Forums > General Industry > Touch me not Models

Photographer

WIP

Posts: 15973

Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom

The drama.

Nov 12 11 10:26 am Link

Photographer

albertaphotog

Posts: 375

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

I will only adjust the hair as the model can't really see what's going on there and then only with the models permission. I watched a YouTube video of a photographer showing how to pose high school seniors, it actually embarrassed me watching it. He was grabbing their head and twisting it and stretching their neck. In one where they were on a stool that would turn he would put his leg up against theirs and grab their shoulders to turn them into position. I don't think your going to get the best images if your model or subject feels their personal space is being invaded.

Nov 12 11 10:43 am Link

Photographer

Ken Marcus Studios

Posts: 9421

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Robert Lynch wrote:

Ken Marcus Studios wrote:
Doing bondage photography is rather difficult if you can't touch the model . . .
. . . just sayin'

ei Total Productions wrote:
Somebody else already said that

It wasn't somebody else...
https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st16106504

I thought I heard that somewhere before . . . . .

Nov 12 11 11:17 am Link

Photographer

WIP

Posts: 15973

Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom

'Touch me not Models' maybe they think they'll get pregnant if a photographer touches them.

Nov 12 11 12:10 pm Link

Model

Jaelyn Fox

Posts: 1

STUDIO CITY, California, US

Being a model that has been involved in the XXX side as well as the mainstream side and everywhere in between, I personally have been "touched" in professional ways for adjustments and such, and then there are the times when photographers have tried to "touch" in counter-productive ways. HIGHLY unprofessional and makes the model feel immensely bad about themselves. I'd say it's about the best way to take a photo shoot and throw it right in the garbage, because once that "touch" happens my self esteem flys out the window and often times the shoot turns into a race to get out the door and to the nearest fast food for self gratification.

Nov 12 11 12:32 pm Link

Photographer

M Pandolfo Photography

Posts: 12117

Tampa, Florida, US

Maybe if you're a photographer who feels you must touch a model to make adjustments, perhaps the real issue is that you don't have the verbal communication skills to convey the pose...and not the model at all.

Nov 12 11 12:38 pm Link

Model

Nedah Oyin

Posts: 11826

Chicago, Illinois, US

David Cajio Photography wrote:
Modeling is a job.  Some jobs require a level of physical contact.

Modeling requires time in wardrobe (being touched), time in makeup (being touched), time in hair (being touched).

If a person is afraid of or does not want to have physical contact, he/she probably should probably not be pursuing modeling as a career/hobby.

There are male and female MUAs, male and female wardrobe stylists and male and female hairstylists.

So everyone else on the team is allowed to make professional physical contact to do their job, except the photographer?  Is that what you are saying?

If the photographer can just "explain everything" instead of touching, then surely the MUA, hairstylist and wardrobe stylist can just "explain everything" too, right?

So you managed to name everyone on set who has an express right and reason to touch models, and then.. The photographer..

Yes.. I'm convinced..

*edit*

On second thought.. Nahh.. Here's why..

A make-up artist cannot apply make-up without touching the model.. A stylist cannot adjust clothing without touching the model.. A hairstylist cannot tweak a style without touching the model..

YOU CAN ABSOLUTELY TAKE PICTURES WITHOUT EVEN BEING WITHIN REACH OF THE MODEL..

In the event that there is something on the model that HAS to be adjusted and there's no way s/he can do it him/herself, you know what you do..?

YOU ASK.. You have NO right to touch a model without permission.. Whoever fed you that is wrong..

Nov 12 11 12:47 pm Link

Photographer

MKPhoto

Posts: 5665

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

My limited experience was (I generally try to be respectful, polite and nice smile) that when I ask for permission to adjust the reply is  verbatim "do what you need to do"; from both MM and agency models.

Nov 12 11 12:51 pm Link

Photographer

Lightstories_UK

Posts: 18

Great Malvern, England, United Kingdom

I don't get all the fuss here?

Creeps will be creeps, no matter where they are. All the models I've ever met have had that female sense to spot one fairly quickly.

If you behave professionally and ask if you can adjust hair etc then it shouldn't be a problem. Underwear is a totally different matter of course, but more often than not the model respects me enough, and trusts me to move a strap or whatever.

