Forums > Model Colloquy > Would You Shoot a Model who is a Convicted Felon ?

Artist/Painter

Two Pears Studio

Posts: 3632

Wilmington, Delaware, US

as long as that felony was not while working with me... she or he is good to go!

Jun 25 15 11:03 am Link

Model

The Exotic Jewel

Posts: 658

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I think most photographers would shoot with a model who was convicted of a felony no matter what it was if it was something that bad I am sure they would be in prison a very long time anyway so not available to do a shoot lol.

Jun 25 15 12:24 pm Link

Photographer

Steve Arebalo

Posts: 2280

Orange, California, US

Interesting scenario. Several years ago, I retired as a Correctional Lieutenant after 20 years. I would not be afraid of working with an ex-felon. Most felons, are or were, drug addicts and/or burglers. If she made parole, the odds are good that she will not re-commit a similar crime. That is my train of thought and not a rule. If she had the look I wanted in my portfolio, I would  schedule a photo shoot. If you are that concerned, you can always bring an escort. IMHO

Jun 25 15 01:06 pm Link

Photographer

The Grey Forest

Posts: 542

Igoumenítsa, Kentriki Ellada, Greece

Yes, I would,

(1) its not my place to judge another individual = unless I'm fully aware of the circumstances and/or I've directly been in their shoes.
(1-a) though fundamentally, the graveness of said offence would be a consideration.
(2) "Three Felonies a Day" if everyone was caught and convicted of every law they broke; knowingly or not, this thread would have no point since we're all in the same boat according to overzealous US law.
(3) People change, I don't care about a persons past, rumor or hearsay, its who they are NOW.

(4) though admitting, the exception being I would never get near, let alone date anyone like say: Lorena Bobbitt

so I'm not perfect ...but I would still like to keep all my pieces tongue

Jun 25 15 02:04 pm Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30130

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Of couirse I live in Canada ( as does the Model ) where the laws are generally fair and the prison system has not been handed over to the private business sector

Jun 25 15 02:23 pm Link

Photographer

Eye of the World

Posts: 1396

Corvallis, Oregon, US

Garry k wrote:

Personally I would draw the line at working with any sex offender esp pedos

The problem being that in this country you can now become a lifetime sex offender for doing some of the same things most of us did as teens. How about urinating in public, or the 16 year old boy who has sex with his 15 11/12ths year old girl friend? It is one thing to protect the public from predators but the US has gone way overboard in giving out lifetime sentences for a lot of "coming of age" behavior.

I personally know a fellow who met a 16 y/o girl at a party. She wanted some weed, and they did a little making out in the car (breast fondling). All was totally with consent. Unfortunately the girl's boyfriend got jealous and made a police report. In that state the age of consent, while 16, only applies if the other party is less than 5 years older. The fellow was just beyond that arbitrary limit and was totally unaware that little touching was illegal. The girl was not traumatized (and had WAY more sexual experience than that already) but had no choice in whether he was prosecuted. Are we REALLY protecting society by giving such a person a lifetime label and restricting where he can live, whether he can go to a park unsupervised, etc?

The bottom line is that not all sex offenders are created equal.

Jun 25 15 02:56 pm Link

Photographer

J O H N A L L A N

Posts: 12221

Los Angeles, California, US

Eye of the World wrote:

The problem being that in this country you can now become a lifetime sex offender for doing some of the same things most of us did as teens. How about urinating in public, or the 16 year old boy who has sex with his 15 11/12ths year old girl friend? It is one thing to protect the public from predators but the US has gone way overboard in giving out lifetime sentences for a lot of "coming of age" behavior.

I personally know a fellow who met a 16 y/o girl at a party. She wanted some weed, and they did a little making out in the car (breast fondling). All was totally with consent. Unfortunately the girl's boyfriend got jealous and made a police report. In that state the age of consent, while 16, only applies if the other party is less than 5 years older. The fellow was just beyond that arbitrary limit and was totally unaware that little touching was illegal. The girl was not traumatized (and had WAY more sexual experience than that already) but had no choice in whether he was prosecuted. Are we REALLY protecting society by giving such a person a lifetime label and restricting where he can live, whether he can go to a park unsupervised, etc?

The bottom line is that not all sex offenders are created equal.

I don't know how much that really happens in practice - I would hope it doesn't. When I was a teenager it was fairly normal for 18 year old boys to have younger girlfriends. My girlfriend for about a year when I was 18 was 16 - another was 17.

