Photographer
Herman Surkis
Posts: 10856
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
P I X I E wrote:
![https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR7Egxp3a4CmLgAB3H2uD-lTE732i-wTxTfRi1P1HzoU6GTf-GT]()
? New style.
Requires much grunting (grundge style), thrashing of bushes, and throwing of sticks, and a massive back scratch and tickle all around at the end.
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 12067
Grand Rapids, Michigan, US
Herman Surkis wrote:
New style.
Requires much grunting (grundge style), thrashing of bushes, and throwing of sticks, and a massive back scratch and tickle all around at the end. OK . . . . 
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Herman Surkis wrote:
New style.
Requires much grunting (grundge style), thrashing of bushes, and throwing of sticks, and a massive back scratch and tickle all around at the end. Interested.
Photographer
Herman Surkis
Posts: 10856
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
P I X I E wrote:
Interested. You Montrealers are weird.
Oh, wait I used to live there.
Never mind.
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Herman Surkis wrote:
You Montrealers are weird.
Oh, wait I used to live there.
Never mind.
Photographer
MedievalIce
Posts: 233
Ithaca, New York, US
I didn't read the whole thread, but I just wanted to chime in and compliment the OP on a great post.
Photographer
mcclary
Posts: 84
Plantation, Florida, US
I am cracking up here. This post was well written and a lot of thought was put into it. That being said, the word gorilla has turned this into something that it wasn't meant to be.
Thank you for putting this up as a forum. It is one of the best subjects I have seen thus far. Respect
Photographer
New Art Photo
Posts: 701
Los Angeles, California, US
Whatever you say on MM, there will always be someone somewhere itching for a quarrel.
While all this was going on Someone contacted me about a TFP shoot;
Sadly ,you girls forgot one thing for your list... young women are attracted to douchebags.
Photographer
Jerry Nemeth
Posts: 33355
Dearborn, Michigan, US
New Art Photo wrote:
Whatever you say on MM, there will always be someone somewhere itching for a quarrel.
While all this was going on Someone contacted me about a TFP shoot;
Sadly ,you girls forgot one thing for your list... young women are attracted to douchebags. She will probably flake. 
Photographer
New Art Photo
Posts: 701
Los Angeles, California, US
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
New Art Photo wrote:
Whatever you say on MM, there will always be someone somewhere itching for a quarrel.
While all this was going on Someone contacted me about a TFP shoot;
Sadly ,you girls forgot one thing for your list... young women are attracted to douchebags. You brought it. You alone.
When you call models women who are moody, stupid, don't know what they want, and who like douchebags... Well you'll certainly start something.
Model
IDiivil
Posts: 4615
Los Angeles, California, US
Haha... oops, thanks for catching the mistake in the numbered list. It's fixed now.
Model
Laura UnBound
Posts: 28745
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
New Art Photo wrote:
Whatever you say on MM, there will always be someone somewhere itching for a quarrel.
While all this was going on Someone contacted me about a TFP shoot;
Sadly ,you girls forgot one thing for your list... young women are attracted to douchebags. I cant tell if you just called yourself a douchebag....I think you should CAM yourself.
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Laura UnBound wrote:
I cant tell if you just called yourself a douchebag....I think you should CAM yourself. 
Laura wins the internets.
Model
Phane
Posts: 2063
Rockville, Maryland, US
P I X I E wrote:
You brought it. You alone.
When you call models women who are moody, stupid, don't know what they want, and who like douchebags... Well you'll certainly start something. +1
Model
Phane
Posts: 2063
Rockville, Maryland, US
Laura UnBound wrote:
I cant tell if you just called yourself a douchebag....I think you should CAM yourself. I agree with Laura on this.....
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Phane wrote:
+1 Misogynistic individuals tend to piss me off greatly.
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 12067
Grand Rapids, Michigan, US
New Art Photo wrote:
Whatever you say on MM, there will always be someone somewhere itching for a quarrel.
While all this was going on Someone contacted me about a TFP shoot;
Sadly ,you girls forgot one thing for your list... young women are attracted to douchebags. Laura UnBound wrote:
I cant tell if you just called yourself a douchebag....I think you should CAM yourself. Dear Mods; I committed a "personal attack" on my own character . . . .
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Can we now discuss the OP please? If you disagree that's fine, but throw your poison elsewhere.
This is a super helpful thread and I really don't want to see it get locked.
Model
Phane
Posts: 2063
Rockville, Maryland, US
P I X I E wrote:
Misogynistic individuals tend to piss me off greatly. I Agree right up there with pedophiles!