However, i always ask, and I always check first. Models need to be respected as people too. Treat them as fellow professionals then everything is cool. Start pawing them and naturally the shoot will be over fast. The older and wiser the model the shorter this can take place.

I can't see why this thread has latest so long really. There are slimy photographers and sleazy models, to be honest both parties need to be aware around new people, as accusations are the easiest thing to make and the hardest to disprove.

Nov 12 11 01:43 pm Link

Model

Nedah Oyin

Posts: 11826

Chicago, Illinois, US

Freelance_Bob wrote:
If you behave professionally and ask if you can adjust hair etc then it shouldn't be a problem. Underwear is a totally different matter of course, but more often than not the model respects me enough, and trusts me to move a strap or whatever.

However, i always ask, and I always check first. Models need to be respected as people too. Treat them as fellow professionals then everything is cool. Start pawing them and naturally the shoot will be over fast. The older and wiser the model the shorter this can take place.

My favorite part..

Nov 12 11 01:59 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Lynch

Posts: 2550

Bowie, Maryland, US

c_h_r_i_s wrote:
'Touch me not Models' maybe they think they'll get pregnant if a photographer touches them.

No.  They just know we have cooties.

Nov 12 11 02:04 pm Link

Photographer

Simmagination

Posts: 3129

Westminster, Maryland, US

I rarely touch models myself, I always thought that's what monopods were for https://snesorama.us/board/images/smilies/poke0ba.gif

Nov 12 11 11:56 pm Link

Model

Mr. Tengu

Posts: 388

New York, New York, US

So... how about the reversal of that situation?

What about models that touch photographers?

I know that he didn't complain...


WARNING: This image is not work-safe and may cause harm to your eyesight!

Nov 13 11 07:00 am Link

Photographer

Dan D Lyons Imagery

Posts: 3447

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Models that state it politely yet firmly may have had a quasi-GWC experience or three already, may have heard *stories* from other girls about it & now fear it, may just be paranoid in life, or are just plain ol' dramahhh!

Personal experiences with this: I prefer not touching models, for a variety of reasons. I prefer boosting their self-confidence with my words, including telling them how 'perfectly' they 'nailed that pose(!)'. I speak very high-level English, and am completely capable of dumbing it down as-needed and when-required. Therefore, I *can* provide direction right down to the last mm. But then again, my style is such that I merely generally direct with generalities, allowing model to be/feel creative when she 'nails that pose', and allows for models of mine to have varying poses than other models of mine. Yet, I shoot with a poop-load of noobs. They are competent and we make it to the pose every time, but they desire a quicker pace so 7/10 times what do I hear? This: "Just...POSE me! GAHHH!". So I do. Read my tags, and you'll see what they think of me "just pose"(ing) them neutral  It's a pain at times, but it gets the job done and done right. I'd rather pose her and create images that we/*the client* wants, than be very very hands-off and have a disc full of stiffness and flat captures due to standard posing and half-dead expressions sad 

IMHO alone, as always;

~Danny
http://dbiphotography.co.cc
https://www.modelmayhem.com/1983551

Nov 13 11 08:12 am Link

Model

MissSybarite

Posts: 11863

Los Angeles, California, US

Miss Anthrope 1007 wrote:
It goes beyond into interactive performance art
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/ne … ?track=rss
wherein the possibility of being touched by a
MOCA Gala 2011 patron became an issue if auditioner
was to become one of the gazing spinning heads,
which I'm doing this evening as part of Marina
Abromavic's piece for MOCA Gala 2011 smile

At MOCA Gala 2011 I was a center"gazing head"piece -> http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/13/moca-gala-2011-marina-abramovic-debbie-harry-and-more-photos.html -> and all patrons abided by no touch rules smile

Nov 13 11 10:26 am Link

Photographer

Don-Jones

Posts: 302

Memphis, Tennessee, US

That's why I have someone else to it.  If the model is fine with me adjusting hair and clothes, I'll do it.  Otherwise I have someone else stand near to make adjustments.  Regardless... there will be touching.  Nothing I hate more than getting a near perfect shot, need a slight adjustment, and the model can't return to the pose naturally. 

