Forums > Photography Talk > If I pay a model, should I give them images also?

Photographer

Focal point of light

Posts: 66

Bellevue, Nebraska, US

I've done many time for print work, and I am thinking about hiring a model, just sure how the that works.

Apr 18 14 09:57 pm Link

Photographer

Aaron Pawlak

Posts: 2850

New York, New York, US

Focal point of light wrote:
If I pay a model, should I give them images also?

no

Apr 18 14 10:00 pm Link

Photographer

SPV Photo

Posts: 808

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

The correct answer is....maybe.

It depends on what you agree to. If you hire a model, maybe you can get a reduced rate if she wants images.  I would say the default position is that you're not expected to give images when you pay a model. But if the two parties agree to it, sure.

Apr 18 14 10:05 pm Link

Photographer

Focal point of light

Posts: 66

Bellevue, Nebraska, US

thanks

Apr 18 14 10:07 pm Link

Photographer

PANHEAD PHOTOGRAPHY

Posts: 1648

San Francisco, California, US

Why wouldn't you ?
More views

Apr 18 14 10:12 pm Link

Photographer

Graham Glover

Posts: 1440

Oakton, Virginia, US

Focal point of light wrote:
I've done many time for print work, and I am thinking about hiring a model, just sure how the that works.

If you're paying, you have no obligation.  She's gotten her consideration in the form of money.

However...

If you give her images, she can choose whether to use them, as in post them on MM or Fb.  If she uses them, then she likes your work.  If she's really good, then others will see your work and you have a bit more cred as a model photographer.

I gave my first paid model photos.  I've just booked another paid model, and she'll get photos.

Apr 18 14 10:19 pm Link

Photographer

imcFOTO

Posts: 581

Bothell, Washington, US

AaronPawlak wrote:

no

I never understand people who don't give at least a few images to the model. Isn't that good networking? Don't you want your work on their portfolio?

Apr 18 14 10:34 pm Link

Photographer

AJ_In_Atlanta

Posts: 13053

Atlanta, Georgia, US

imcFOTO wrote:

I never understand people who don't give at least a few images to the model. Isn't that good networking? Don't you want your work on their portfolio?

Not people who sell those images, the difference between an exclusive image sold rights managed vs stock is 10 fold or more

Apr 18 14 10:52 pm Link

Photographer

Aaron Pawlak

Posts: 2850

New York, New York, US

Focal point of light wrote:
If I pay a model, should I give them images also?

AaronPawlak wrote:
no

imcFOTO wrote:
I never understand people who don't give at least a few images to the model. Isn't that good networking? Don't you want your work on their portfolio?

I answered his question literally.
He said "give".

I might let her SEE them,
or let her USE THEM WITH LIMITATIONS,
but I would never both PAY for something AND
give it back to who I just paid for it.

I pay for the ownership of the images.
If it takes x amount of hours to achieve those images,
the rate might be based around the time it took,
but the pay is still for the images themselves.
The release; releases to me the ownership of the images.
The compensation was money.

Apr 18 14 11:01 pm Link

Photographer

Aaron Pawlak

Posts: 2850

New York, New York, US

mm glitch

Apr 18 14 11:04 pm Link

Photographer

J O H N A L L A N

Posts: 12221

Los Angeles, California, US

I think the thing to remember is that IMAGES HAVE VALUE.

So, to structure your compensation, you could pay just in American dollars, or you could pay in some combination of $$ plus a couple goats and a couple images.

Apr 18 14 11:04 pm Link

Photographer

DOUGLASFOTOS

Posts: 10604

Los Angeles, California, US

AaronPawlak wrote:

no

Yes! That is 100% Correct...No.

Apr 18 14 11:05 pm Link

Photographer

Bella Photoshoot

Posts: 229

Laguna Beach, California, US

~sigh~

Good luck OP.

Laurie bunny

Apr 18 14 11:45 pm Link

Photographer

Viator Defessus Photos

Posts: 1259

Houston, Texas, US

Or we could just link to one of the other 100 times this has been discussed and not beat each other over the head over it again...

Apr 18 14 11:51 pm Link

Photographer

afplcc-Glamour

Posts: 133

Fairfax, Virginia, US

SPV Photo wrote:
The correct answer is....maybe.