Jun 25 15 03:06 pm Link

Model

Cwen

Posts: 1760

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Koryn wrote:
People engage in violent behaviors for many different reasons, and sometimes you can't really understand why they would act a certain way unless you knew everything about their life at that particular time, the people in it, the nature of their private relationships. Even the circumstances that led up to the violent incident for which they went to jail.

Also, some do become genuinely awful human beings when they are on drugs. A sober mind and a perspective that has been influenced by having a lot of time to sit in a cell, and think and think some more, does change people.

As a result, I think it's best not to judge felons without knowing them first - especially if they have served their time and resumed functional lives in regular society. People change. Even horrible people.

I very much agree with this.

My question is, why is this even coming up? Like it's casual shooting conversation, "Oh, btw, I tried to hack up my bf with a machete once. Sucks."

Jun 25 15 03:15 pm Link

Model

Cwen

Posts: 1760

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Eye of the World wrote:

The problem being that in this country you can now become a lifetime sex offender for doing some of the same things most of us did as teens. How about urinating in public, or the 16 year old boy who has sex with his 15 11/12ths year old girl friend? It is one thing to protect the public from predators but the US has gone way overboard in giving out lifetime sentences for a lot of "coming of age" behavior.

I personally know a fellow who met a 16 y/o girl at a party. She wanted some weed, and they did a little making out in the car (breast fondling). All was totally with consent. Unfortunately the girl's boyfriend got jealous and made a police report. In that state the age of consent, while 16, only applies if the other party is less than 5 years older. The fellow was just beyond that arbitrary limit and was totally unaware that little touching was illegal. The girl was not traumatized (and had WAY more sexual experience than that already) but had no choice in whether he was prosecuted. Are we REALLY protecting society by giving such a person a lifetime label and restricting where he can live, whether he can go to a park unsupervised, etc?

The bottom line is that not all sex offenders are created equal.

Yeah, those scenarios bother me as well. But most sex offender registries have enough details to figure out what they're in there for and from there make one's own deductions.

Jun 25 15 03:18 pm Link

Photographer

henrybutz New York

Posts: 3923

Ronkonkoma, New York, US

Assuming the model wasn't convicted of killing a photographer, I don't have an issue with it.

Jun 25 15 03:21 pm Link

Photographer

fsp

Posts: 3656

New York, New York, US

i couldn't care where she went to school or vacationed...

doesnt matter, just model!

Jun 25 15 04:40 pm Link

Model

Laura UnBound

Posts: 28745

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I've never required anyone disclose their criminal history to me prior to setting up a shoot, so its entirely possible Ive worked with any number of felons already. I don't know in what context "oh and by the way, I tried to kill a man once but Im all better now" would actually come up in "where are we meeting and what time?"

Jun 26 15 11:51 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

I think that I can say that more important than a criminal record (the person served the punishment and is out... that should count for something!) is if the model is mentally stable...

I have worked with models who were non-felons... and... holy shit... they were headcases... difficult during the shoot... and after... one became my stalker who lived in a fantasy world... I found out two years after I worked with her that she told people that she and I are getting married... my jaw seriously dropped, especially since I haven't seen her in those two years... smile

The other one was/is a neurotic control freak... who I am in contact as friends, but will not work with her, because she is extremely demanding and you can't do anything right... if I put out examples, you'd understand, but that is not important...

Anyway... point is... a little crazy is good... a level of clinical psychosis that really needs to be medicated... that's a lil' bit too much!

Jun 26 15 11:57 am Link

Photographer

AVD AlphaDuctions

Posts: 10747

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

I`d worry about the white balance.  my Sonys have enough trouble with blacks sad

Jun 26 15 12:11 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

Would You shoot with a Model who is a convicted Felon and why or why not ?

Would you shoot with a photographer who is a convicted felon and why or why not?
What if the felony was rape?

A model could be a rapist.
A rapist could be male or female.
Maybe they were falsely accused; maybe they are rehabilitated.

Say the felony was embezzlement. 

I guess I just don't like being around people who get in that kind of trouble with the law (lie/cheat/steal/violence/drugs, etc.).
It's public knowledge by state on their .gov site for the inquisitive.

I don't go around checking this kind of info with people I shoot with.
If alarm bells are going off, I don't shoot with them.
This is all in the vetting process of deciding who to work with.

If they have felonies in their past and my radar is not picking up on it, not sure if ignorance is bliss here.