Which on a comical note, we could always use one of those grabby reach things old people use to pick shit off the floor with to make adjustments.

Nov 14 11 10:24 am Link

Photographer

GER Photography

Posts: 8463

Imperial, California, US

Making hair or wardrobe adjustments is sometimes necessary, before approaching a model I tell them what I need to do and ask if it's OK. If a photographer just grabs a handful of boobage, take one of his expensive lights and smash him over the head with it two or three times and tell him, "Bad photographer!!" The idiot deserves it!!:-))

Nov 14 11 10:35 am Link

Model

Allegriana

Posts: 1172

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

descending chain wrote:
Seno Akta Gamat!

I. Love. You!!!!

Nov 14 11 09:56 pm Link

Model

Venessa Baez

Posts: 616

NORTH HOLLYWOOD, California, US

Well there are some things that can't be adjusted by the model because of perspective, such as hair or long dresses/hanging fabric from outfits.

Nov 29 11 07:41 pm Link

Photographer

37photog

Posts: 710

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

I think the models are implying they don't want creepy photographers touching them in a joking around/we're becoming friends way.

Nov 29 11 07:54 pm Link

Photographer

GKS Photography Studios

Posts: 1

London, England, United Kingdom

Working in a different part of the world may offer some perspective to this dilemma you all seem to be having. The more I read this thread, the more I only shake my head in frustration over how stupid some people can get. And here is why:

1) Modelling is a profession much like everything else we do in life. As stated earlier, Fashion Models are not touched, they are manhandled, and they have to live with it. The same for Agency models that are pure professionals. Why wouldn't this go for MM models or Internet models as well? Are they a different breed? It makes one wonder....

2) I usually have atleast a make-up artist with me on the set when I shoot, especially when doing glamour or pin-up because of the extreme make-up involved. However, rarely do I ask the MUA to do shit other than keep an eye on the make-up. Adjusting is something I do myself, as I know exactly how I want it. This goes for almost everything, except their pubic area. I have never had issues, always returning models, and no problems. But then again, I never do TFPs. Always paid work, and mostly from Agencies.

3) Being a model is more than just standing there and look pretty and hope for the best. Some of the model behavior in here flat out grosses me out. Why the hell are you models in the first place? The personal space thing is null and void the MOMENT you show up for a shoot. I never ask permission to do anything. I always say: "excuse me...." and do what I need to do. Simple. But even then, its very important to have a 10 minute meeting ahead of the shoot explaining the rules. It works wonders. Personal space be damned. I agree with the OP that models like that have no future in the industry.

What really bugs me the most is that the models here actually have most of the photographers agreeing with them that "never touch me." I agree that perhaps they have met a few too many GWCs, a few too many gropers for other reasons than professionalism, but hey, met a few very unprofessional girls too. Same thing, just different reasons behind the unprofessionalism. I dont say that its ok to "grope" a model. Of course it isnt. I never touch a model for other than getting my pictures perfect. Period. Feeling up a model never even occured to me to do. And most models know this already, especially the professionals.

But models coming into this business with the idea that they will be left alone is sadly mistaken. Its a rough business, and survival of the fittest. If you prove not worthy to work with, then you lose work. Strange that last time I saw Dean Johnson being photographed (was videod by the magazine, just cant for the life of me remember which one), she was both touched and GROPED by the photographer, and it was like a normal part of the day for her. As long as its not meant in any sexual way, and is for professional means, it shouldnt bother the model at all.

Maybe I am a bad communicator then. Maybe I need to visualize. Who cares? My advice to photographers who encounter issues with this. Use professionals. Doesnt cost THAT much to hire them, if you keep away from the supermodels.

Bottom line is that I have done this for a few years now and never ever had issues. NEVER. I touch my models as I see fit to get the images I need. They know this BEFORE we start shooting, as I dont have to lose focus by asking later on. But, I never grope their pubes or boobs. Thats a big no no for me too. But anything else is fair game. And the models are fine with it. And unless you work with amateurs, they know this already. If they dont, they have some issues themselves. Get used to it or get out. Easy as that.

Now, flame me too, I couldnt care less.