It depends on what you agree to. If you hire a model, maybe you can get a reduced rate if she wants images.  I would say the default position is that you're not expected to give images when you pay a model. But if the two parties agree to it, sure.

+

If it's a paying job, you're under no obligation to give prints or electronic files to the model.  OTOH....it's a way to earn good will (which can matter if you're a new photographer, new to a genre, or new to a geographic area).  It's also a way to get your images out there (b/c if the model has a tumblr or a VIP account and your images go up...remember, models' portfolios tend to get more unsolicited visits than do us photographers).

Ed

Apr 19 14 04:15 am Link

Photographer

D-Light

Posts: 629

Newcastle, Limerick, Ireland

If you sell your images or intend to at any time the answer has to be no. If this is purely a hobby and you get a kick from seeing your images posted somewhere, then it's up to you.

I never give a paid model images.

If you do decide to give a model images make sure you also give it to her in writing that she doesn't own the image and can only use it in her port. I know all that should be covered in the release but that doesn't always work.

When I was new at this I gave a paid model some images. She had them re-edited and sold them to a website. Her argument was that I gave her the images and it was up to her what she did with them afterwards. It took a long time and a lot of hassle to sort out.

Apr 19 14 06:44 am Link

Photographer

GM Photography

Posts: 6322

Olympia, Washington, US

Maybe.  What is your intended use of the images?  If it's just for your portfolio, the images themselves may not have as much value as if it were for a commissioned work, publication, catalog, etc.  Does she have a want/need for images from the shoot?  In most cases, an experienced model already has a full portfolio and wouldn't want/need them, but if she's a new model and needs to build her portfolio, you might provide images as compensation and negotiate a lower rate.  If the images are for a publication, you don't want her showing them before they're published.  Not enough information to answer your question, but hopefully some things to think about.

Apr 19 14 06:48 am Link

Photographer

GER Photography

Posts: 8463

Imperial, California, US

I do. Why be stingy? But I'm just a hobiest. I'm not shooting for a client, that's a different ball game.

Apr 19 14 07:04 am Link

Photographer

Vector One Photography

Posts: 3722

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

If I pay then they don't get photos (unless I really feel like it), if they pay they get it all (outtakes excepted), if no one pays then yes.  I also offer them a middle ground, some pictures.... some pay but you have to discuss how much of each up front.

Apr 19 14 11:00 am Link

Photographer

Carlo P Mk2

Posts: 305

Los Angeles, California, US

I do.

I hire models so I don't have worry about offering better or different photos than the ones s/he has. The shoots I go for right now are very simple - something few models have need for in their books.

If I shoot TF then I've have to sell myself, the shoot concept, the shoot crew, etc. I hate selling. Nowadays I'd rather pay and get the shoot done.

Apr 22 14 05:09 pm Link

Photographer

imcFOTO

Posts: 581

Bothell, Washington, US

J O H N  A L L A N wrote:
I think the thing to remember is that IMAGES HAVE VALUE.

So, to structure your compensation, you could pay just in American dollars, or you could pay in some combination of $$ plus a couple goats and a couple images.

Images only have value if someone is going to pay you for them. And if you're able to profit from images taken then good luck to you - and yes perhaps you shouldn't lightly give them away. Even in that case, I would imagine it's easy to find a couple of images to give to the model (for portfolio use only) that wouldn't cheapen the value of the other images.

However, many of the photographers here (me included) shoot mostly for fun (and the fan worship lol) and don't expect to be able to sell their images. I think many people over-value their work to be honest! I still see considerable value in my humble work appearing in a pro model's portfolio - but maybe that's just me.

Apr 22 14 09:22 pm Link

Photographer

alessandro2009

Posts: 8091

Florence, Toscana, Italy

SPV Photo wrote:
It depends on what you agree to.

+1

Apr 22 14 10:33 pm Link

Photographer

Wolfy4u

Posts: 1103

Grand Junction, Colorado, US

Personally,  I think the answer, "It depends what you agree to" is the worst possible answer. It assumes that you have to negotiate if your images have value, not what the value is. Images are the product of effort and time and so have value. If the creator of those images starts with position that he/she has to prove that value then it's unlikely that others will acknowledge that value.
Btw, I agree that one has the option of making any agreement they feel works.

Apr 23 14 03:56 am Link

Photographer

Jim McSmith

Posts: 794

Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom

Yes and your camera!