Jun 26 15 03:17 pm Link

Artist/Painter

ethasleftthebuilding

Posts: 16685

Key West, Florida, US

Maybe MM needs a check box on every profile, like they have for piercings and tattoos.

FELON
YES
NO


LOL

Jun 26 15 03:52 pm Link

Photographer

Connor Photography

Posts: 8539

Newark, Delaware, US

Why not?  If she has the look and meets my need for the shoot.  What else do I need from a model.  If I am looking for a wife or daughter-in-law, it may be.   She has done her time and paid her due.  Let her integrates back to the society.

Jun 26 15 03:55 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

ernst tischler wrote:
Maybe MM needs a check box on every profile, like they have for piercings and tattoos.

FELON
YES
NO


LOL

lol

*Dies

Jun 26 15 03:57 pm Link

Photographer

Chris Wolf Photography

Posts: 906

Toledo, Ohio, US

Axe murderers need not apply. Sorry.

I have a gun. I have many guns.

Jun 27 15 10:33 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGlsUYGMYks

Excellent talk
Excellent advice

Jun 28 15 10:11 am Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

For me it would just depend on the model and the circumstances.  I've had more than one model I know get themselves into trouble.  When they've gotten it resolved, they've come back and asked to work.  I think you just have to look at each situation and judge it on its own merits.

Jun 28 15 10:26 am Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

Garry k wrote:
Would You shoot with a Model who is a convicted Felon and why or why not ?

I've never knowingly done so, but after 10 years and over 600 models, the odds are good that I have at least once, and there was at least one that I suspect was.

Today's society is too quick to blackball those who already repaid society for their crimes (which helps to perpetuate the cycle), so I would give them a chance if at all possible.

Also, too many crimes are classified as felonies (which is a back-door gun control tactic), and there are too many laws in general.

Wolfstar Studio wrote:
Axe murderers need not apply. Sorry.

I have a gun. I have many guns.

I don't differentiate shoots from other life activities, and I carrying whenever it's legal is the best practice.

Jun 28 15 10:53 am Link

Photographer

Kev Lawson

Posts: 11294

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I do not see why not as long as the conviction was not for murdering the last photographer they worked with. wink

Jun 28 15 11:09 am Link

Photographer

Richard Karlsen

Posts: 1813

Gloversville, New York, US

Patrick Walberg wrote:
With the large number of people I have photographed, I am absolutely sure that I have already shot with felons and did not know it.  The reason being that I don't care what someone did in the past as long as they've done their time.  How they are at the moment is more important to me.   Let's talk about the "here and now" not the past.  Besides, I don't want to waste time or money on background checks.  Can they model?  Or pay me?

I agree with the "here and now",  People make mistakes and learn from them.  Others make mistakes, and just haven't been caught yet!!!

Jun 28 15 03:20 pm Link

Photographer

Closing account JP

Posts: 250

Academician Vernadskiy - permanent station of the Ukraine, Sector claimed by Argentina/Chile/UK, Antarctica

Yes, but depending on the felony I may bring an armed escort

Jun 28 15 03:55 pm Link

Photographer

MMR Creative Services

Posts: 1902

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, US

Cash only. Next?

And how were you paid?

Jun 28 15 04:07 pm Link

Photographer

Justin Matthews

Posts: 1546

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

I think shooting a felon is a bit much, surely a prison sentence is enough. 😀

Jun 30 15 02:37 am Link

Photographer

TomFRohwer

Posts: 1602

Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

In most cases you do not know whether somebody has a criminal record anyway... Besides this I believe in social rehabilitation and reintegration.

By the way: 707 of 100,000 inhabitants of the US are in jail. (The second highst quota worldwide... Second to the Seychelles.)

How many inhabitants of the US had been in jail at some point in their lives? 2,000 of 100,000? 3,000? 4,000?

Some people even get arrested while shooting...

And some crooks do not get arrested at all...

https://www.onlinepublishingcompany.info/images/_attachments_/2014_06/nixon25.jpg

Jun 30 15 02:56 am Link

Photographer

GoldieImages

Posts: 173

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

It would depend on the felony committed, but if they were a violence or a property offence then probably not unless their case details convinced me otherwise.

Jun 30 15 03:27 am Link

Photographer

James Felix

Posts: 60

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Phoenix Digital Image wrote:
Generally, yes, I'll photographer her -- but it depends on the crime.

This.  In Florida being a Habitual Traffic Offender will net you a felony...not exactly the most dangerous of individuals.  If the crime was violent AND random then I would not.  Otherwise, I see no reason why I should turn away someone who has paid their penalty for their wrong.

