an account on FB because I don't trust their ever-changing privacy policy, and about once a year I hear something on the news about FV repeating their claim that they own the rights to all content posted on their web site. My daughter thinks I'm nuts. Probably other people do too. But about a month ago I directed a magazine's photo editor to a set of photos in a password-protected folder on my MM portfolio page. He asked - three times! - whether the photos had *ever* been posted on Facebook before he'd even look at them. I understand that most magazines won't use photos that have been "published" - and that includes posted on an online portfolio by their definition. But he was especially adamant about Facebook. FB either sued his magazine or threatened to - and the magazine agreed not to ever publish anything that had ever been posted on FB in order to avoid financial ruin. Sooner or later FB will go after someone who has the deep pockets to take them on in federal court. But the question is, will a publication that can afford to decide that this is the best use of their money? Apparently it's in FB's terms of service. I still don't think it would hold up in court. At least if a model puts some of my photos on FB, she didn't have the right to sign away my rights to the photos - and I've never agreed to FB's TOS.
Photographer
DANACOLE
Posts: 10183
Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Rieni Otten wrote: Ok, so I need to network on there. But again, how do you find models? As far as I know you can search for females in a certain region but that's it... and sending "do you want to model for me" to every pretty girl on there would feel a bit like spamming to me. I could do it but not as frequent as here on MM. When I need models I do a search on here and message more than 30 models in one hour (using copy and paste). I don't see myself doing that on FB. Then on the other hand, often I think that non-models look better than many self proclaimed models and I do appreciate the natural movements, expressions and poses of non-models as well. So yeah I'm gonna give FB a try :-) Look for modeling and photography groups in your area.. If there aren't any, then start one. Thats one way to find local models. Post up new work frequently.. Once a week or every 2 weeks, tag or mention the models Mua's whomever, worked on the shoots...if they are on FB, and they will also do the same... Their friends will see them and their friends friends will see them. Models on FB usually have tons of other model friends on their lists. MUA's and Hair stylists and Wardrobe stylists usually have tons of model friends as well... If they like your work then they will add you or subscribe to see more of your work. With FB they also get a sense of your personality, which is also a big thing to take note of... With enough networking and marketing yourself, then you will start to see what those of us who use FB faithfully and successfully, are talking about !! Those who say FB sucks just don't know how to use it and make it work for them...Whether for testing or for profit..
|