Model
Phane
Posts: 2063
Rockville, Maryland, US
P I X I E wrote:
Can we now discuss the OP please? If you disagree that's fine, but throw your poison elsewhere.
This is a super helpful thread and I really don't want to see it get locked. She rocks socks
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Phane wrote:
She rocks socks IDiivil is one of my favourite models on MM.
Model
IDiivil
Posts: 4615
Los Angeles, California, US
Thanks, guys. That's very sweet of you to say
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 37171
Columbus, Ohio, US
P I X I E wrote:
Interested. Don't forget picking gnats off others hair for dinner part.
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 12067
Grand Rapids, Michigan, US
IDiivil wrote:
Thanks, guys. That's very sweet of you to say
Model
P I X I E
Posts: 35440
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Cherrystone wrote:
Don't forget picking gnats off others hair for dinner part.
Photographer
Jerry Nemeth
Posts: 33355
Dearborn, Michigan, US
P I X I E wrote:
IDiivil is one of my favourite models on MM. +1
Photographer
T A R I Q
Posts: 1302
Baltimore, Maryland, US
P I X I E wrote:
This rocks. +1
Photographer
Herman Surkis
Posts: 10856
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Considering the plenitude of reasons for not shooting with someone, it is surprising that anyone actually does.
Model
IDiivil
Posts: 4615
Los Angeles, California, US
Herman Surkis wrote:
Considering the plenitude of reasons for not shooting with someone, it is surprising that anyone actually does. I know, right?! Miracle every time it happens 
Photographer
Kevin Connery
Posts: 17824
El Segundo, California, US
K I C K H A M wrote:
And you give it to me even though you know Kelli + coffee can have bad results. So cookies but no coffee?
Coffeecake? Brownies? Cupcakes? Rice cakes?
Photographer
Rob Photosby
Posts: 4810
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
That Italian Guy wrote:
I don't regard models who don't want to trade with me as prima donnas!
I just assume they're blind 
Ciao
Stefano
www.stefanobrunesci.com Quote of the week!!!!
Model
Anna Adrielle
Posts: 18763
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
great post, followed by a hilarious thread with lots of people totally not getting the point :p anyway, great post
Photographer
Mike Hemming
Posts: 380
Easton, Maryland, US
Deleted original post
Sorry made a mistake quoted the wrong person.
Model
IDiivil
Posts: 4615
Los Angeles, California, US
Mike Hemming wrote:
You can have nice nudes in your port but "gyno" shots are going to scare off new models like snakes on the floor of your studio. Gyno shots would not be allowed on ModelMayhem regardless Although, like anything else, they can be missed sometimes. Gyno shots, however, break the rule on "emphasis on genitalia" ...
Model
Dea and the Beast
Posts: 4796
Saint Petersburg, Florida, US
Mike Hemming wrote:
You can have nice nudes in your port but "gyno" shots are going to scare off new models like snakes on the floor of your studio. Now there's a concept.
Anyone?
Photographer
Risen Phoenix Photo
Posts: 3779
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
IDiivil wrote:
Gyno shots would not be allowed on ModelMayhem regardless Although, like anything else, they can be missed sometimes. Gyno shots, however, break the rule on "emphasis on genitalia" ... I agree completely. As a nude photographer I have made it my business to not shoot the vag shot as I believe it to be distasteful and not particularly artistic. Many females love what I do. It is one of the reasons models ate almost always willing to shoot TF with me.
Photographer
Art of the nude
Posts: 12067
Grand Rapids, Michigan, US
Risen Phoenix Photo wrote:
I agree completely. As a nude photographer I have made it my business to not shoot the vag shot as I believe it to be distasteful and not particularly artistic. Many females love what I do. It is one of the reasons models ate almost always willing to shoot TF with me. So, you're completely happy with available models? No complaints or concerns?
Awesome!
More generally, I just talk to the models, and shoot no more than they are comfortable with, but that seems to be too complicated for some people.
Model
IDiivil
Posts: 4615
Los Angeles, California, US
Risen Phoenix Photo wrote:
I agree completely. As a nude photographer I have made it my business to not shoot the vag shot as I believe it to be distasteful and not particularly artistic. Many females love what I do. It is one of the reasons models ate almost always willing to shoot TF with me. I make no judgment on that style of imagery. 'Just saying it's not allowed on MM
Photographer
Herman Surkis
Posts: 10856
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Mike Hemming wrote:
You can have nice nudes in your port but "gyno" shots are going to scare off new models like snakes on the floor of your studio. You mean I can't let my Python and King snakes slither around (please note, I did not say run around) my studio floor.
|