Jun 30 15 05:40 am Link

Photographer

Vector One Photography

Posts: 3722

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

I don't care about their criminal past, as long as it wasn't murdering their photographer or stealing camera equipment.  If you only shoot people that have lead perfect lives or haven't done anything wrong in their past, you're not going to be taking a lot of pictures in your life.

Jun 30 15 10:50 am Link

Photographer

Photos_by_Stan

Posts: 295

Youngstown, Ohio, US

Cwen  wrote:
Yeah, those scenarios bother me as well. But most sex offender registries have enough details to figure out what they're in there for and from there make one's own deductions.

True ... But most people READING those do not bother with the details once they see the name and location

there are a few "offenders" within blocks of me .... if anybody actually read the whole thing , it was a charge of an underage person in a bookstore or something similar about magazines ...
So , all the employees got in trouble .. now they are all on the BAD list .... forever

Jun 30 15 11:27 am Link

Photographer

Photos_by_Stan

Posts: 295

Youngstown, Ohio, US

I believe someone already stated this ...
BUT , without doing an intensive background check ...
How do you know that you haven't already worked with one who has a felony record ?

Jun 30 15 11:33 am Link

Photographer

Light and Lens Studio

Posts: 3450

Sisters, Oregon, US

ontherocks wrote:
what kind of drug makes you want to hack up your boyfriend?

i'm always a bit suspicious when someone blames it on alcohol or drugs. even if the drugs/alcohol contributed did someone force them to take them?

if she did it because he was trying to kill her and it was kill or be killed then more power to her. otherwise i'd pass.

Bath Salts

Jun 30 15 11:45 am Link

Photographer

Light and Lens Studio

Posts: 3450

Sisters, Oregon, US

Garry k wrote:
Would You shoot with a Model who is a convicted Felon and why or why not ?

Just to clarify:  Are you referring to shooting her with:

A) A camera, or

B) A gun?

a) Depends on circumstances.  Many potential circumstances already discussed. But wouldn't rule it out. I may have already?  smile

b). Only if she attacked with the intent of inflicting bodily harm (to the camera or to me). smile

Jun 30 15 12:01 pm Link

Photographer

Garry k

Posts: 30130

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Light and Lens Studio wrote:

Just to clarify:  Are you referring to shooting her with:

A) A camera, or

B) A gun?

a) Depends on circumstances.  Many potential circumstances already discussed. But wouldn't rule it out. I may have already?  smile

b). Only if she attacked with the intent of inflicting bodily harm (to the camera or to me). smile

I realize that in the US - the term commonly has two meanings
Hoowever I live in Canada - and we dont talk much about shooting guns up here ( unless its related to something we see on an American News program )

Oh and this is a Modelling / Photography Site and we are having this discussion in the Modelling Forum

Hope this helps

Jun 30 15 08:05 pm Link

Photographer

Personality Imaging

Posts: 2100

Hoover, Alabama, US

Sure,  especially if she was still in prison.

Jun 30 15 08:22 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

Jun 30 15 08:44 pm Link

Photographer

Light and Lens Studio

Posts: 3450

Sisters, Oregon, US

Light and Lens Studio wrote:
Just to clarify:  Are you referring to shooting her with:

A) A camera, or

B) A gun?

a) Depends on circumstances.  Many potential circumstances already discussed. But wouldn't rule it out. I may have already?  smile

b). Only if she attacked with the intent of inflicting bodily harm (to the camera or to me). smile

Garry k wrote:
I realize that in the US - the term commonly has two meanings
Hoowever I live in Canada - and we dont talk much about shooting guns up here ( unless its related to something we see on an American News program )

Oh and this is a Modelling / Photography Site and we are having this discussion in the Modelling Forum

Hope this helps

wink   This is a "wink smiley".   It is often used in the cyberworld to denote humor or a joke.  Please remember this.

Well, throughout my adult life I have worked with lots and lots of Canadians (here in the US).  One thing I noticed is that they all had a great capacity for humor.  Is this something that only Canadians that leave their home country have?  wink  I must confess that I often wonder if that may be the case when reading some of the postings here in the forum by some of the Canadian photographers. 

Anyway, please understand that my post was tongue in cheek humor.  Please don't take it so seriously that you get your knickers all in a twist. big_smile

Jun 30 15 08:50 pm Link

Model

Jules NYC

Posts: 21617

New York, New York, US

Jun 30 15 08:52 pm Link