Apr 23 14 05:42 am Link

Photographer

Mike Collins

Posts: 2880

Orlando, Florida, US

You can do anything you want.  But with so many models willing to do TF shoots, why pay one and ALSO give them files?  Just save some money and go the TF route.   

Besides, if they are "professional" models, there is a very good chance they already have a great looking portfolio.  As someone else stated, if in fact you produce an image she HAS TO have in her book, well, now you created a demand for that image.  So either she pays for it or you renegotiate the modeling rate so it's win/win for everyone.      Sure, we want to be nice but we also have to be professional and the people we work with have to respect that.  Or they are not.

"It's not personal, Sonny. It's strictly business." Michael Corleone

Apr 23 14 06:28 am Link

Model

Figuremodel001

Posts: 342

Chicago, Illinois, US

Probably depends on the deal you make coming in. TFP and money are not mutually exclusive but the money would be lower if prints are included as well, would be my guess.

Apr 23 14 06:38 am Link

Photographer

Francisco Castro

Posts: 2628

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

PANHEAD PHOTOGRAPHY  wrote:
Why wouldn't you ?
More views

Because there are times when people don't care about "Likes" and  "views" and "comments".

Sure you can give models copies, but I do have projects that take MONTHS and I really don't want to deal with a model bugging me for photos.

So, when I pay a model for the shoot, and I am upfront in telling them that odds are, they are not going to be seeing the photos for a very long time, if at all. The compensation is cash.

Apr 23 14 06:42 am Link

Photographer

Model Mentor Studio

Posts: 1359

Saint Catharines-Niagara, Ontario, Canada

Francisco Castro wrote:

Because there are times when people don't care about "Likes" and  "views" and "comments".

Sure you can give models copies, but I do have projects that take MONTHS and I really don't want to deal with a model bugging me for photos.

So, when I pay a model for the shoot, and I am upfront in telling them that odds are, they are not going to be seeing the photos for a very long time, if at all. The compensation is cash.

I've got pics on models profiles that have thousands of views here and thousands of likes on FB. Return to me....SFA. On a models profile no one gives a shit who took the picture.

Apr 23 14 06:54 am Link

Photographer

BTHPhoto

Posts: 6985

Fairbanks, Alaska, US

Any two consenting adults can enter into any legal arrangement they both find agreeable and it's no business of any third party.  The only thing you should do is what ever you and the model want to do.

Apr 23 14 07:01 am Link

Photographer

dgold

Posts: 10302

Pawtucket, Rhode Island, US

Yes...
I pay professional adult travelling models at their rate AND gift a CD of images (over 100 ea) from film with my logo inset for their personal and/or portfolio use.

Apr 23 14 07:02 am Link

Photographer

Farenell Photography

Posts: 18832

Albany, New York, US

Focal point of light wrote:
If I pay a model, should I give them images

I've done many time for print work, and I am thinking about hiring a model, just sure how the that works.

I'll phrase it this way.

You don't NEED to provide images if you're paying them (unless that was part of the deal0 but many people CHOOSE to give them a few complimentary images as a thank-you. Many of those models will turn around & use them for their portfolio or Tumblr feeds or wherever.

Apr 23 14 07:41 am Link

Photographer

Top Gun Digital

Posts: 1528

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Focal point of light wrote:
I've done many time for print work, and I am thinking about hiring a model, just sure how the that works.

You don't have to since the model is being compensated with cash.  However, you might want to give the model a couple of lo-res images with your logo on them to strictly be used for self promotion purposes such as her MM page since you might possibly benefit from this.

Apr 23 14 07:59 am Link

Photographer

Square Jaw Photography

Posts: 470

Joshua Tree, California, US

Bella Photoshoot wrote:
~sigh~

Good luck OP.

Laurie bunny

LOL. Opened a can of worms.

As you can see from all above, that depends on you. Me, I use this as a creative outlet, so I usually give the images to the model, because I won't be offended if she makes money off them.

I've seen all spectrums of this opinion. I even saw a photographer post in his profile "shame on all who degrade our profession by offering our labors for free. You are the cause of so much dissention" and blah blah blah.

I for one love creating images the model loves, and if she can benefit from them further, so be it. I have so much more going in life to worry about it.

Apr 23 14 08:21 am Link