EDIT: realized this is an old thread. I humbly apologize.

Jun 29 12 04:57 pm Link

Photographer

Rik Austin

Posts: 12164

Austin, Texas, US

Moderator Note!
This thread was done six months ago.

Jun 29 12 05:04 pm Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Shiva Photo wrote:
" I will not tolerate HANDS ON PHOTOGRAPHERS " This appears in a recent model portfolio

Reluctance of a model to be touched by the photographer even for adjustment of a pose for best angle or lighting is counter productive to getting the best shots. Review of You tube videos and DVDS show that the best photographers in the field adjust the models face and body. It appears to be an accepted practice.

Models who are absolutely " touch me not"  must think twice about a serious career in modeling.

Photographers and Models opinions are welcome. A touchy subject no doubt.

Depends on the model's skill, and how literally they mean it.  I've had models I never needed to get within six feet of, and models how said "no touching" who were fine with it once they understood the need, and if asked / warned.

Jun 29 12 06:15 pm Link

Model

Loona Wynd

Posts: 1282

South Portland, Maine, US

Augustine York wrote:
I can't recall a single time in modeling where someone had to put a hand on me to show me how to pose or to adjust a piece of clothing for me. Usually a quick "move your bra strap" or "to the left" or "look up" does the trick.

If a model is so inept at following direction, or a photographer is so inept at giving it, that the photographer needs to be physically touching the model to get her to move the way he wants her to... then someone is doing something wrong.

And yes, I know there are some exceptions where someone is in such a complicated pose they can't even reach their own panties to adjust them, but seriously, how often do those scenarios happen?

In the shots with my cloak the photographer made slight adjustments to the cloak and pointed for hand positions.  It made sense for him to make that adjustment as if I did, I would have wrecked the rest of the pose.

I think that if they tell me what they are doing and ask me before hand I have no problem with it.  Sometimes my understanding isn't exactly the same as the photographers.  Still, it's nice for them to show examples of what they are looking for, give verbal direction, and then only then adjust things as necessary.

Jun 29 12 06:58 pm Link

Photographer

Jeffrey M Fletcher

Posts: 4861

Asheville, North Carolina, US

I just was reading this thread after reading some material on bodycasting and I realized I'm going straight to hell, or jail, or the poorhouse, or somewhere bad.

I mean I'm actually educating myself about something that would require touching a model's breasts and genital areas.

I'm damned.

Jun 29 12 07:40 pm Link

Model

MelissaAnn

Posts: 3971

Seattle, Washington, US

I can touch myself, thank you very much. big_smile

Jun 29 12 08:27 pm Link

Photographer

Jerry Nemeth

Posts: 33355

Dearborn, Michigan, US

MelissaAnn  wrote:
I can touch myself, thank you very much. big_smile

OK!

Jun 30 12 02:44 am Link

Model

J Jessica

Posts: 2431

Coconut Creek, Florida, US

I don't mind touching.
o_O

Jun 30 12 02:57 am Link

Clothing Designer

BlackPlanet Styling

Posts: 681

Lewes, England, United Kingdom

It is strange how designers never get this problem. We have to touch fitting models. Even working with a seamstress I have to make adjustments constantly.
But that is the difference probably. Designers generally wouldn't be working alone and the model wouldn't generally be nude.
There is absoloutely no way a photographer has any need to touch a model. The model has hands; and can do it herself. And often the model is nude or semi nude.
Because of the activities of the odd perv photographer - which many models will have had - models will often be nervous about a photographers approach. In addition; while I may have to do it 30 times during the course of a fit; I never do it without telling the model what I am about to do when near to her waist, chest etc. and have managed to avoid any kind of touching of a model's or client's flesh in 5 years. So if we can manage it; photographers certainly can. So it shouldn't even be an issue; indeed for the vast majority it isn't with a bit of common sense when and if adjustment is required. If you want to see how it is done with correct decourm yet lots of tugging and pulling; spend a day with a designer. But I think most photographers wouldn't be the lunge and grope type; but unfortunately one or two are and it is these that models will invoke a no touching rule to set the ground rules out for.

Jun 30 12 03:06 am Link

Photographer

Hugh Alison

Posts: 2125

Aberystwyth, Wales, United Kingdom

Neil Snape wrote:
...agencies models will never ever say something if you help pose them. Yet there lies the reality of being professional on all sides.

Alabaster Crowley wrote:
I don't think part of being a professional includes letting people touch you without asking. That's a personal thing.

Neil lives in Paris and shoots fashion for a living on both sides of the Atlantic...  you don't.

Edit...

didn't realise this was a zombie thread...

Common sense and good manners avoids most problems.
Pity they are so bloody rare.

Jun 30 12 03:22 am Link

Photographer

Aspiration Images

Posts: 184

Gosford, New South Wales, Australia

Rule 1. Don't touch the model
If you do need to break Rule 1, ask first.

Jun 30 12 05:27 am Link

Photographer

Eye of the World

Posts: 1396

Corvallis, Oregon, US

It is interesting to watch well known professiionals at work. Watched this video of Peter Hegre recently and noticed a fair amount of touching. http://vimeo.com/43653809

Jun 30 12 09:06 am Link

Photographer

KonstantKarma

Posts: 2513

Campobello, South Carolina, US

I'm curious about nude great-granny models - What if you need to flip her breast back around to her front side?

Jun 30 12 09:12 am Link

Model

The Grace Gabbana

Posts: 358

Santa Rosa, California, US

Shiva Photo wrote:
" I will not tolerate HANDS ON PHOTOGRAPHERS " This appears in a recent model portfolio

Reluctance of a model to be touched by the photographer even for adjustment of a pose for best angle or lighting is counter productive to getting the best shots. Review of You tube videos and DVDS show that the best photographers in the field adjust the models face and body. It appears to be an accepted practice.

Models who are absolutely " touch me not"  must think twice about a serious career in modeling.

Photographers and Models opinions are welcome. A touchy subject no doubt.

It's so crazy to me that all these "models" are reluctant to fully participate in a shoot. I think it may just be individuals who are calling themselves models that have this problem. I certainly know how to strike a pose, and what my good angles are, but I definitely don't know if my hair is falling in the proper place, or if I have flyaways on top of my head, and if I'm in a pose where my head is tilted back, then common sense dictates that I can't see what's not in my peripheral vision. Just change my position. Whether I like being re-positioned or not is irrelevant. It's my job. I'm there to make this process as efficient and productive as possible.

For peet's sake! During runway shows, we're literally stripped naked and shoved into our clothes for the runway by designers and stylists, in the midst of lots of other half-naked models. It's like being man-handled. Being re-positioned is nothing to complain about, just a part of the job.

Personally, I prefer to be re-positioned rather than to have someone bark vague orders like "fix your hair", that's just frustrating, and messes up the creative flow.

G

Jun 30 12 09:33 am Link

Photographer

KonstantKarma

Posts: 2513

Campobello, South Carolina, US

I guess that's the difference between models who see the job as a job, or as something latently sexual.

Jun 30 12 10:40 am Link

Photographer

CS Dewitt

Posts: 608

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Venessa M Baez wrote:
Well there are some things that can't be adjusted by the model because of perspective, such as hair or long dresses/hanging fabric from outfits.

+1

Jun 30 12 02:20 pm Link

Photographer

Greg Kolack

Posts: 18392

Elmhurst, Illinois, US

MelissaAnn  wrote:
I can touch myself, thank you very much. big_smile

When you think about me do you touch yourself?

smile

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv-34w8kGPM

Jun 30 12 02:28 pm Link

Photographer

UCPhotog

Posts: 998

Hartford, Connecticut, US

https://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g285/webpager/original%20default/jeeziz3.jpg

Jun 30 12 02:45 pm Link

Photographer

J I M

Posts: 524

New York, New York, US

Rik Austin wrote:
This thread was done six months ago.

Obviously, it wasn't...

smile

Jun 30 12 02:49 pm Link

Photographer

liddellphoto

Posts: 1801

London, England, United Kingdom

Likely to be diva but perhaps from a bad experience. I like I have asked most models I have worked with if I could adjust their hair or something and every one has no had an issue with it and hugged me when we have said goodbye. There should be no problem if respect is involved.

Jun 30 12 02:55 pm Link